Abstract
The increasing prominence of comparative work in education exemplified by the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has influenced policymaking in many countries, particularly in Australia and Germany. However, much analysis and reporting of PISA tends to be highly abstract and sweeps aside complex questions and contextual understanding. This chapter adopts a comparative approach which emphasises the Australian and German context and exposes the education system structures which significantly impact student achievement and their experiences of school . The character of comprehensive provision within Australia’s secondary or high schools and Germany’s Gesamtschule or comprehensive schooling and ‘Schularten mit mehreren Bildungsgängen’ or schools with various learning pathways will be explored. The chapter concludes by reaffirming the benefit and explanatory power of comparative education research which takes the complexities of context into account and uses this to meaningfully inform education policymaking and reform.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2015). Schools in Australia. 4221.0.
Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung. (2014). Bildung in Deutschland 2014. Germany.
Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung. (2016). Bildung in Deutschland 2016. Germany.
Bieber, T., Niemann, D., & Martens, K. (2014). Soft governance through PISA benchmarking. In N. Romuald & M. Lawn (Eds.), Shaping of European education. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility. Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. In Sage studies in social and educational change (Vol. 5). London: Sage Publications.
Bude, H. (2011). Bildungspanik. Was unsere Gesellschaft Spaltet. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Deckert-Peaceman, H. (2005). Starting school in Germany: The relationship between education and social inequality. In AARE Conference Paper, Western Sydney.
Duru-Bellat, M., & Suchaut, B. (2005). Organisation and context, efficiency and equity of education systems: What PISA tells us. European Educational Research Journal, 4, N3.
Füller, C. (2011). Nach dem PISA shock: Zehn Jahre Wirrwarr. Spiegel Online.
Hunjan, R., & Blumer, C. (2016). Australian schools are in ‘absolute decline’ globally, says PISA report. ABC Online. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-06/australian-school-performance-in-absolute-decline-globally/8098028.
Killus, D. (2014). Sind Privatschulen besser als öffentliche Schulen?—Erwartungen und Erfahrungen aus Sicht von Eltern. In D. Killus & K. J. Tillman (Eds.), Eltern zwischen Erwartungen, Kritik und Engagement. Ein Trendbericht zu Schule und Bildungspolitik. München: Waxmann.
Klieme, E., Jude, N., Baumert, J., & Prenzel, M. (2010). PISA 2000–2009: Bilanz der Veränderung im Schulsystem. In E. Klieme, C. Artelt, J. Hartig, N. Jude, O. Köller, et al. (Eds.), PISA 2009 Bilanz nach einem Jahrzent. München: Waxmann.
Lamb, S., Jackson, J., Walstab, A., & Huo, S. (2015). Educational opportunity in Australia 2015. Who succeeds and who misses out. Centre for International Research on Education systems, prepared for the Mitchell Institute. Retrieved from http://www.mitchellinstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Educational-opportunity-in-Australia-2015-Who-succeeds-and-who-misses-out-19Nov15.pdf.
Lingard, B. (2016). Rationales for and reception of the OECD’s PISA. Educação and Sociedade, 37(136), 609–627.
Malecki, A. (2016). Schulen auf einen Blick. Statistische Bundesamt. Wiesbaden: Bundesanstalt für Bildung.
Mitter, W., & Shaw, G. (1991). Comprehensive schools in Germany: Concepts, developments and issues. European Journal of Education, 26(2).
OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 results (Volume 1): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: PISA OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 results (Volume 2): Policies and practices for successful schools. Paris: PISA OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Reiss, K., Saelzer, C., Schiepe-Tiska, A., Klieme, E., & Koeller, O. (Eds.). (2016). PISA 2015—Eine Studie zwischen Kontinuitaet und Innovation. München: Waxmann.
Ringer, F. K. (1979). Education and society in modern Europe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ringer, F., Simon, B., & Müller, D. K. (Eds.). (1987). The rise of modern educational systems: Structural change and social reproduction, 1870–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, S. L., & Tieben, N. (2011). A healthy sorting machine? Social inequality in the transition to upper secondary education in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 37(2).
Solga, H., & Wagner, S. (2008). ‘Die Zurückgelassenen - die soziale Verarmung der Lernumwelt von Hauptschülerinnen und Hauptschülern’. In R. Becker & W. Lauterbach (Eds.)., Bildung als Privileg. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Teese, R. (2014). For the common weal: The public high school in Victoria 1910–2010. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
Teese, R. (2000). Academic success and social power. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Tillmann, K. J. (2014). Der Blick der Eltern auf die Bildungspolitik—Kontinuitäten und Veränderungen. In D. Killus & K. J. Tillman (Eds.), Eltern zwischen Erwartungen, Kritik und Engagement. Ein Trendbericht zu Schule und Bildungspolitik in Deutschland.
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2016). PISA 2015: A first look at Australia’s results. Canberra: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Watson, L., & Ryan, C. (2010). Choosers and loosers: The impact of Government subsidies on Australian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 86–107.
Weiß, M. (2011). Allgemeinbildende Privatschulen in Deutschland. Bereicherung oder Gefährdung des öffentlichen Schulwesens? Netzwerk-Bildung Schriftenreihe. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Wiseman, A. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policy-making: Global context and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doecke, E. (2018). The Challenge and Benefit of Comparative Research in Education Systems and the Impact of PISA. In: Nickl, B., Herrschner, I., Goździak, E. (eds) German-Australian Encounters and Cultural Transfers. Global Germany in Transnational Dialogues. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6599-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6599-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6598-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6599-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)