Abstract
In order to identify the structural source of contemporary Thailand’s statecraft , this chapter mainly accounts for the accomplishments for which King Bhumibol Adulyadej managed to establish himself as the de facto sovereign of Thailand . In the first place, it will account for how King Bhumibol consolidated and uplifted the royal power over the military power during and after the Cold War period. It will argue for the ways how King Bhumibol went with the larger but contradictory flows of China-backed communist insurgency and US-backed counter-insurgency, which he gradually absorbed the military and uplifted the royal power. Secondly, through examining the historical formation of the Thai rice political economy, it will argue that developing the national rice economy was a major achievement of King Bhumibol to establish his royal sovereignty especially among the rural majority. Nevertheless, this royal sovereignty has been structured following the historical orbits of the ‘sakdina’ (Thai: meaning ‘power over the land’) order. Thirdly, it will examine the rise of the Shinawatra group as a locally hailed populist force in north and north-eastern Thailand. It will argue that the rise of the post-1990 democratic populism had undermined the monarch-centric ‘sakdina’ structured order. The populist rice policies of the former Prime Ministers Thaksin Shinawatra and Yingluck Shinawatra also posed a significant challenge to the conservative elite of the monarchy, the military and the judiciary. Finally, by asking how to plot bloodless coup in Thailand, it will argue that such technique is essential for the conservative elite to chaperone the populist democracy and defend the ‘sakdina’ order as the most resilient habitus in Thailand.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Sources: (1) ‘Thailand’s King Bhumibol Adulyadej Dies, Ending Reign of World’s Longest Serving Monarch’. The Telegraph. 14 October 2016. (2) ‘Thailand’s King Bhumibol Adulyadej Dead at 88’. BBC News. 13 October 2016. (3) ‘What will King Bhumibol’s Death Mean for Thailand?’ Reuters. 13 October 2016. (4) ‘Thailand’s King Bhumibol Takes Final Journey Past Grieving Subjects’. Reuters. 14 October 2016. (5) ‘Thai King Bhumibol Adulyadej Dies after 70-year Reign’. The Guardian. 13 October 2016. (6) ‘King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand Dies Aged 88’. Financial Times. 13 October 2016.
- 2.
Source: ‘泰國王儲延遲一年登基, 普密蓬親信、樞密院院長任攝政王’ 端傳媒. 17 October 2016.
- 3.
Sources: (1) ‘Voters in Thailand Endorse Military’s Proposed Constitution’. The New York Times. 7 August 2016. (2) ‘Thai Referendum: Military-Written Constitution Approved’. BBC News. 7 August 2016. (3) ‘Thailand Referendum: New Constitution Wins Approval’. Al Jazeera. 7 August 2016. (4) ‘泰國新憲法公投日, 沉默大眾能否叫停軍方主政?’ 端傳媒 7 August 2016. (5) ‘泰國新憲法公投開票8成62%民眾支持’ 自由時報. 7 August 2016.
- 4.
‘Thai “Roadmap” to Democratic Rule Unchanged by King’s Death: PM’. Reuters. 18 October 2016.
- 5.
Sources: (1) ‘How King Bhumibol Shaped Modern Thailand’. BBC News. 13 October 2016. (2) ‘Obituary: King Bhumibol of Thailand’. BBC News. 13 October 2016.
- 6.
Source: ‘Obituary: King Bhumibol of Thailand’. BBC News. 13 October 2016.
- 7.
Sources: (1) ‘How King Bhumibol Shaped Modern Thailand’. BBC News. 13 October 2016. (2) ‘Obituary: King Bhumibol of Thailand’. BBC News. 13 October 2016.
- 8.
Source: ‘Profile: Thai Regent Prem Tinsulanonda’. BBC News. 15 October 2016.
- 9.
Source: ‘Obituary: King Bhumibol of Thailand’. BBC News. 13 October 2016.
- 10.
Source: ‘Obituary: King Bhumibol of Thailand’. BBC News. 13 October 2016.
- 11.
Sources: (1) ‘Thailand Votes for a New Constitution’. The Economist. 8 August 2016. (2) Patrick Jory (2016). ‘The Real Meaning of Thailand’s Constitutional Referendum’. Asian Currents (Asian Studies Association of Australia; http://asaa.asn.au). 16 August 2016.
- 12.
Source: ‘King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand, 1927–2016’. Financial Times. 13 October 2016.
- 13.
Source: ‘泰國憲法公投過關, 走向隱性軍政府’ 端傳媒. 9 August 2016.
- 14.
Sources: (1) ‘Thai Referendum: Why Thais Backed a Military-backed Constitution’. BBC News. 9 August 2016. (2) ‘Thai Junta Passes Ballot Box Test with Referendum Win’. Reuters. 8 August 2016. (3) ‘Thailand Votes in Favour of Military Backed Constitution’. Financial Times. 7 August 2016. (4) Mong Palatino (2016). ‘Thailand’s New Constitution: A Blow to Rights?’ The Diplomat. 17 August 2016.
- 15.
Sources: (1) ‘Political Implications of the Draft Constitution of Thailand: A Conversation with Prof Tom Ginsburg and Mr Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang’. International Idea (www.idea.int). 28 July 2016. (2) ‘政變兩年後泰國舉行新憲法公投’ BBC News. 7 August 2016.
- 16.
Since 2009, I have served as a visiting researcher at the Institute of Thai Studies of Chulalongkorn University. Over the years, I thank its director Arjahn Suchitra Chongstitvatana for having engaging dialogues with me (Wong & Chongstitvatana, 2014a, b ‘thick dark democracy’). I also wish to acknowledge the Dean of Faculty of Fine and Applied Arts of Chulalongkorn University, Arjahn Suppakorn Disatapundhu for generously sharing his insights.
- 17.
State Irrigation Act (B.E. 2485 [1946]). English source: Thailand Law Forum (www.thailandlawforum.com). Date of document: 1 February 2010.
- 18.
Section 17, Chapter III, State Irrigation Act (B.E. 2485 [1946]). English source: Thailand Law Forum (www.thailandlawforum.com). Date of document: 1 February 2010.
- 19.
Kamnang Song’s original Thai and Chinese names are ‘Song Ongchaiwatana’ and ‘翁樹松’, respectively. Sources: (1) Individual interview with Kamnang Song in his residence in Bangkok, Thailand. 12 May 2012.
- 20.
Source: (1) Individual interview with Kamnang Song in his residence in Bangkok, Thailand. 13 May 2012. (2) Nadon, Somwong (1987). ‘Kamnang Song Aungchaiwattana’ (In Thai language). Business Leader (ผู้นำธุรกิจ). Volume 1.7.
References
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Akira, S. (1989). Capital accumulation in Thailand, 1855-1985. Tokyo: The Centre for East Asian Cultural Studies.
Auansakul, P. (1994). Chinese rice traders in Thailand. In H.-D. Evers & H. Schrader (Eds.), The moral economy of trade: Ethnicity and developing markets. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brown, I. (1988). The elite and the economy in Siam c. 1890-1920. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
Brueggemann, W. (1978). The prophetic imagination. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress Press.
Chantavanich, S. (1997). From Siamese-Chinese to Chinese-Thai: Political conditions and identity shifts among the Chinese in Thailand. In L. Suryadinata (Ed.), Ethnic Chinese as Southeast Asians. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Chen, P.-H. (2009). Soldiers and politics: Coups d’Etat and political changes in Thailand (In Chinese). Taipei: Center for Asia-Pacific Studies, Academia Sinica.
Crispin, S. W. (2016, 8 August 2016). What does Thailand’s referendum result mean? The Diplomat.
Dawe, D. C., Moya, P. F., Casiwan, C. B., & Cabling, J. M. (2008). Rice marketing systems in the Philippines and Thailand: Do large numbers of competitive traders ensure good performance? Food Policy, 33, 455–463.
Decalo, S. (1976). Coups and army rule in Africa: Studies in military style. Hew Haven: Yale University Press.
Ganjanapan, A. (1984). The partial commercialization of rice production in Northern Thailand (1900-1981). Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Ginsburg, T. (2009). Constitutional afterlife: The continuing impact of Thailand’s postpolitical constitution. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7(1), 83–105.
Gomez, E. T. (2000). In search of patrons: Chinese business networking and Malay political patronage in Malaysia. In K. B. Chan (Ed.), Chinese business networks: State, economy and culture. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Gomez, E. T. (Ed.). (2002). Political business in East Asia. London: Routledge.
Hamilton, G. G., & Waters, T. (2006). Ethnicity and capitalist development: The changing role of the Chinese in Thailand. In G. G. Hamilton (Ed.), Commerce and capitalism in Chinese Societies. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Harding, A. (2007). Buddhism, human rights and constitutional reform in Thailand. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 2(1), 0–25.
Hewison, K. (1988). The structure of banking capital in Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 16(1), 81–91.
Hewison, K. (1989). Bankers and bureaucrats: Capital and the role of the state in Thailand. New Haven: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies.
Hutchcroft, P. (2000). Obstructive corruption: The politics of privilege in the Philippines. In M. H. Khan & K. S. Jomo (Eds.), Rents, rent-seeking and economic development: Theory and evidence in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ishii, Y. (Ed.). (1978). Thailand: A rice-growing society. Translated by Peter and Stephanie Hawkes. Honolulu & Kyoto: The University Press of Hawaii & the Center for Southeast Asian Studies of Kyoto University.
Jansen, R. S. (2011). Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory, 29(2), 75–96.
Johnston, D. B. (1975). Rural society and the rice economy in Thailand, 1880-1930. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven.
Kieh, G. K. J., & Agbese, P. O. (Eds.). (2004). The military and politics in Africa: From engagement to democratic and constitutional control. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kruavan, J. (1986). The effects of the free rice trade policy in Thailand. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Landsdale, E. G. (1972). In the midst of wars: An America’s mission to Southeast Asia. New York: Fordham University Press.
Lefebvre, G. (2001). The French revolution: From its origins to 1793. London: Routledge.
Li, Z. (2013). 圖解一次完全讀懂厚黑學 [Thick Dark Study—Pictorially Illustrated and Easily Understood] (In Chinese). Taipei: 海鴿文化出版圖書有限公司.
Manarungsan, S. (1989). Economic development of Thailand, 1850-1950. Bangkok: Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University.
McVey, R. (Ed.). (2000). Money and power in provincial Thailand. Singapore and Chiang Mai (Thailand): Institute of Southeast Asian Studies and Silkworm Books.
Merieau, E. (2016). Thailand’s deep state, royal power and the constitutional court (1997-2015). Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 445–466.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Onwudiwe, E. (2004). Military coups in Africa: A framework for research. In P. O. Agbese & G. K. J. Kieh (Eds.), The military and politics in Africa: From engagement to democratic and constitutional control (pp. 17–35). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Rattansakawong, K. (1995). San Rattanthamanoon Lae Withi Picharana Kadi Rattathamoon [The Constitutional Court and Constitutional Court Procedures]. Bangkok: Research Support Fund.
Saiyud, K. (1986). The struggle for Thailand: Counter-insurgency, 1965-1985. Bangkok: S. Research Center Co.
Schmitt, C. (1921). Die Diktatur. Munich-Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Schmitt, C. (1988[1923]). The crisis of parliamentary democracy (E. Kennedy, Trans.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Schmitt, C. (2004[1934]). On the three types of juristic thought (J. W. Bendersky, Trans.). Westport, Connecticut & London: Praeger.
Schmitt, C. (2005[1922]). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty (G. Schwab, Trans.). London: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Schmitt, C. (2008[1928]). Constitutional theory (Verfassung-slehre) (J. Seitzer, Trans.). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Sidel, J. T. (2004). Bossism and democracy in the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia: Towards an alternative framework for the study of ‘local strongmen’. In J. Harriss, K. Stokke, & O. Tornquist (Eds.), Politicising democracy: The new local politics of democratisation (pp. 51–74). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Skinner, G. W. (1957). Chinese society in Thailand: An analytical history. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Tan, C. B. (Ed.). (2007). Chinese transnational networks. London and New York: Routledge.
Tocqueville, A. (2010). The old regime and the French revolution. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.
Vanichjakvong, P. (2002). The rice economy of Thailand: supply, demand and price. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illionis at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign.
Wong, P. N. (2009). In search of the state-in-society: Re-conceiving Philippine political development, 1946-2002. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG.
Wong, P. N. (2010, December 20). 潮商掌泰米業,族群壟斷非洪水猛獸 [Teochiu Merchants Control Thai Rice Business, Ethnic Monopoly Is Not Necessary a Social Evil] (In Chinese). Hong Kong Economic Journal (信報).
Wong, P. N. (2011a). Following the grain: State formation and trans-local grain-trading networks in the Philippines. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(4), 584–609.
Wong, P. N. (2011b, October 28). 英祿治水, 危中尋機 [P.M. Yingluck Tames Floods, Finding Opportunities in Crisis] (In Chinese). Hong Kong Economic Journal (信報), A26.
Wong, P. N. (2012). 泰國米業的歷史與變遷 - 專訪香港城市大學黃伯農博士 [History and Changes in the Thai Rice Industry—An Exclusive Interview with Dr. Wong Pak Nung of City University of Hong Kong.] 南寧職業技術學院學報 Journal of Nanning Polytechnic, 17(5), i–iv.
Wong, P. N. (2013a). Post-colonial statecraft in South East Asia: Sovereignty, state building and the Chinese in the Philippines. London and New York: I. B. Tauris.
Wong, P. N. (2013b, December 11). 以所羅門治國之道探析泰國政局 [Analysing Thai Politics Through King Solomon’s Statecraft] (In Chinese). Hong Kong Economic Journal (信報), A24.
Wong, P. N. (2014a, February 8–9). 看泰國政局思考提升民主質素 [Reflecting on How to Improve Democratic Quality Through the Lens of Thai Politics] (In Chinese). Hong Kong Economic Journal [信報].
Wong, P. N. (2014b, May 31–June 2). 看泰國政變勾勒民主政改方案 [Outline Democratic Reform Proposal After the 2014 Thai Coup]. Hong Kong Economic Journal (信報), A17.
Wong, P. N. (2014c, February 10). 提升亞洲民主須規限「權力資本」 [Uplifting Asian Democracy Requires Regulating ‘Power Capital’] (In Chinese). Hong Kong Economic Journal [信報].
Wong, P. N. (2016a). Discerning the powers in post-colonial Africa and Asia: A treatise on Christian statecraft. Heidelberg & Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media.
Wong, P. N. (2016b, October 25). 後普密蓬時代泰國政治發展 [Thai Political Development in the Post-Bhumibol Era] (In Chinese). Ming Pao (明報).
Wong, P. N., & Chongstitvatana, S. (2014a). Containing and dissolving ontological violence: A Christian-Buddhist joint reflection for attaining de-colonial epistemic freedom in Asia. The Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 13(2), 290–315.
Wong, P. N., & Chongstitvatana, S. (2014b, January 18/19). 泰國走向「厚黑」民主化 [Thailand Moves Towards ‘Thick Dark’ Democracy] (In Chinese). Hong Kong Economic Journal (信報), A15.
Wong, P. N., Chongstitvatana, S., & Yue, W. K. R. (2012, December 14). 從泰國政局看中國如何調整對東盟米糧策略 [How Could China Adjust its ASEAN Rice Strategy? Some Lessons from Thailand] (In Chinese). Hong Kong Economic Journal (信報), A26.
Wongtada, N. (1986). Structure of power and dependency: A case study of Sino-Thai business community in Thailand. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Xu, M. (2007). 東南亞華人與僑批 [The Money Remittance Mail and Overseas Chinese in S. E. Asia] (In Chinese). Bangkok: 泰國泰華進出口商會出版.
Yano, T. (1978). Political structure of a “rice-growing state”. In Y. Ishii (Ed.), Thailand: A rice-growing society. Translated by Peter and Stephanie Hawkes. Honolulu & Kyoto: The University Press of Hawaii & The Center for Southeast Asian Studies of Kyoto University.
Yoshihara, K. (1994). The nation and economic growth: The Philippines and Thailand. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
Zheng, H., & Wong, S.-l. (2005). The rice trade history of Hong Kong 香港米業史 (In Chinese). Hong Kong: Joint Publishing (H.K.) Co., Ltd.
Zheng, V., & Wong, S.-L. (2009). Rice is power: Inter-ethnic business competition in post-war Hong Kong. Berliner China-Hefte/Chinese History and Society, 35, 80–97.
Zheng, W. T. V., & Wong, S.-l. (2010). A thought on a Hong Kong Chaozhou rice merchant’s Thai rice network (In Chinese). Asia-Pacific Forum, 47(March 2010), 87–105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wong, P. (2018). Chaperoning Thai Populist Democracy: Habitus, Structure and Technique of King Bhumibol Adulyadej’s Statecraft (1946–2016). In: Destined Statecraft. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6563-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6563-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6561-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6563-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)