Abstract
Electronic-hydraulic driving vehicle has the advantages of high energy-utilization efficiency, excellent driving power, fine cross-country performance, and outstanding controllability, which make it a research focus in the field of novel transmission technique. Experimental platform is an important and essential instrument for the research and development of electronic-hydraulic driving vehicle, and its optimal design was conducted based on the multi-factor synthetic evaluation model. Three electronic-hydraulic driving modes were investigated in this study, which included the series type, the parallel type, and the mixed type. The investigated parameters in the multi-factor synthetic evaluation model consisted of volume, mass, system noise, requirement of spatial layout, difficulty in structure array, transformation cost of present car, transmission of gear-box, infinitely variable speed, mechanical transmission mode, difficulty in control, controllability of the driving system, total efficiency of the transmission system, energy integrated management strategy, loss of system energy, energy recovery efficiency, dynamic performance, security, reliability, probability, applicability, and so on. The weight and score of each parameter in the multi-factor synthetic evaluation model had been obtained by the expert scoring system. In order to satisfy the special demand of the military vehicle, it could be found that the series electronic-hydraulic driving mode was the optimal option, which could be judged from the final scores of the three modes according to the multi-factor synthetic evaluation model. Design and construction of the experimental platform would be propitious to advance the further research of the electronic-hydraulic driving vehicle and promote its application in the field of novel transmission vehicle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Xia L, Jiang HB. An electronically controlled hydraulic power steering system for heavy vehicles. Adv Mech Eng. 2016;8(11):1–11.
Soriano F, Moreno-Eguilaz M, Alvarez J, et al. Topological analysis of powertrains for refuse-collecting vehicles based on real routes–Part I: hybrid hydraulic powertrain. Int J Automot Technol. 2016;17(5):873–82.
Meng F, Shi P, Karimi HR, et al. Optimal design of an electro-hydraulic valve for heavy-duty vehicle clutch actuator with certain constraint. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2016;68–69:491–503.
Zhang J, Yu L, Ding L. Velocity feedback control of swing phase for 2-DoF robotic leg driven by electro-hydraulic servo system. Eng Lett. 2016;24(4):378–83.
Castillo JJ, Cabrera JA, Guerra AJ, et al. A novel electro-hydraulic brake system with tire-road friction estimation and continuous brake pressure control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2016;63(3):1863–75.
Zhao YN, Chen JB. Electric hydraulic accelerator control device in AMT. Procedia Eng. 2011;23:125–30.
Sun Z, Kuo TW. Transient control of electro-hydraulic fully flexible engine valve actuation system. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2010;18(3):613–21.
Minav TA, Pyrhonen JJ, Laurila LIE., Permanent magnet synchronous machine sizing: effect on the energy efficiency of an electro-hydraulic Forklift. IEEE Trans Industr Electron. 2012;59(6):2466–74.
Keller J. DARPA to develop swarming unmanned vehicles for better military reconnaissance. Mil Aerosp Electron. 2017;28(2):4–6.
Clemente C, Pallotta L, Gaglione D, et al. Automatic target recognition of military vehicles with Krawtchouk Moments. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2017;99:1–8.
Schihl P, Hoogterp-Decker L, Gingrich E. The ignition behavior of a coal to liquid Fischer-Tropsch jet fuel in a military relevant single cylinder diesel engine. SAE Int J Fuels Lubricants. 2012;5(2):785–802.
Maldonado MA, Shah NM, Cleek KJ, et al. Power management and distribution system for a more electric aircraft (MADMEL). IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine. 1999;14(12):3–8.
Frank M. International SmarTruck III. Motor Trend. 2004;56(6):46.
Dan M. Army Meets 007. Popular Sci. 2001;256(6):58.
Michelle D. SmarTruck: V-6 efficiency, V-8 performance. Automot News. 2004;78(6084):32I.
Brain V. King of trucks. Motor Trend. 2004;56(8):138.
Davood K, Danny M. Torque feedback on the steering wheel of agricultural vehicles. Comput Electron Agric. 2009;65(1):77–84.
Dou CX, Yue D, Li XB, et al. MAS based management and control strategies for integrated hybrid energy system. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2016;12(4):1332–49.
Sandoval C, Alvarado VM, Carmona JC, et al. Energy management control strategy to improve the FC/SC dynamic behavior on hybrid electric vehicles: a frequency based distribution. Renew Energy. 2017;105:407–18.
Oo AMT, Rahman MS. Distributed multi-agent based coordinated power management and control strategy for microgrids with distributed energy resources. Energy Convers Manag. 2017;139:20–32.
Deetz M, Poddig T, Sidorovitch I, et al. An evaluation of conditional multi-factor models in active asset allocation strategies: an empirical study for the German stock market. Fin Markets Portfolio Mgmt. 2009;23(3):285–313.
Fouque JP, Han CH. Variance reduction for Monte Carlo methods to evaluate option prices under multi-factor stochastic volatility models. Quant Finance. 2004;4(5):597–606.
Loewenstein DA, Ownby R, Schram L, et al. An evaluation of the NINCDS-ADRDA neuropsychological criteria for the assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease: a confirmatory factor analysis of single versus multi-factor models. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23(3):274–84.
Meng F, Tao G, Zhang T, et al. Optimal shifting control strategy in inertia phase of an automatic transmission for automotive applications. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2015;60–61:742–52.
Holm H, Afridi KK. An expert-based investigation of the common vulnerability scoring system. Comput Secur. 2015;53:18–30.
Zagonari F, Rossi C. A heterogeneous multi-criteria multi-expert decision-support system for scoring combinations of flood mitigation and recovery options. Environ Model Softw. 2013;49:152–65.
Braun HI, Bennett RE, Frye D, et al. Scoring constructed responses using expert systems. J Educ Meas. 1990;27(2):93–108.
Acknowledgements
This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51505498), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20150714), and National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0802903).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, C. et al. (2018). Optimal Design of Experimental Platform for Electronic-Hydraulic Driving Vehicle Based on the Multi-factor Synthetic Evaluation Model. In: Tan, J., Gao, F., Xiang, C. (eds) Advances in Mechanical Design. ICMD 2017. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 55. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6553-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6553-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6552-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6553-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)