Skip to main content

Multi-criteria Rating Using Fuzzy Ranking for Improving Soil Recommendation System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICT Based Innovations

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 653))

  • 686 Accesses

Abstract

The fuzzy methodology in light of Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) system for selecting the ideal answer for enhancing creation in the field of agribusiness by selecting the ideal soil for a specific crop with a set of linguistic variables of the well-known AHP methods by the ratings of each dimension of fuzzy matrix and the overall rating of soil. The majority of the crops need very much depleted; salt-free soils and lean toward very much drained medium-textured soil with ideal physical properties; and impartial pH as soil has ideal physical, chemical, and natural properties; therefore soil suitability standard issues appear to be a nonappearance of capacity and assessment from every angle. Personalization advancements and recommenders framework help to beat the issues by giving customized proposals for farmers according to the suitability of data. The present investigation is utilized to calculate normalized weight using defuzzified value or crisp value and to create a rating of crops for the recommendation system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Addeo, G., Guastadisegni, G., Pisante, M.: Land and Water Quality for Sustainable and Precision. I World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, Madrid (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sałabun, Wojciech.: Application of the Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method to Identify Nonlinear Decision Models. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 89(15), 1–6 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ma, Jun., Zhang, Guangquan., Jie, Lu.: A fuzzy hierarchical multiple criteria group decision support system-decider and its applications. Springer Fuzziness and Soft Computing 267, 383–403 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Santos, F.J.J., Camargo, H.A.: Fuzzy Systems for Multicriteria Decision Making. CLEI Electronic J. 13(3), 1–8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kihoro, J., Bosco, N.J., Murage, H.: Suitability analysis for rice growing sites using a multicriteria evaluation and GIS approach in great mwea region, Kenya. Springer 12(3), 1–24 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beek, K.J., Burrough, P.A., McCormack, D.E.: Quantified land evaluation procedures. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 151(1), 74 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burrough, P.A.: Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. J. Soil Sci. 40(3), 477–492 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Komatsuzaki, Masakazu., Ohta, Hiroyuki.: Soil management practices for sustainable agro-ecosystem. Springer Sustainability Sci. 2(1), 103–120 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A.: Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage. Sci. 17(4), 141–164 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng, Hepu.: Multi-criteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2, 726–731 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kabir, G., Hasin, M.A.A.: Comparative analysis of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for multicriteria inventory classification. Int J. Fuzzy Logic Syst 1(1), 1–16 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Z.X., Mo, Y.N.: Ranking Fuzzy numbers based on ideal solution. Fuzzy Inf Eng. 2(1), 27–36 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Edwards, J.H., Wood, C.W., Thurlow, D.L., Ruf, M.E.: Tillage and crop rotation effects on fertility status of a Hapludalf soil. Soil Sci. 56, 1577–1582 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, Xin-Wang., Han, Shi-Lian.: Ranking Fuzzy numbers with preference weighting function expectations. Elsevier Comput. Mathematics Appl. 49, 1731–1753 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Buckley, J.J.: Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making Advances in Risk Analysis 4, 389–401 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Palanivel, K., Sivakumar, R.: Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approach for collaborative recommender systems. Int J Compu Theory Eng. 2(1), 57–63 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boender, C.G.E., de Graan, J.G., Lootsma, F.A.: Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 29, 133–143 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babita Chaudhary .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chaudhary, B., Dahiya, S. (2018). Multi-criteria Rating Using Fuzzy Ranking for Improving Soil Recommendation System. In: Saini, A., Nayak, A., Vyas, R. (eds) ICT Based Innovations. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 653. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6602-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6602-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6601-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6602-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics