Skip to main content

Predictive Sampler Design for Haptic Signals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 748))

Abstract

In this chapter, we study various possible structures of perceptually adaptive sampling strategies for one-dimensional haptic signal. For that purpose, an experimental setup is designed where we record haptic responses extensively for several users. The responses are labeled as perceived (+1) or non-perceived (\(-1\)). After that, various classifiers are designed to predict the labels of the responses. We have applied several different classifiers based on Weber’s law, level crossing, linear regression, decision tree, and random forest . The classifiers based on the level crossing and the Weber’s law as features have good accuracy (more than 90%) and are only marginally inferior to random forests. The level crossing classifier consistently outperforms the one based on the Weber’s law even though the difference is small. Given their simple parametric form, the level crossing and the Weber’s law based classifiers are shown to be good candidates to be used for adaptive sampling. We have studied their rate–distortion performances and demonstrated that the level crossing sampler is superior. In summary, we have demonstrated that both the level crossing and the Weber classifier-based samplers are good candidates for the perceptually adaptive sampling mechanism for haptic data reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brill MH (1983) Weber’s law and perceptual categories: another teleological view. Bull Math Biol 45(1):139–142

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dabeer O, Chaudhuri S (2011) Analysis of an adaptive sampler based on Weber’s law. IEEE Trans Signal Process 59(4):1868–1878. doi:10.1109/TSP.2010.2101071

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble EAM (1898) The applicability of Weber’s law to smell. Am J Psychol 10(1):82–142. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1412679

  • Hapi Reference (2012). www.h3dapi.org

  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley-Interscience

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlecek P (2011) Overview of current developments in haptic APIs. In: Proceedings of CESCG

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S (1984) Optimization by simulated annealing: quantitative studies. J Stat Phys 34(5):975–986

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: IJCAI, pp 1137–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TM (1997) Machine learning. McGraw-Hill, McGraw Hill series in computer science

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore B (2007) Cochelear hearing loss: psychological and technical issues. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshen LBJFR, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Phantom Omni Device Reference (2012). www.sensable.com/haptic-phantom-omni.htm

  • Rosner B, Glynn RJ, Lee MLT (2005) The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data. Biometrics 62(1):185–192

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Silva A, Ramirez O, Vega V, Oliver J (2009) Phantom omni haptic device: kinematic and manipulability. In: Electronics, robotics and automotive mechanics conference, 2009. CERMA ’09, pp 193–198, doi:10.1109/CERMA.2009.55

  • Snyman J (2005) Practical mathematical optimization: an introduction to basic optimization theory and classical and new gradient-based algorithms, vol 97. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreeni K, Chaudhuri S (2012) Haptic rendering of dense 3D point cloud data. In: IEEE haptics symposium (HAPTICS), pp 333–339. doi:10.1109/HAPTIC.2012.6183811

  • Stiles W (1978) Mechanisms of colour vision. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhasis Chaudhuri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaudhuri, S., Bhardwaj, A. (2018). Predictive Sampler Design for Haptic Signals. In: Kinesthetic Perception. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 748. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6692-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6692-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6691-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6692-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics