Abstract
As populations and economies grow, a megatrend that will increasingly affect both developed and emerging economies is the policy trade -off between managing water resources and achieving food security objectives. This policy trade-off is very relevant in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, which represent some of the most water scarce regions of the world and are also intent on achieving food security through domestic agriculture production. We offer a case study on the policy options for reducing water consumption while maintaining food security and farmer welfare in the GCC’s largest country, Saudi Arabia . Specifically, we explore how crop substitution can reduce aggregate water use without compromising the current level of food security or farmer welfare. Additionally, we assess the potential social implications of crop substitution options in order to better understand the political feasibility of various policy choices. The results suggest that if water usage is to be minimised while maintaining food production and farmer welfare , then the primary candidates for reduction are crops or livestock with large water intensity and low revenue and/or low production. Eliminating these types of crops would yield higher water savings than moderate reductions across a large portfolio of crops at the lowest political cost.
References
Almarai Farming Division (2010) Farming in the desert [PDF slideshow]. Retrieved from http://www.organicpastoral.co.nz/site/organic/images/Desert.pdf
Al-Shayaa MS, Baig MB, Straquadine GS (2012) Agricultural extension in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: difficult present and demanding future. J Anim Plant Sci 22(1):239–246. ISSN: 1018-7081
Arab Organization for Agricultural Development (2013) Arab agriculture statistics year book (vol 33). Retrieved 2015 from League of Arab States Arab Organization for Agriculture Development website: http://www.aoad.org/
Arrow KJ (1950) A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J Polit Econ 58(4)
Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Yale University Press, New Haven (1963, second edition)
Bankes S, Wise B (2015) Non-spatial probabilistic condorcet election methodology. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.02509
Becker GS (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Q J Econ 98:371–400
Berger J (2010) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer, Berlin
Black D (1948) On the rationale of group decision-making. J Polit Econ 56:23–34
British Petroleum (2015) BP statistical review of world energy. Retrieved from British Petroleum website: http://www.bp.com
Brown A, Matlock D (2011) A review of water scarcity indices and methodologies (White Paper #106). University of Arkansas: The Sustainability Consortium
Bunge J, King C (2015) Bunge, Saudi venture to buy 50.1% stake in Canadian Wheat Board. Wall Street J. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com
Caritat MJAN (1785) Essay on the application of analysis to the probability of majority decisions
Coughlin PJ (1992) Probabilistic voting theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Downs A (1957) An economic theory of political action in a democracy. J Polit Econ 65(2):135–150
Enelow JM, Hinich MJ (1990) Advances in the spatial theory of voting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2002) The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2001. FAO, Rome, Italy
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) Food and Agriculture Data [FAOSTAT]. Retrieved Aug 11, 2015, from http://faostat.fao.org
General Authority for Statistics Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2015) Annual yearbook 2015. Retrieved 2015 from The General Authority for Statistics website: https://www.stats.gov.sa/en
Gustafson RL (1958) Implications of recent research on optimal storage rules. J Farm Econ 40(2):290–300
Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57
Jeffreys A (2011) The report: Saudi Arabia 2010. Oxford Business Group, United Kingdom
Lippman TW (2010) Saudi Arabia’s quest for food security. Middle East Policy 17(1):123–231. doi:10.1111/j.14754967.2010.00428.x
Matar W, Murphy F, Pierru A, Rioux B, Wogan D (2017) Efficient industrial energy use: the first step in transitioning Saudi Arabia’s energy mix. Energy Policy 105:80–92
Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2010) The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products. Volume 2: Appendices. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education
Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2012) The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22:123–231. doi:10.5194/hess-16-179-2012
Ministry of Agriculture (2014) Agriculture statistical year book, Issue #27. Agricultural Research and Development Affairs, Saudi Arabia. Retrieved 2015
Moench M (2002) Water and the potential for social instability: livelihoods, migration and the building of society. Nat Resour Forum 26(3):195–204. doi:10.1111/0165-0203.00021
Mousa H (2015) Grain and feed annual (GAIN Report No. SA1502). USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Embassy Riyadh
Multsch S, Al-Rumaikhani YA, Frede HG, Breuer L (2013) A site-specific agricultural water requirement and footprint estimator (SPARE: WATER 1.0). Geosci Model Dev Discuss 6(1):645–684. doi:10.5194/gmdd-6-645-2013
Negishi T (1972) General equilibrium theory and international trade. North-Holland Publishing Company
Sadik A, El-Solh M, Saab N (2014) Food security: challenges and prospects. Arab Environment 7, Retrieved from http://www.afedonline.org/Report2014/E/p01-11%20eng%20preface.pdf
Sen A (1982) The food problem: theory and policy. Third World Q 4(3):447–459. doi:10.1080/01436598208419641
Vincent P (2008) Saudi Arabia: an environmental overview. Taylor & Francis/Belkema, The Netherlands
Wise B, Lester L, Efird B (2015) Multi-dimensional bargaining in KTAB. KAPSARC, Saudi Arabia
Woertz E (2013) Oil for food: the global food crisis and the Middle East. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom
World Bank (2015) World development indicators, [DataBank]. Retrieved Aug, 2, 2015, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?Code=SP.POP.TOTL&id=af3ce82b&report_name=Popular_indicators&populartype=series&ispopular=y#
World Trade Organization (2011) Trade policy review report by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Report Paper No. 256). Retrieved from World Trade Organization website: https://www.wto.org
Zermelo, E. (1928). Die Berechnung der Turnier-Ergebnisse als ein Maximumproblem der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Math Z 29, 1929, S. pp 436–460
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mathieu Carey and Berenice Garcia Tellez for their research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Table 12.3 includes production values referenced from Saudi Arabia Ministry of Agriculture, Water Footprint data from (Multsch et al. 2013). Revenue data were extracted from the FAO’s statistics database (FAO 2015). Data exceptions include Water footprint data for cabbages, eggs, fresh fruits, milk (cow, camel and goat), meat (camel, chicken cow, goat and sheep) , honey, nuts, and pulses), which extracted from (Mekonnen and Hoekstra 2010).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Napoli, C., Wise, B., Wogan, D., Yaseen, L. (2018). Policy Options for Reducing Water for Agriculture in Saudi Arabia. In: Biswas, A., Tortajada, C., Rohner, P. (eds) Assessing Global Water Megatrends. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6695-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6695-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6694-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6695-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)