Skip to main content

Optimal Design of Experimental Platform for Electronic-Hydraulic Driving Vehicle Based on the Multi-factor Synthetic Evaluation Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Mechanical Design (ICMD 2017)

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 55))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Electronic-hydraulic driving vehicle has the advantages of high energy-utilization efficiency, excellent driving power, fine cross-country performance, and outstanding controllability, which make it a research focus in the field of novel transmission technique. Experimental platform is an important and essential instrument for the research and development of electronic-hydraulic driving vehicle, and its optimal design was conducted based on the multi-factor synthetic evaluation model. Three electronic-hydraulic driving modes were investigated in this study, which included the series type, the parallel type, and the mixed type. The investigated parameters in the multi-factor synthetic evaluation model consisted of volume, mass, system noise, requirement of spatial layout, difficulty in structure array, transformation cost of present car, transmission of gear-box, infinitely variable speed, mechanical transmission mode, difficulty in control, controllability of the driving system, total efficiency of the transmission system, energy integrated management strategy, loss of system energy, energy recovery efficiency, dynamic performance, security, reliability, probability, applicability, and so on. The weight and score of each parameter in the multi-factor synthetic evaluation model had been obtained by the expert scoring system. In order to satisfy the special demand of the military vehicle, it could be found that the series electronic-hydraulic driving mode was the optimal option, which could be judged from the final scores of the three modes according to the multi-factor synthetic evaluation model. Design and construction of the experimental platform would be propitious to advance the further research of the electronic-hydraulic driving vehicle and promote its application in the field of novel transmission vehicle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Xia L, Jiang HB. An electronically controlled hydraulic power steering system for heavy vehicles. Adv Mech Eng. 2016;8(11):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Soriano F, Moreno-Eguilaz M, Alvarez J, et al. Topological analysis of powertrains for refuse-collecting vehicles based on real routes–Part I: hybrid hydraulic powertrain. Int J Automot Technol. 2016;17(5):873–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meng F, Shi P, Karimi HR, et al. Optimal design of an electro-hydraulic valve for heavy-duty vehicle clutch actuator with certain constraint. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2016;68–69:491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang J, Yu L, Ding L. Velocity feedback control of swing phase for 2-DoF robotic leg driven by electro-hydraulic servo system. Eng Lett. 2016;24(4):378–83.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castillo JJ, Cabrera JA, Guerra AJ, et al. A novel electro-hydraulic brake system with tire-road friction estimation and continuous brake pressure control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2016;63(3):1863–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao YN, Chen JB. Electric hydraulic accelerator control device in AMT. Procedia Eng. 2011;23:125–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun Z, Kuo TW. Transient control of electro-hydraulic fully flexible engine valve actuation system. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2010;18(3):613–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Minav TA, Pyrhonen JJ, Laurila LIE., Permanent magnet synchronous machine sizing: effect on the energy efficiency of an electro-hydraulic Forklift. IEEE Trans Industr Electron. 2012;59(6):2466–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keller J. DARPA to develop swarming unmanned vehicles for better military reconnaissance. Mil Aerosp Electron. 2017;28(2):4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clemente C, Pallotta L, Gaglione D, et al. Automatic target recognition of military vehicles with Krawtchouk Moments. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2017;99:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schihl P, Hoogterp-Decker L, Gingrich E. The ignition behavior of a coal to liquid Fischer-Tropsch jet fuel in a military relevant single cylinder diesel engine. SAE Int J Fuels Lubricants. 2012;5(2):785–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maldonado MA, Shah NM, Cleek KJ, et al. Power management and distribution system for a more electric aircraft (MADMEL). IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine. 1999;14(12):3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frank M. International SmarTruck III. Motor Trend. 2004;56(6):46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dan M. Army Meets 007. Popular Sci. 2001;256(6):58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michelle D. SmarTruck: V-6 efficiency, V-8 performance. Automot News. 2004;78(6084):32I.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brain V. King of trucks. Motor Trend. 2004;56(8):138.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davood K, Danny M. Torque feedback on the steering wheel of agricultural vehicles. Comput Electron Agric. 2009;65(1):77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dou CX, Yue D, Li XB, et al. MAS based management and control strategies for integrated hybrid energy system. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2016;12(4):1332–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandoval C, Alvarado VM, Carmona JC, et al. Energy management control strategy to improve the FC/SC dynamic behavior on hybrid electric vehicles: a frequency based distribution. Renew Energy. 2017;105:407–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oo AMT, Rahman MS. Distributed multi-agent based coordinated power management and control strategy for microgrids with distributed energy resources. Energy Convers Manag. 2017;139:20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deetz M, Poddig T, Sidorovitch I, et al. An evaluation of conditional multi-factor models in active asset allocation strategies: an empirical study for the German stock market. Fin Markets Portfolio Mgmt. 2009;23(3):285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fouque JP, Han CH. Variance reduction for Monte Carlo methods to evaluate option prices under multi-factor stochastic volatility models. Quant Finance. 2004;4(5):597–606.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Loewenstein DA, Ownby R, Schram L, et al. An evaluation of the NINCDS-ADRDA neuropsychological criteria for the assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease: a confirmatory factor analysis of single versus multi-factor models. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23(3):274–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meng F, Tao G, Zhang T, et al. Optimal shifting control strategy in inertia phase of an automatic transmission for automotive applications. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2015;60–61:742–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Holm H, Afridi KK. An expert-based investigation of the common vulnerability scoring system. Comput Secur. 2015;53:18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zagonari F, Rossi C. A heterogeneous multi-criteria multi-expert decision-support system for scoring combinations of flood mitigation and recovery options. Environ Model Softw. 2013;49:152–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Braun HI, Bennett RE, Frye D, et al. Scoring constructed responses using expert systems. J Educ Meas. 1990;27(2):93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51505498), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20150714), and National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0802903).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinmin Shen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, C. et al. (2018). Optimal Design of Experimental Platform for Electronic-Hydraulic Driving Vehicle Based on the Multi-factor Synthetic Evaluation Model. In: Tan, J., Gao, F., Xiang, C. (eds) Advances in Mechanical Design. ICMD 2017. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 55. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6553-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6553-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6552-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6553-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics