Advertisement

The Implementation of Catholic Social Teaching in Taiwan

Chapter
Part of the Christianity in Modern China book series (CMC)

Abstract

Three aspects of the implementation of social teachings are investigated in this chapter. Four major findings emerged. Firstly, the organizational-ecological profile of the Church, namely too many too small organizations, has seriously limited aspects of the implementation; secondly, church authority and religious piety are the major positive forces on its assertion of Life/Family values, regardless of the strength of state regulations. It is the model of the Church’s civil engagement from the early 1960s till today. Thirdly, an appreciable level of Human Rights-related participation is also found. The major factor is church authority and the laity’s support. A healthy interaction pattern among external and internal actors is identified to be the major social mechanism in this aspect. Fourthly, implementation related to Social Justice is quite limited and the Church’s future stance on this is still ambiguous.

Keywords

Social Education Church Authorities Church's Social Teaching Social justiceJustice Prophetic Role 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Casanova, Jose. 1996. “Global Catholicism and the Politics of Civil Society.” Sociological Inquiry 66.3, 356–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Catholic Human Rights Committee. 1989. Issue on Fr. Neil Magill. Taipei: Kuang-chi Cultural Group.Google Scholar
  3. Cheng, Tun-Jen and Deborah A. Brown, eds. 2006. Religious Organizations and Democratization: Case Studies from Contemporary Asia, East Gate Book. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  4. Chinese Catholic Culture [Zhongguo tianzhujiao wenhua], 1974, vol. 1, 14, April.Google Scholar
  5. Chinese Catholic Cultural Association (CCCA). 1990. “fandui duotai hefa hua [Against the Legalization of Abortion].” In Special Issue on Fiftieth Anniversary of Chinese Catholic Cultural Association [Zhongguo tianzhujiao wehhua xie jin hui chuanli wushi zhounian jinian tekan], 106–121. Taipei: Chinese Catholic Cultural Association.Google Scholar
  6. Chinese Regional Bishops’ Conference (CRBC). 1972. Minutes of the General Assembly of CRBC. Taipei: Catholic Church Affairs Committee.Google Scholar
  7. Chinese Regional Bishops’ Conference (CRBC). 1978. “A Draft on Constructing the Chinese Church [Jianshe zhongguo defang jiaohui caoan].” In Constructing the Chinese Church, 101–142. Taiwan: Catholic Church Affairs Committee.Google Scholar
  8. Chinese Regional Bishops’ Conference (CRBC). 1989. “Pastoral Letter of CRBC 1989/5/21.” CRBC Monthly Bulletin, No. 126.Google Scholar
  9. Chinese Regional Bishops’ Conference (CRBC). 2002. Conference of “New Century, New Evangelization”: Pastoral and Resolutions (shinshrji shinfuchuan dahuei: muhan her jiueyi an). Taibei: the Secretariat of CRBC.Google Scholar
  10. Chinese Regional Bishops’ Conference (CRBC). 2014a. “Minutes of General Assembly of CRBC Autumn 2013.” CRBC Monthly Bulletin, No. 333.Google Scholar
  11. Chinese Regional Bishops’ Conference (CRBC). 2014b. “CRBC Pastoral Letter Reply to the Bill on Multi-Facet Family System.” CRBC Monthly Bulletin, No. 334.Google Scholar
  12. Chinese Regional Bishops’ Conference (CRBC). 2014c. CRBC Monthly Bulletin, No. 335.Google Scholar
  13. Chinese Regional Bishops’ Conference (CRBC). 2015. Qingzhu xianshen shenghuo nian. Celebrating the Year of Dedication CRBC Pastoral Letter.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, Philip and Charles B. Jones, eds. 2003. Religion in Modern Taiwan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  15. Collectanea Theologica. 1970. vol. 6, 598.Google Scholar
  16. Commission for Evangelization (CRBC). 1987. A Study of the Catholic Church in Taiwan, ROC. Taipei: Kuang-chi Cultural Group.Google Scholar
  17. Commission for Evangelization (CRBC), ed. 1988. “Zhongguo tianzhujiao fuyin chuanbo dahui xuanyan. [Declaration on Chinese Catholic Evangelization].” In Album on Evangelization Assembly [Fu shuan dahui zhuanji.] Taipei: Kuang-chi Cultural Group.Google Scholar
  18. Curran, Charles E. and Richard A. McCormick, S.J. 1986. Readings in Moral Theology No. 5: Official Catholic Social Teaching. New York/Mahwah: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gold, Thomas B. 1997. Taiwan: Still Defying the Odds. In Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Regional Challenges, edited by Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu, and Hung-mao Tien, pp. 161–191. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hao, Zhidong et al. 2014. “Catholicism and Its Civic Engagement: Case Studies of the Catholic Church in Hong Kong, Macau, Taipei, and Shanghai.” In Review of Religion and Chinese Society, 48–77.Google Scholar
  21. Hornsby-Smith, Michael P. 2006. An Introduction to Catholic Social Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. Democracy’s Third Wave. Journal of Democracy 2 (2), 11–34, Spring 1991.Google Scholar
  23. Kuo Cheng-tian. 2008. Religion and Democracy in Taiwan. Place: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kuo Wen-ban. 1999. Taiwan tianzhujiao de chengjiao guanxi [Taiwan’s Catholic-government relations], Report on Research Program, No. NSC87-2412-H005A-004 National Science Council, Executive Yuen.Google Scholar
  25. Kuo Wen-ban. 2010. Social Investigation Report on the diocese of Hsinchu [Xinzhu jiaoqu shehui diaocha baogao] (Private report for Hsinchu Diocese).Google Scholar
  26. Lei Huamin, Chen Xinji, eds. 1986. Koumi Fujian: Lei Huamin huiyilu [Mouth with Honey Belly with Sword: Memoirs of Lei Huamin]. Taipei: Yiqiao chubanshe.Google Scholar
  27. Li Zhen. 1978. “Local Church and Social Service [Difang jiaohui yu shehui fuwu].” In fengyupiaoyao hua jiaohui [The Church in Tossing Wind and Rain], 8–25. Tainan: Window Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lokuang. 1996a. “Social Problems of Taiwan [Taiwan de shehui wenti].” Mulu Wenji 2 (1961–1966), 255–270.Google Scholar
  29. Lokuang. 1996b. “Evangelism and Social Development [Chuanbo fuyin yu tsujin shehuifazhan].” Mulu Wenji 3 (1966–1978), 293–318.Google Scholar
  30. Madsen, Richard. 2012. “Taiwan tianzhujiaohui de chengzhang yu shuaitui: yi ma li nuohui de liang ge chuanjiao qu weili [The Spectacular Growth and Precipitous Decline of the Catholic Church in Taiwan].” Journal of Taiwan Studies 6, 53–76.Google Scholar
  31. Madsen, Richard. 2007. Democracy’s Dharma: Religious Renaissance and Political Development in Taiwan. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Noonan, John T. Jr. 1993. “A Church that Can and Cannot Change: The Development of Catholic Moral Teaching.” Theological Studies, 54 (1993): 662–677.Google Scholar
  33. Palacios, Joseph M. 2007. The Catholic Social Imagination, Activism and the Just Society in Mexico and the United States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (PCJP). 2004. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Google Scholar
  35. Robertson, Roland. 2003. The Conceptual Promise of Glocalization: Commonality and Diversity. http://artefact.mi2.hr/_a04/lang_en/theory_robertson_en.htm, accessed on 2016/5/10.
  36. Schuck, Michael Joseph. 1991. That They Be One: The Social Teaching of the Papal Encyclicals, 1740–1989. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Shan Guoxi. 2010. PK; Opinion on Death Penalty, Sixing cun fei guannian PK4: Full text on interviewing Cardinal Shan Guoxi on Death Penalty. http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2010/06/11/%E6%AD%BB%E5%88%91%E5%AD%98%E5%BB%A2%E2%80%A7%E8%A7%80%E5%BF%B5pk%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%975%E5%A4%A9%E4%B8%BB%E6%95%99%E5%96%AE%E5%9C%8B%E7%92%BD%E6%A8%9E%E6%A9%9F%E8%AB%87%E5%BB%A2%E9%99%A4%E6%AD%BB/, accessed on January 23, 2017.
  38. Shen Muhua. 2015. “Zhan hou Taiwan tianzhujiao jiceng xiuhui de laogong muling shijian: yi Gu shangjie yu Mahejun shenfu wei hexinde kaocha. [Fr. José Ellacuría, Fr. Neil Magill, Labor Education, Independent Labor Union Movement, Pastoral Practices of Catholic Church].” Master thesis, Graduate School of Sociology, National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar
  39. Su Na-zhou. 2012. “ererba quanhuai gongzuo zhong xian wei renzhi de yongzhe-wenriwu hui. [An unknown brave person in the concern of 28 February—Then thousands of days without remorse].” In The Wilderness: Kuangye A record of events of twenty-five years. vol. 176. http://www.cap.org.tw/W/w-176-1.html, accessed on January 23, 2017.
  40. Vox Cleri Monthly. 1975. “A Survey on the Research on Taiwan Catholic society of Economic Development [Taiwan tianzhujiao shejing fazhan gongzuo yanjiu diaocha zhuanji].” Vox Cleri Monthly 13.2, (the whole issue is on this special topic).Google Scholar
  41. Wei Wei. 2009. “Practices and Reflections on the Care and concern of Migrant Workers’ Rights in the Catholic Church in Taiwan [Dui yi gongren quan de shou ling guanhuai Taiwan tianzhujiao hui de zuofa yu xingsi].” Collectanea Theologica 158, 618–637.Google Scholar
  42. Ye Weimin, Liu Yuhua. 1982. “Recent Development on Birth Control with Natural Method, [Ziran jieyu de jinkuang].” Collectanea Theologica 52, 281–298.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyNational Taipei UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations