Skip to main content

Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia: Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Handbook of Contemporary Indigenous Architecture

Abstract

If it is true that public buildings “…reflect the beliefs, priorities and aspirations of a people” (Powell 1995: ix), what do Australia’s public buildings say about Australians? More specifically, what does the design of Australia’s courthouses say about the beliefs, priorities, aspirations and agency of Australian people and in particular, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples?

The original version of this chapter was revised: Author biography has been updated. The erratum to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_35

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more information on the Supreme Court of New Zealand , see Watson (2012).

  2. 2.

    The discrimination facing Indigenous people in the legal system has been identified in both its criminal (see, for example, Commonwealth of Australia 1991) and civil processes (Cunneen and Schwartz 2009: 726–727).

  3. 3.

    The design for Supreme Court building in Darwin included a mosaic for the forecourt designed by Warlpiri artist Norah Nelson Napaljarri in the first instance (Birnberg and Kreczmanski 2004: 209).

  4. 4.

    A number of courthouses around Australia hold large collections of Aboriginal art and artefacts and could be seen as operating as informal Indigenous keeping houses (see Grant and Greenop 2018).

  5. 5.

    The aforementioned 55 m2 (592 ft2) mosaic by Norah Nelson Napaljarri entitled Yiwarra Jukurrpa (Milky Way Dreaming) (1990–1) “became the subject of dispute [and traditional litigation] within the artist’s community. Both its subject matter and innovative style caused some degree of discord amongst senior law men and women at Yuendumu ” (Angel 2000: 12–13) which was in time, resolved. It is now displayed inside the building to allow viewing from above. Pedestrians are allowed to walk across the art work. See a recent photo here: http://unprojects.org.au/un-extended/dear-un/beautiful-injustice/

  6. 6.

    This approach has been termed the cultural design paradigm in the housing setting. Go-Sam writes:

    The cultural design paradigm uses models of culturally distinct behaviour to inform definitions of Aboriginal housing needs. Its premise is that to competently design appropriate residential accommodation for Aboriginal people who have traditionally-oriented lifestyles, architects must understand the nature of those lifestyles (2008: 53).

  7. 7.

    While there has been some debate about who is authorised to express Aboriginality through the incorporating of signs and symbols into architecture (see Lochert 1997; Dovey 2000) and there have been concerns about appropriate use (see Memmott and Reser 2000; Murphy 2016: 292–294), employing this approach is common.

  8. 8.

    Judge Paul Grant, President of the Children’s Court of Victoria notes that:

    [c]ourtrooms used for [Children’s] Koori Courts have been adapted for the court’s particular processes. Aboriginal artworks are on the walls and the Australian, Aboriginal and the Torres Strait Islander flags displayed (Grant, P 2009: 6).

  9. 9.

    The retractable screens are a technological solution to conceal the dock, the bench, the witness box/remote screen and other accoutrements of the traditional court (Grant et al. 2011).

  10. 10.

    Note: the Magistrates Aboriginal Courtroom at Port Augusta contains a dock, despite architects attempting to negotiate for its exclusion (Harrison 2002).

  11. 11.

    Aboriginal avoidance practices refer to those relationships in traditional Aboriginal societies where certain people are required to avoid others in their family or clan as a mark of respect.

  12. 12.

    In 2015, the Kalgoorlie -Boulder Indigenous Sentencing Community Court lost government funding; however, it continues to operate without a dedicated budget.

  13. 13.

    By contrast, the new courthouse in Coffs Harbour, New South Wales , (within the Coffs Harbour Justice Precinct; PTW Architects in collaboration with the National Aboriginal Design Agency ) was designed with windows in the holding cells. These windows allowed for sight to the external environment. However, police raised risk mitigation issues that forced designers to increase the height of the window to above the height of juvenile offenders (see Rowden and Jones 2015: 16).

  14. 14.

    ‘Country ’ is a place of belonging and connection for Indigenous Australians that extends beyond the meaning that non-Indigenous Australians attach to land.

  15. 15.

    See http://iredalepedersenhook.com/.

  16. 16.

    Emphasis added by authors.

  17. 17.

    The importance of sightlines for Indigenous Australians is discussed in Reser (1992: 191), Grant and Memmott (2008: 644), Rowden and Jones (2015: 15).

  18. 18.

    The Pine Rivers Courthouse, in Queensland , designed by Guymer Bailey Architects, provides an exemplary transparent court frontage (Beynon 2010: 40–43).

References

  • Angel, A. (2000). Art and law: Things that endure. Balance: Journal of the Northern Territory Law Society, 122(6), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, T. (2013). Indigenous people, crime and punishment. London & New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, T., & Grant, E. (2016). Courthouse design principles to dignify spaces for Indigenous users: Preliminary observations. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquilina, H., Sweeting, J., Liedel, H., Hovane, V., Williams, V., & Somerville, C. (2009). Evaluation of the Aboriginal sentencing court of Kalgoorlie. Burswood: Shelby Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwood, B., & Markus, A. (Eds.). (1999). The struggle for Aboriginal rights: A documentary history. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Catalogue No. 4513.0—Criminal Courts, Australia, 2015–16, issued March 2, 2017. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/4513.0~2015-16~Main%20Features~Northern%20Territory~16. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.

  • Auty, K. (2009). Room with a view: Courtrooms and culture. Architecture Australia, 98(5), 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, T., Wells, S., & Therese, J. (2006). Aboriginal Darwin: A guide to exploring important sites of the past & present. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt, L., Cunneen, C., & Libesman, T. (2009). Indigenous relations in Australia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, I. (2010). Structuring justice: The third justice environments conference court architecture exhibition. Sydney: Court of the Future Network and Australian Institute of Judicial Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnberg, M., & Kreczmanski, J. (2004). Aboriginal artist dictionary of biographies: Australian Western, Central Desert and Kimberley Region. Marleston: J.B. Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, H. (2016). Crime, Aboriginality and the decolonisation of justice (2nd ed.). Sydney: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawn, G. (2009). The changing face of justice: The architecture of the Australian courthouse. Architecture Australia, 98(5), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, J., & Galligan, B. (1997). Citizens without rights: Aborigines and Australian citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Evans, G., Stokols, D., & Krantz, D. (2013). Behavior, health, and environmental stress. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (1991). Royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody, national report (Vol. 1–5). Canberra: Australian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper v Stuart (1889) 14 AC 286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., Baldry, E., Brown, D., Brown, M., Schwartz, M., & Steel, A. (2013). Penal culture and hyperincarceration: The revival of the prison. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., & Schwartz, M. (2009). Civil and family law needs of Indigenous people. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 32(3), 725–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., & Tauri, J. (2016). Indigenous criminology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Langton, M. (2016). It’s our country: Indigenous arguments for meaningful constitutional recognition and reform. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K. (2000). Myth and media: Constructing Aboriginal architecture. Journal of Architectural Education, 54(1), 2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1984). Environmental stress. Pittsburg: Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., & McCoy, J. (1998). When buildings don’t work: The role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findley, L. (2005). Building change: Architecture, politics and cultural agency. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R., Steg, L., & Reser, J. (2011). Environmental psychology. In P. Martin, F. Cheung, M. Knowles, M. Kyrios, J. Overmier, & J. Prieto (Eds.). IAAP handbook of applied psychology. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell: 440–470.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Go-Sam, C. (2008). Working with and against Indigenous design paradigms. Architecture Australia, 97(5), 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. (2008). Towards safer and more congruent prison environments for Aboriginal prisoners: A South Australian study. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. (2009). Port Augusta courts. Architecture Australia, 98(5), 86–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P. (2009). The children’s Koori Court in Victoria. https://www.magistratescourt.vic.gov.au/sites/default/…/kc_legal%2Bprac%2Bguide.p. Accessed 15 June 2017.

  • Grant, E. (2011). Whyalla Aboriginal children and family centre: Indigenous design considerations. Report to Department of Transport, Energy and Infrastructure. Adelaide: Department of Education and Children’s Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. (2015). An international overview of the initiatives to accommodate Indigenous prisoners. In Y. Jewkes, J. Bennett, & B. Crewe (Eds.), Handbook on prisons (2nd ed., pp. 340–358). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E., & Anthony, T. (2015). Kununurra courthouse. Australian Design Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E., Colbung, M., & Green, I. (2015). Architecture for Aboriginal children and families: A post-occupancy evaluation of the Taikurrendi, Gabmididi Manoo and Ngura Yadurirn Aboriginal Children and Family Centres. Adelaide: The University of Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E., & Greenop, K. (2018). Affirming and reaffirming Indigenous presence: Contemporary Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community, public and institutional architecture in Australia. In E. Grant, K. Greenop, A. Refiti, & D. Glenn (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary Indigenous architecture (pp. 57–106). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E., & Memmott, P. (2008). The case for single cells and alternative ways of viewing custodial accommodation for Australian Aboriginal peoples. The Flinders Journal of Law Reform, 10(3), 631–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E., Rowden, E., & Taitz, M. (2011). Evaluating the cultural responsiveness of the design of an Aboriginal court complex for Aboriginal users: Post occupancy evaluation of the Port Augusta court complex. Presentation to the 24th Annual Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology (ANZSOC) Conference: Crime and the regions: From the local to regional, national and international, September 28–30, 2011, Geelong, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardenbergh, D., Tobin, R., & Yeh, C. (1991). The courthouse: A planning and design guide for court facilities. National Center for State Courts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. (2002, July). Interview with Elizabeth Grant.

    Google Scholar 

  • High Court of Australia. (2010a). Artworks of the High Court. http://www.hcourt.gov.au/artworks. Accessed 10 July 2017.

  • High Court of Australia. (2010b). Other law-themed artworks: Rosella Namok. http://www.hcourt.gov.au/artworks/other-law-themed-artworks/today-now-we-all-got-to-go-by-same-laws. Accessed 10 July 2017.

  • Hockings, J. (2009). Brisbane Supreme and District Court. Architecture Australia, 102(2), 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (2009). Historic courts: Between civic memory and a future of hope. Architecture Australia, 98(5), 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judicial Council on Cultural Diversity. (2016). Path to justice: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women’s experience of the courts: A report prepared for the Judicial Council on Cultural Diversity: Canberra: Judicial Council on Cultural Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, C. (1996). Defining single Aboriginal women’s housing needs in central Australia: Dealing with issues of culture, gender and environment. Architectural Theory Review, 1(1), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys, C. (1997). Unearthing ethnoarchitectural types. Transition, 54–55, 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirke, P. (2009a). Kalgoorlie courts project. Architecture Australia, 98(5), 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirke, P. (2009b). The shelter of law: Designing with communities for a culture of natural justice. Perth: Friend Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirke, P. (2010). Kalgoorlie courts project. In Proceedings from the structuring justice: The third justice environments. Conference Court Architecture Exhibition, May 20–22, 2010 (pp. 28–30). http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/138187/SJ_web.pdf, 2010. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.

  • Law Reform Commission of Western Australia. (1999). Court perspectives: Architecture, psychology and law reform in Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochert, M. (1997). Mediating Aboriginal architecture. Transition, 54, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E. (2012). Australian Indigenous sentencing courts: Restoring culture in the sentencing court process. In J. Bolitho, J. Bruce, & G. Mason (Eds.), Restorative justice and emerging practice (pp. 101–132). Sydney: Sydney Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. (2009) The State of Justice—2009 (Opening Address, Law Week, Supreme Court of Western Australia, September 14, 2009). http://www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/_files/Law_Week_Address_14_Sept_09.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2017.

  • McGaw, J., & Pieris, A. (2014). Assembling the centre: Architecture for Indigenous cultures: Australia and beyond. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, J., & Pieris, A. (2015). Assembling the centre: Architecture for Indigenous cultures, Australia and beyond. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, K. (1996). Racial discrimination and the unilateral extinguishment of native title. Australian Indigenous Law Reporter, 1, 181–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memmott, P. (1996). From the curry to the weal: Aboriginal town camps and compounds of the western back-blocks. Fabrications, 7(1), 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memmott, P. (2007). Towards contemporary Aboriginal architecture. In P. Memmott (Ed.), Gunyah, Goondie + Wurley: The Aboriginal Architecture of Australia (pp. 284–312). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memmott, P., & C. Keys. (2017). The emergence of an architectural anthropology in Aboriginal Australia: The work of the Aboriginal Environments Research Centre. Architectural Theory Review, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memmott, P., & Keys, C. (2014). Translating the design of behaviour settings for Aboriginal well-being. In Translation 31st Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand: Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand. Auckland: SAHANZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memmott, P., & Keys, C. (2015). Redefining architecture to accommodate cultural difference: Designing for cultural sustainability. Architectural Science Review, 58(4), 278–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memmott, P., & Long, S. (2002). Place theory and place maintenance in Indigenous Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 20(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memmott, P., & Reser, J. (2000). Design concepts and processes for public Aboriginal architecture. Paper, 55–56, 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milpurrurru v Indofurn Pty Ltd. (1994). 30 IPR 209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, R. (2003). Enduring signs and obscure meanings: Contested coats of arms in Australian jurisdictions. In A. Wagner, T. Summerfield, & F. Benevides (Eds.), Contemporary issues of the semiotics of law (pp. 180–195). Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (2016). Architecting Aboriginal access to justice: The courts as doors to the law. Flinders Law Journal, 18(2), 269–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nield, L., & Nield, A. (2015). New Kununurra courthouse. Architecture Australia, 104(3), 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. (2000). Living spaces: Gurung Gunya: A new dwelling in Margo. In S. Kleinert & M. Neale (Eds.), The Oxford companion to Aboriginal art and culture (p. 423). Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieris, A. (2012). Occupying the centre: Indigenous presence in the Australian capital city. Postcolonial Studies, 15(2), 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieris, A. (2016). Indigenous cultural centers and museums: An illustrated international survey. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieris, A., Tootell, N., McGaw, J., Johnson, F., & Berg, R. (2014). Indigenous place: Contemporary buildings, landmarks and places of significance in south east Australia and beyond. Melbourne: Melbourne School of Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, E. (2012). Introduction: Making Indigenous place in the Australian city. Postcolonial Studies, 15(2), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, L. (1995). Foreword. In J. Peters & M. Peters (Eds.), Virginia’s historic courthouses (p. ix). Richmond: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. (2001). The Nunga Court: A descriptive study of Aboriginal sentencing day. Honours thesis, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Referendum Council. (2017). Uluru statement from the heart. https://www.refendumcouncil.org.au/sites/default/files/2017-05/Uluru_Statement_From_The_Heart_0.PDF. Accessed 3 July 2017.

  • Reser, J. P. (1992). The design of safe and humane police cells: A discussion of some issues relating to Aboriginal people in police custody, Research Paper No. 9. In D. Biles & D. McDonald (Eds.), The research papers of the criminology unit of the royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody (pp. 160–206). Canberra: Australian Institutie of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, J., & Curtis, D. (2011). Representing justice: Invention, controversy and rights in city-states and democratic courtrooms. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowden, E., & Jones, D. (2015). Design, dignity and due process: The construction of the Coffs Harbour Courthouse. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872115612954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding, N. (2012). The enclosure of justice: Courthouse architecture, due process, and the dead metaphor of trial. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 4, 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syron, G. (2017, August 2). Correspondence with Elizabeth Grant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. (2012). Representing justice: Architecture and the New Zealand Supreme Court. Master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarra River Protection (Wilip-gin Birrarung murron) Bill 2017 (Vic).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian R. Murphy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Murphy, J.R., Grant, E., Anthony, T. (2018). Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia: Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency. In: Grant, E., Greenop, K., Refiti, A., Glenn, D. (eds) The Handbook of Contemporary Indigenous Architecture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6903-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6904-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics