Skip to main content

German-Australian Research on a Difficult Legacy: Colonial Collections of Indigenous Human Remains in German Museums and Collections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover German-Australian Encounters and Cultural Transfers

Part of the book series: Global Germany in Transnational Dialogues ((GGTD))

Abstract

In recent years, curators of German ethnological and university anatomical museums have begun attempting to resolve the ethical and practical challenges arising from their possession of human remains of Indigenous peoples collected in spheres of colonial ambition during the long nineteenth century. Efforts to assess whether past injustices warrant the return of these remains to their country of origin for reburial has been prompted by Indigenous communities with ancestral ties to these relics requesting their repatriation . In the German context, the largest collections of remains are those of the Indigenous peoples of present day Namibia. However, a number of museums have also found themselves encountering repatriation requests from Indigenous Australian communities. This chapter looks at how the German museum world’s efforts to resolve this difficult legacy has led to collaboration between leading German and Australian museum personnel and scholars with expertise in the history of colonial era collecting of human remains and their repatriation. As the chapter explains, to date this collaboration has largely focused on critically assessing guidelines recommended by the Deutscher Museumsbund, or German Museums Association in late 2003 to its member institutions. Working together, German and Australian experts have drawn attention to how these guidelines—which reflect the experience of German museums dealing with human remains acquired during the Nazi era—have their strengths, but still problematically reflect Eurocentric assumptions about the nature of death, and the relations of the dead to the living.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahrndt, W., Deimel, C., Geissdorf, M., Lenk, C., Roessiger, S., Rosendahl, W., et al. (2013). Recommendations for the care of human remains in museums and collections. Berlin: Deutscher Museumsbund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, H. (2010). The meanings and value of repatriation. In P. Turnbull &  M. Pickering (Eds.), The long journey home: The meanings and values of repatriation (pp. 15–19). Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumslag, N. (2005). Murderous medicine: nazi doctors, human experimentation, and typhus. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCMS. (2005). Department of culture, media and sport: Guidance for the care of human remains in museums. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. (2007). Retrieved March 7, 2017 from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf.

  • FAIRA. (1989). Aborigines, archaeologists and the rights of the dead. In World Archaeological Intercongress, Vermillion, South Dakota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fforde, C., Ormond-Parker L., & Turnbull P. (2015). Repatriation research: Archives and the recovery of history and heritage. In R. R. Cooper (Ed.), Heritage, ancestry and law: Principles, policies and practices in dealing with historical human remains (pp. 39–59). Wells: Institute of Art and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Förster, L., & Fründt, S. (2017). Forum: Human remains in museums and collections. A critical engagement with the ‘recommendations’ of the German Museums Association’. Editorial. H-Solz-Kult: Kommunikation und Fachinformation für die Geschichtswissenschaften 2017. Retrieved March 5, 2017 from http://www.hsozkult.de/debate/id/diskussionen-3909.

  • Griffin, Des. (1996). Previous possessions, new obligations: A commitment by Australian museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 39(1), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanchant, D. (2002). Practicalities in the return of remains: The importance of provenance and the question of unprovenanced remains. In C. Fforde, J. Hubert & P. Turnbull (Eds.), The dead and their possessions: Repatriation in principle, policy and practice (pp. 312–316). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming, S., & Wilson, C. (2010). The ‘first stolen generations’: Repatriation and reburial in Ngarrindjeri Ruwe (country). In P. Turnbull & M. Pickering (Eds.),  The long way home: The meaning and values of repatriation (pp. 183–194). Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, S. (2016). The anatomy of murder: Ethical transgressions and anatomical science during the third reich. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. (2000). Joint statement with Tony Blair on aboriginal remains. PM transcripts, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Retrieved March 7, 2017 from https://plone.unige.ch/art-adr/cases-affaires/17-tasmanian-human-remains-2013-tasmanian-aboriginal-centre-and-natural-history-museum-london/john-howard-media-release-joint-statement-with-tony-blair-on-aboriginal-remains-4-july-2000/view.

  • Hull, I. (2006). Absolute destruction: Military culture and the practices of war in imperial Germany. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, T. (2011). Contesting human remains in museum collections: The crisis of cultural authority. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, T. (2016). Keeping their marbles: How the treasures of the past ended up in museums and why they should stay there. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossler, R. (2015). Namibia and Germany: Negotiating the past. Windhoek: University of Namibia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, N., & Dowling, J. (2003). Report of the working group on human remains. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, J. (1992). Menschenverachtung und Opportunismus: zur Medizin im Dritten Reich. Tübingen: Attempto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. (2016). Colonial legacies: Is repatriation of remains an act of postcolonial justice? In G. Adair & A. Schwarz (Eds.), Postcolonial justice in Australia reassessing the ‘fair go’.  Trier: Bergstraβe WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. (2017). A helping hand? Comments on the ‘Recommendations for the care of human remains in museums and collections’ by the Deutscher Museumsbund (German Museums Association). In H-Soz-Kult. Retrieved February 7, 2017 and March 7, 2017 from http://www.hsozkult.de/debate/id/diskussionen-4000.

  • Pickering, M., & Gordon. P. (2011). Repatriation: The end of the beginning. In D. Griffin & L. Paroissien (Eds.), Understanding museums: Australian museums and museology. National Museum of Australia. Retrieved March 7, 2017 from http://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/MPickering_PGordon_2011.html.

  • Poignant, R. (1992). The grid on contested ground at Pickford’s freight store—Return of Aboriginal bones from the anatomy museum, University of Edinburgh to David Mowaljarlai. Olive Pink Society Bulletin, 4(1), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Return, Reconcile, Renew. (2013). Retrieved March 7, 2017 from http://esrc.unimelb.edu.au/projects/return-reconcile-renew.

  • Schultka, R. (2017). Review: The anatomy of murder: Ethical transgressions and anatomical science during the Third Reich, by Sabine Hildebrandt. Berghahn Books. Annals of Anatomy Anatomischer Anzeiger, 209, 76–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.10.003.

  • Stoecker, H. (2013). Knochen im Depot. Namibische Schädel in anthropologischen Sammlungen aus der Kolonialzeit. In  J. Zimmerer (ed.), Kein Platz an der Sonne. Erinnerungsorte der deutschen Kolonialgeschichte (pp. 443–458).  Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, H., Schnalke, T., & Winkelmann, A. (2013). Sammeln, Erforschen, Zurückgeben? Menschliche Gebeine aus der Kolonialzeit in akademischen und musealen Sammlungen.  Berlin: Christoph Links Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, H., Schnalke, T., & Winkelmann A. (2014). Rückgabe von Schädeln und Skeletten an Namibia: Überreste einer fragwürdigen “Rasseforschung”. Deutsch Ärzteblatt, 111(18), A-792/B-680/C-646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, P. (2002). Indigenous Australian people, their defence of the dead and native title.  In C. Fforde, J. Hubert & P. Turnbull (Eds.), The dead and their possessions: Repatriation in principle, policy and pratice one world archaeology (pp. 63–86). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, P., & Ffforde, C. (2013). Ancestral remains returned from the Natural History Museum, Vienna in 2009 and currently in the care of KALACC, Kimberley region’s peak Indigenous law and culture centre. Unpublished consultancy report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindling, P. (2012). Cleansing anatomical collections: The politics of removing specimens from german anatomical and medical collections 1988–92.  Annals of Anatomy Anatomischer Anzeiger, 149(3), 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, A. (2014). Charité human remains project. Retrieved March 7, 2017 from https://anatomie.charite.de/geschichte/human_remains_projekt/.

  • Winkelmann, A., & Schagen, U. (2009). Hermann Stieve’s clinical-anatomical research on executed women during the Third Reich. Clinical Anatomy, 22(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20760.

  • Zimmerer, J., Zeller, J., & Neathe, E. (2008). Genocide in German South-West Africa: The colonial war (1904–1908) in Namibia and its aftermath. Pontypool: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Research on which this article draws was made possible by funding from the Australian Research Council through its Linkage Scheme (LP130100131: Return, Reconcile, Renew: Understanding the History, Effects and Opportunities of Repatriation).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Turnbull .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Turnbull, P. (2018). German-Australian Research on a Difficult Legacy: Colonial Collections of Indigenous Human Remains in German Museums and Collections. In: Nickl, B., Herrschner, I., Goździak, E. (eds) German-Australian Encounters and Cultural Transfers. Global Germany in Transnational Dialogues. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6599-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6599-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6598-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6599-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics