Skip to main content

The Challenge and Benefit of Comparative Research in Education Systems and the Impact of PISA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
German-Australian Encounters and Cultural Transfers

Part of the book series: Global Germany in Transnational Dialogues ((GGTD))

  • 378 Accesses

Abstract

The increasing prominence of comparative work in education exemplified by the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has influenced policymaking in many countries, particularly in Australia and Germany. However, much analysis and reporting of PISA tends to be highly abstract and sweeps aside complex questions and contextual understanding. This chapter adopts a comparative approach which emphasises the Australian and German context and exposes the education system structures which significantly impact student achievement and their experiences of school . The character of comprehensive provision within Australia’s secondary or high schools and Germany’s Gesamtschule or comprehensive schooling and ‘Schularten mit mehreren Bildungsgängen’ or schools with various learning pathways will be explored. The chapter concludes by reaffirming the benefit and explanatory power of comparative education research which takes the complexities of context into account and uses this to meaningfully inform education policymaking and reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2015). Schools in Australia. 4221.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung. (2014). Bildung in Deutschland 2014. Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung. (2016). Bildung in Deutschland 2016. Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, T., Niemann, D., & Martens, K. (2014). Soft governance through PISA benchmarking. In N. Romuald & M. Lawn (Eds.), Shaping of European education. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility. Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. In Sage studies in social and educational change (Vol. 5). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bude, H. (2011). Bildungspanik. Was unsere Gesellschaft Spaltet. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckert-Peaceman, H. (2005). Starting school in Germany: The relationship between education and social inequality. In AARE Conference Paper, Western Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duru-Bellat, M., & Suchaut, B. (2005). Organisation and context, efficiency and equity of education systems: What PISA tells us. European Educational Research Journal, 4, N3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, C. (2011). Nach dem PISA shock: Zehn Jahre Wirrwarr. Spiegel Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunjan, R., & Blumer, C. (2016). Australian schools are in ‘absolute decline’ globally, says PISA report. ABC Online. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-06/australian-school-performance-in-absolute-decline-globally/8098028.

  • Killus, D. (2014). Sind Privatschulen besser als öffentliche Schulen?—Erwartungen und Erfahrungen aus Sicht von Eltern. In D. Killus & K. J. Tillman (Eds.), Eltern zwischen Erwartungen, Kritik und Engagement. Ein Trendbericht zu Schule und Bildungspolitik. München: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klieme, E., Jude, N., Baumert, J., & Prenzel, M. (2010). PISA 2000–2009: Bilanz der Veränderung im Schulsystem. In E. Klieme, C. Artelt, J. Hartig, N. Jude, O. Köller, et al. (Eds.), PISA 2009 Bilanz nach einem Jahrzent. München: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., Jackson, J., Walstab, A., & Huo, S. (2015). Educational opportunity in Australia 2015. Who succeeds and who misses out. Centre for International Research on Education systems, prepared for the Mitchell Institute.  Retrieved from http://www.mitchellinstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Educational-opportunity-in-Australia-2015-Who-succeeds-and-who-misses-out-19Nov15.pdf.

  • Lingard, B. (2016). Rationales for and reception of the OECD’s PISA. Educação and Sociedade, 37(136), 609–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, A. (2016). Schulen auf einen Blick. Statistische Bundesamt. Wiesbaden: Bundesanstalt für Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitter, W., & Shaw, G. (1991). Comprehensive schools in Germany: Concepts, developments and issues. European Journal of Education, 26(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 results (Volume 1): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: PISA OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 results (Volume 2): Policies and practices for successful schools. Paris: PISA OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, K., Saelzer, C., Schiepe-Tiska, A., Klieme, E., & Koeller, O. (Eds.). (2016). PISA 2015—Eine Studie zwischen Kontinuitaet und Innovation. München: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringer, F. K. (1979). Education and society in modern Europe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringer, F., Simon, B., & Müller, D. K. (Eds.). (1987). The rise of modern educational systems: Structural change and social reproduction, 1870–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. L., & Tieben, N. (2011). A healthy sorting machine? Social inequality in the transition to upper secondary education in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 37(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solga, H., & Wagner, S. (2008). ‘Die Zurückgelassenen - die soziale Verarmung der Lernumwelt von Hauptschülerinnen und Hauptschülern’. In R. Becker & W. Lauterbach (Eds.)., Bildung als Privileg. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R. (2014). For the common weal: The public high school in Victoria 1910–2010. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R. (2000). Academic success and social power. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, K. J. (2014). Der Blick der Eltern auf die Bildungspolitik—Kontinuitäten und Veränderungen. In D. Killus & K. J. Tillman (Eds.), Eltern zwischen Erwartungen, Kritik und Engagement. Ein Trendbericht zu Schule und Bildungspolitik in Deutschland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2016). PISA 2015: A first look at Australia’s results. Canberra: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L., & Ryan, C. (2010). Choosers and loosers: The impact of Government subsidies on Australian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 86–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, M. (2011). Allgemeinbildende Privatschulen in Deutschland. Bereicherung oder Gefährdung des öffentlichen Schulwesens? Netzwerk-Bildung Schriftenreihe. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, A. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policy-making: Global context and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Doecke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Doecke, E. (2018). The Challenge and Benefit of Comparative Research in Education Systems and the Impact of PISA. In: Nickl, B., Herrschner, I., Goździak, E. (eds) German-Australian Encounters and Cultural Transfers. Global Germany in Transnational Dialogues. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6599-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6599-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6598-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6599-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics