Skip to main content

Automatic Sub Classification of Benign Breast Tumor

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 18))

Abstract

This paper describes about automatic classification of benign lesions. Our re-search work mostly aims at development of a data driven effective classification system to determine type of benign breast tumors. The existing system in medical field identifies the type of benign breast tumor based on histopathological report obtained after a painful surgical process. Our target is to develop a system that would work without histopathological attributes to avoid pains to the patient. Our focus was to eliminate the role of histopathological attributes in the detection of benign tumor type. So we tried to identify correlation of histopathological features with mammographic image features and patient history features in order to explore if histopathological features can be replaced by corresponding correlated features. With replaced attributes we gain training accuracy for J48 as 79.78% and with SVM 81.91%. We obtained testing accuracy for J48 and SVM as 100% and 90.90% respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhale, A., Joshi, M., Patil, Y.: Role of clinical attributes in automatic classification of mammograms. In: Emerging ICT for Bridging the Future-Proceedings of the 49th Annual Convention of the Computer Society of India (CSI), vol. 1, pp. 283–292. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buciu, I., Gacsadi, A.: Directional features for automatic tumor classification of mammogram images. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 6(4), 370–378 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, R.-F., Wu, W.-J., Moon, W.K., Chou, Y.-H., Chen, D.-R.: Support vector machines for diagnosis of breast tumors on us images. Acad. Radiol. 10(2), 189–197 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. El-Naqa, I., Yang, Y., Wernick, M.N., Galatsanos, N.P., Nishikawa, R.M.: A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 21(12), 1552–1563 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedenreich, C.M., Bryant, H.E., Alexander, F., Hugh, J., Danyluk, J., Page, D.L.: Risk factors for benign proliferative breast disease. Int. J. Epidemiol. 29(4), 637–644 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gurevich, I.B., Koryabkina, I.V.: Comparative analysis and classification of features for image models. Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 16(3), 265–297 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hartmann, L.C., Schaid, D.J., Woods, J.E., Crotty, T.P., Myers, J.L., Arnold, P.G., Petty, P.M., Sellers, T.A., Johnson, J.L., McDonnell, S.K., et al.: Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 340(2), 77–84 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hejazi, M.R., Ho, Y.-S.: Automated detection of tumors in mammograms using two segments for classification. In: Advances in Multimedia Information Processing-PCM 2005, pp. 910–921. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jasmine, J.S.L., Govardhan, A., Baskaran, S.: Classification of microcalcification in mammograms using nonsubsampled contourlet transform and neural network. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 531–539 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kilic, N., Gorgel, P., Ucan, O.N., Sertbas, A.: Mammographic mass detection using wavelets as input to neural networks. J. Med. Syst. 34(6), 1083–1088 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lakshmi, N.V.S.S.R., Manoharan, C.: A novel hybrid ACO based classifier model for mammogram microcalcifications using combined feature set with SVM. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 53(2), 239–248 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mohan Kumar, S., Balakrishnan, G.: ME. Statistical features based classification of microcalcification in digital mammogram using stochastic neighbor embedding. Int. J. Adv. Inf. Sci. Technol. (IJAIST) ISSN 2319:2682

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mohanty, A.K., Senapati, M.R., Lenka, S.K.:. Retracted article: An improved data mining technique for classification and detection of breast cancer from mammograms. Neural Comput. Appl. 22(1), 303–310 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Must, A., Phillips, S.M., Naumova, E.N., Blum, M., Harris, S., Dawson-Hughes, B., Rand, W.M.: Recall of early menstrual history and menarcheal body size: after 30 years, how well do women remember? Am. J. Epidemiol. 155(7), 672–679 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nagi, J., Abdul Kareem, S., Nagi, F., Ahmed, S.K.: Automated breast profile segmentation for ROI detection using digital mammograms. In: 2010 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES), pp. 87–92. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pradeep, N., Girisha, H., Sreepathi, B., Karibasappa, K.: Feature extraction of mammograms. Int. J. Bioinform. Res. 4(1), 241 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raghavan, G.: Mammogram analysis: Tumor classification. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robsahm, T.E., Tretli, S.: Breast cancer incidence in food-vs non-food-producing areas in norway: possible beneficial effects of World War II. Br. J. Cancer 86(3), 362–366 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenberg, R.D., Yankaskas, B.C., Abraham, L.A., Sickles, E.A., Lehman, C.D., Geller, B.M., Carney, P.A., Kerlikowske, K., Buist, D.S.M., Weaver, D.L., et al.: Performance benchmarks for screening mammography 1. Radiology 241(1), 55–66 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shi, X., Da Cheng, H., Hu, L.: Mass detection and classification in breast ultrasound images using fuzzy SVM. In: JCIS (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thongkam, J., Xu, G., Zhang, Y., Huang, F.: Toward breast cancer survivability pre-diction models through improving training space. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(10), 12200–12209 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Titus-Ernsto, L., Tosteson, A.N.A., Kasales, C., Weiss, J., Goodrich, M., Hatch, E.E., Carney, P.A.: Breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17(10), 1281–1290 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, S., Liu, H., Song, E.: Marker-controlled watershed for lesion segmentation in mammograms. J. Digital Imag. 24(5), 754–763 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zaïane, O.R., Antonie, M.-L., Coman, A.: Mammography classification by an association rule-based classifier. MDM/KDD 62–69 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledegment (Ethical Approval)

The authors desires to express gratitude towards Dr. U. V. Takalkar [M.S. (Gen.Surg.) M.E.D.S FUICC (SWITZERLAND) FAIS, MSSAT (USA), Cancer, Chairman, Kodlikeri Memorial Hospital] for their backing and priceless guidance. Images were offered by Kodlikeri memorial Hospital, Aurangabad and Hedgewar Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparna Bhale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bhale, A., Joshi, M. (2018). Automatic Sub Classification of Benign Breast Tumor. In: Yang, XS., Nagar, A., Joshi, A. (eds) Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 18. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6916-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6916-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6915-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6916-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics