Skip to main content

Computing the Shapley Value of Threshold Cardinality Matching Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Game Theory and Applications (China GTA 2016, China-Dutch GTA 2016)

Abstract

The Shapley value is one of the most important solutions on the scheme of distributing the profits among agents in cooperative games. In this paper, we discuss the computational and complexity issues on the Shapley value in a particular multi-agent domain, a threshold cardinality matching game (TCMG). We show that the Shapley value can be calculated in polynomial time when graphs are restricted to some special graphs, such as linear graphs and the graphs having clique or coclique modules decomposition. For general graphs, we prove that calculating the Shapley value is #P-complete when the threshold is a constant.

The work is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 11271341 and 11501316).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aziz, H., Brandt, F., Harrenstein, P.: Monotone cooperative games and their threshold versions. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonormous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 1107–1114 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz, H., Keijzer, B.D.: Shapley meets Shapley. In: 31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2014), Lyon, France, pp. 99–111 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bacher, R.: Determinants of matrices related to the Pascal triangle. J. de thorie des nombres de Bordeaux 14, 19–41 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Biro, R., Kern, W., Paulusma, D.: Computing solutions for matching games. Int. J. Game Theory 41(1), 75–90 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bousquet, N.: The Shapley value of matching games on trees. Manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deng, X., Papadimitriou, C.H.: On the complexity of cooperative solution concepts. Math. Oper. Res. 19(2), 257–266 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng, X., Ibaraki, T., Nagamochi, H.: Algorithmic aspects of the core of combinatorial optimization games. Math. Oper. Res. 24(3), 751–766 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Elkind, E., Goldberg, L.A., Goldberg, P., Wooldridge, M.: Computational complexity of weighted threshold games. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 22, p. 718 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fang, Q., Li, B., Sun, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, J.: Computing the least-core and nucleolus for threshold cardinality matching games. In: Liu, T.-Y., Qi, Q., Ye, Y. (eds.) WINE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8877, pp. 474–479. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kalai, E., Zemel, E.: Totally balanced games and games of flow. Math. Oper. Res. 7(3), 476–478 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kern, W., Paulusma, D.: Matching games: the least-core and the nucleolus. Math. Oper. Res. 28(2), 294–308 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsui, Y., Matsui, T.: A survey of algorithms for calculating power indices of weighted majority games. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan 43, 71–86 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsui, Y., Matsui, T.: NP-completeness for calculating power indices of weighted majority games. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 263(1), 305–310 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Provan, J.S., Ball, M.O.: The complexity of counting cuts and of computing the probability that a graph is connected. SIAM J. Comput. 12(4), 777–788 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Roy, S.K., Mula, P., Mondal, S.N.: A new solution concept in credibilistic game. CiiT J. Fuzzy Syst. 3(3), 115–120 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shapley, L.S.: A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. II, pp. 307–317. Princeton University Press (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shapley, L.S., Shubik, M.: The assignment game I: the core. Int. J. Game Theory 1, 111–130 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Solymosi, T., Raghavan, T.E.S.: An algorithm for finding the nucleolus of assignment games. Int. J. Game Theory 23(2), 119–143 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ueda, S., Kitaki, M., Iwasaki, A., Yokoo, M.: Concise characteristic function representations in coalitional games based on agent types. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) Proceeding of 22nd IJCAI, pp. 393–399. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Winter, E.: The Shapley value. In: Aumann, R.J., Hart, S. (eds.) Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 3, pp. 2025–2054. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, L., Chen, X., Fang, Q. (2017). Computing the Shapley Value of Threshold Cardinality Matching Games. In: Li, DF., Yang, XG., Uetz, M., Xu, GJ. (eds) Game Theory and Applications. China GTA China-Dutch GTA 2016 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 758. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6753-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6753-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6752-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6753-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics