Skip to main content

Comparison of Measured and Predicted HF Operating Frequencies During Low Solar Activity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

There is a need to find reliable and accurate HF operating frequencies because of the uncertainty and variability of the ionospheric region. Therefore, the aim of this study was to observe and analyze the HF operating frequencies in Peninsular Malaysia. Comparison of HF operating frequency performances was undertaken using ASAPS and ICEPAC prediction software. This study was carried out in Peninsular Malaysia, located in the equatorial region, and at the beginning of solar cycle 24, namely from April to December of 2009. The HF operating frequencies included the maximum usable frequency (MUF) and the operating working frequency (OWF), and were based on hourly monthly median values. Results of the comparison carried out show that MUF and OWF of ASAPS slightly overestimated measurement of MUF and OWF by about 11 and 12% respectively. In contrast, MUF ICEPAC highly underestimated MUF measurement by about 39%. However, OWF ICEPAC slightly overestimated MUF measurement by about 16%. This indicates that the MUF and OWF measurements of HF operating frequencies in the Malaysian region are aligned with the MUF and OWF from the prediction software, particularly the OWF. This study also confirms that HF operating frequencies can be predicted. This study can be used to provide data and assist HF researchers in modeling MUF models for predicting HF operating frequencies in the Malaysian region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Harris R (2005) Radio communications in the digital age, vol 1. Harris Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  2. Canestorp D (2006) Sky satellites : the marine corps’ solution to its over-the-horizon communication problem

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zain AFM, Abdullah M (2000) Death of HF radio communication: fact or myth?. In: Paper presented in international wireless and telecommunication system, pp 109–112

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley PA, Dudeney JR (1973) A simple model of the vertical distribution of electron concentration in the ionosphere. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 35(12):2131–2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maslin NM (1987) HF communications: a systems approach. Pitman Publishing, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Mudzingwa C, Nechibvute A, Chawanda A et al (2013) Maximum useable frequency prediction using vertical incidence data. Int J Eng Res Technol 2(8):2050–2056

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman RL (2006) Radio system design for telecommunication (3rd Ed 98). Wiley-Interscience publication, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanbaba R (1998) Performance prediction methods of HF radio systems. Ann Geophys 41(5–6):715–742

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stocker AJ, Warrington E, Siddle DR (2007) A comparison between the measured and predicted parameters of HF radio signals propagating along the midlatitude trough and within the polar cap. Radio Sci 42:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lakshmi DR (1994) Tropical ionosphere and radio communications. Proc Indian Nat Sci Acad Part A 60:243–262

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larson K (2008) Maximum usable angle. Conejo Valley Amateur Radio Club. Available online: http://www.cvarc.org/tech/maxusableangle.html. Accessed: 11 Feb 2010

  12. Tarplee MC (2008) HF radio wave propagation. ARRL South Carolina Section. Available online: http://www.arrl-sc.org/. Accessed: 11 Feb 2010

  13. LiPing Z, YongGui L (2010) Modeling and simulation of useable frequencies in the ionosphere on HF sky-wave band. In: Presented in information engineering and electronic commerce (IEEC), 2010 2nd International Symposium 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jha KK (2003) Skip zone free HF propagation study for tactical application.In: Presented in 8th international conference on electromagnetic interference and compatibility, pp 229–231

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reilly MH and Daehler M (1986) Sounder updates for statistical model predictions of maximum usable frequencies on HF sky wave paths. Radio [16]; D. Bilitza et al. (2014) The international reference ionosphere 2012—a model of international collaboration. J Sp Weather Sp Clim 4, A07

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wichaipanich N, Supnithi P, Tsugawa T et al (2012) Comparison of ionosphere characteristic parameters obtained by ionosonde with IRI-2007 model over Southeast Asia. Adv Sp Res 52(10):1748–1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Blagoveshchensky DV, Maltseva OA, Anishin MM et al (2016) Modeling of HF propagation at high latitudes on the basis of IRI. Adv Sp Res 57(3):821–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malik RA, Abdullah M, Abdullah S et al (2016) Comparison of maximum usable frequency (MUF) variability over Peninsular Malaysia with IRI model during the rise of solar cycle 24. J Atmos Solar-Terres Phys 138–139:87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luxorion (1998) Review of HF propagation analysis and prediction programs. Available online: http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/qsl-review-propagation-software-nonvoacap.htm

  20. Athieno R, Jayachandran PT, Themens DR et al (2015) Comparison of observed and predicted MUF(3000)F2 in the polar cap region. Radio Sci 50(6):509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Earle GD, Desourdis Jr RI (1994) Advanced modeling of HF radio propagation. In: Presented in military communications conference, 1994, MILCOM’94. Conference Record, IEEE, pp 895–899

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tanyer SG, Erol CB (1998) Broadcast analysis and prediction in the HF band. IEEE Trans Broadcast 44(2):226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu JH, An JP (2209) Modeling and simulation of HF band transmission loss over china oceans. In: Presented in image and signal processing, CISP’09. 2nd International Congress, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lu J, Liu H (2009) Modeling and simulations of high frequency propagation over China sea-surface. In: Presented in information science and engineering (ICISE), 2009 1st International Conference, pp 2653–2657

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li W, Su D, Wang J et al (2013) Prediction of short-wave communication effects based on ICEPAC model. In: Proceedings of 2013 2nd international conference on intelligent system appl mater, pp 295–298

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zolesi B, Fontanaa G, Perronea L et al (2008) A new campaign for oblique-incidence ionospheric sounding over Europe and its data application. J Atmos Sol Terres Phys 70(6):854–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zolesi B, Cander LR (2014) Ionospheric prediction and forecasting. Springer Geophysics

    Google Scholar 

  28. Malik RA, Khamis K, Zakariya AS et al (2010) Determination of maximum usable frequency (MUF) for high frequency (HF) communications. Def Sci Technol Tech Bull 3(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  29. Komitov B, Kaftan V (2013) The sunspot cycle no. 24 in relation to long term solar activity variation. J Adv Res 4(3):279–282

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hao YQ, Shi H, Xiao Z et al (2014) Weak ionization of the global ionosphere in solar cycle 24. Ann Geophys 32(7):809–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kilpua EKJ, Luhmann JG, Jian LK et al (2014) Why have geomagnetic storms been so weak during the recent solar minimum and the rising phase of cycle 24? J Atmos Solar-Terres Phys 107:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2005) Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res 30(1):79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Communication Branch, Instrumentation & Electronics Technology Division, Science & Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE), Ministry of Defence, Malaysia for providing the experimental data. Gratitude is also extended to ANGKASA for supporting the research under the FRGS/1/2016/TK04/UKM/02/4 Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafidah Abd Malik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malik, R.A., Abdullah, M., Abdullah, S., Homam, M.J. (2018). Comparison of Measured and Predicted HF Operating Frequencies During Low Solar Activity. In: Suparta, W., Abdullah, M., Ismail, M. (eds) Space Science and Communication for Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6574-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6574-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6573-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6574-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics