Abstract
This chapter engages with the research program outlined by Scott Eacott in Educational leadership relationally. I aim to mobilize some of the themes explored in the book to analyze a contemporary phenomenon in the administration of education: the enactment of standards for leadership practice. I situate my analysis in the Canadian context, in particular, the province of Ontario. This analytical engagement has two purposes: first, to investigate the possibilities that a relational approach has to offer to the study of the enactment of leadership standards and second, to interrogate some of the assumptions and implications of the relational project for the study of educational administration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alberta Education. (2009). Principal quality practice guideline. Edmonton: Alberta Education.
Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). The great disappearing act: difficulties in doing “leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 359–381.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
BCPVA. (2007). Leadership standards for principals and vice principals in British Columbia. Vancouver: BCPVA.
BCPVA. (2013). Leadership standards for principals and vice principals in British Columbia. Vancouver: BCPVA.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Braun, A., Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596.
CEPPE., & OECD. (2013). Learning standards, teaching standards, standards for school principals. Paris: OECD.
DfES. (2004). National standards for headteachers. Nottingham: DfES.
DfES. (2015). National standards of excellence for headteachers. Nottingham: DfES.
Deleuze, G. (1993). Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Donmoyer, R. (2001). Evers and Lakomski’s search for leadership’s holy grail (and the intriguing ideas they encountered along the way). Journal of Educational Administration, 39(6), 554–572.
Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Education Services Australia. (2011). Australian professional standards for principals. Victoria: ESA.
Education Services Australia. (2015). Australian professional standard for principals and the leadership profiles. Victoria: ESA.
English, F. W. (2012). Bourdieu’s misrecognition: Why educational leadership standards will not reform schools or leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 44(2), 155–170.
Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (1991). Knowing educational administration: Contemporary methodological controversies in educational administration research. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (1996). Exploring educational administration: Coherentist applications and critical debates. New York: Pergamon.
Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (2000). Doing educational administration: A theory of administrative practice. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Foucault, M. (1971). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
Glatter, R. (2006). Leadership and organization in education: time for a re-orientation? School Leadership & Management, 26(1), 69–83.
Greenfield, T. B. (1991). Re-forming and re-valuing educational administration: Whence and when cometh the phoenix? Educational Management & Administration, 19(4), 200–217.
Gunter, H. M. (2005). Conceptualizing research in educational leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 165–180.
Hall, D. (2013). Drawing a veil over managerialism: Leadership and the discursive disguise of the New Public Management. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(3), 267–282.
Heck, R., & Hallinger, P. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today? Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 33(2), 229–244.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York, NY: Harper.
Ingvarson, L., Anderson, M., Gronn, P., & Jackson, A. (2006). Standards for school leadership. Acton: ACER.
Institute for Education Leadership. (2007). The Ontario leadership framework. Toronto: TIEL.
Institute for Education Leadership. (2013). The Ontario leadership framework. Toronto: TIEL.
Lakomski, G. (2005). Managing without leadership: Towards a theory of organizational functioning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New scalar politics: Implications for education policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 489–502.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders (formerly known as ISSLC standards). Reston, VA: NPBEA.
Newton, P., & Riveros, A. (2015). Toward an ontology of practices in educational administration. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 330–341.
Oplatka, I. (2009). The field of educational administration: A historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognize epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from the 1960s onwards. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 8–35.
Oplatka, I. (2010). The legacy of educational administration: A historical analysis of an academic field. Hamburg, Germany: Peter Lang Publisher.
Riveros, A., Newton, P., & Burgess, D. (2017). Leadership standards and the discursive repositioning of leadership, leaders, and non-leaders: A critical examination. In: G. Lakomski, S. Eacott, and C.W. Evers (Eds.), Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organizations (pp. 151–163). London: Routledge.
Riveros, A., Verret, C., & Wei, W. (2016). The translation of leadership standards into leadership practices: A qualitative analysis of the adoption of the Ontario Leadership Framework in urban schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(5), 593–608.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riveros, A. (2018). Thinking Relationally About the “School Leader”. In: Beyond Leadership. Educational Leadership Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6568-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6568-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6567-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6568-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)