Skip to main content

Stability Analysis for a Class of Caputo Fractional Time-Varying Systems with Nonlinear Dynamics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceedings of 2017 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference (CISC 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 459))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates mainly stability problem of equilibrium points for a class of Caputo fractional time-varying systems with nonlinear dynamics. By employing Gronwall-Bellman’s inequality, Laplace transform and estimates of Mittag-Leffler functions, when the fractional-order belongs to the interval (0, 2), several stability criterions for fractional time-varying system described by Caputo’s definition are presented. Besides, some problems about the stability of fractional time-varying systems in existing literatures are pointed out. Finally, an example and corresponding numerical simulations are presented to show the validity and feasibility of the proposed stability criterions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Podlubny I. Fractional differential equations. NewYork: Academic; 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou Y (2014) Basic theory of fractional differential equations, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  3. Matignon D. Stability results for fractional differential equations with applications to control processing. Comput Eng Syst Appl. 1996;2:963–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trigeassou J, Maamri N, Sabatier J, Oustaloup A. A Lyapunov approach to the stability of fractional differential equations. Signal Process. 2011;91(3):437–45.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Chen Y, Pudlubny I. Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional order nonlinear dynamic systems. Automatica. 2009;45(8):1965–9.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen L, Chai Y, Wu R, Yang J. Stability and stabilization of a class of nonlinear fractional-order systems with Caputo derivative. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II, Express Briefs. 2012;59(9):602–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ge F, Kou C. Stability analysis by Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem for nonlinear fractional differential equations. Appl Math Comput. 2015;257:308–16.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Li C, Zhang F. A survey on the stability of fractional differential equations. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2011;193:27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallegos J, Duarte-Mermoud M. Boundedness and convergence on fractional order systems. J Comput Appl Math. 2016;296:815–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang S, Zhang R, Chen D. Stability of nonlinear fractional-order time varying systems. ASME J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2016;11(3):031007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabatier J, Farges C, Oustaloup A. Fractional systems state space description: some wrong ideas and proposed solution. J Vib Control. 2014;20(7):1076–84.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Wen X, Wu Z, Lu J. Stability analysis of a class of nonlinear fractional-order systems. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II, Express Briefs. 2008;55(11):1178–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang R, Tian G, Yang S, Cao H. Stability analysis of a class of fractional order nonlinear systems with order lying in (0, 2). ISA Trans. 2015;56:102–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Diethelm K, Ford NJ, Freed AD. A predictor-corrector approach for the numerical solution of fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Dyn. 2002;29(1–4):3–22.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation (No. 61327807, No. 61573034).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Let us modify the system (12) as the following system, where \(\alpha =0.95\).

$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{aligned}&\frac{d^{\alpha }x_1(t)}{dt^{\alpha }}=-x_{1}(t)+10x_{2}(t)+0.1x_1(t)x_2(t),\\&\frac{d^{\alpha }x_2(t)}{dt^{\alpha }}=(-1+0.9\cos (5t))x_{1}(t)+0.95x_{2}(t), \end{aligned} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(13)

where \(\frac{d^{\alpha }}{dt^{\alpha }}\) stands for Caputo fractional derivative operator, \(x(t)=[x_{1}(t),x_{2}(t)]^T\) is the pseudo-state vector of the system. Subsequently, one gets

By the equations \(\det (\lambda I-\bar{A})=0\) and , one can calculate the corresponding eigenvalues as:

$$\begin{aligned} {\lambda _{1,2}} = \frac{{ - 0.05 \pm 0.89303i}}{2} \; \mathrm {and} \; {\tilde{\lambda } _{1,2}} = \frac{{ - 0.05 \pm 8.49691i}}{2}. \end{aligned}$$

Then, \(|{\arg ({\lambda _i}(\bar{A}))}|=1.6267\) and , which implies that . Consequently, it is easy to calculate that \(\Vert {\bar{A}}\Vert =10.0952\), , , \(\alpha \Vert {\bar{A}}\Vert = 9.5904\), , and \({\mathop {\lim }\limits }_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{{\left\| {f(x(t))} \right\| }}{{\left\| {x(t)} \right\| }} = {\mathop {\lim }\limits }_{x \rightarrow 0} {\frac{0.1\sqrt{{{({x_{1}}{x_{2}})}^{2}}}}{\sqrt{x_{1}^{2} + x_{2}^{2}}}} \le 0.05 {\mathop {\lim }\limits }_{x \rightarrow 0} \sqrt{x_{1}^{2} + x_{2}^{2}} = 0\).

Obviously, the system (13) satisfies the three conditions which are shown in the literature [10]. However, the state of system (13) cannot converge to zero as time t tends to infinity. In the following, Adams-Bashforth-Moulton predictor-corrector algorithm [14] is employed to the numerical calculation of fractional system. When the initial condition \((x_1(0), x_2(0))=(0.1, 0.1)\), the system (13) can generate subharmonic, harmonic or almost-periodic oscillation and even yield a chaotic trajectory. Its chaotic figure is shown in Fig. 3, while Fig. 4 depicts the evolution of the trajectories \(x_1(t)\) and \(x_2(t)\) of system (13). Therefore, the proposed results of paper [10] are not correct. Since the matrix A(t) of system may depend on time t, we cannot select the lower and upper boundaries of the time matrix A(t) to determine the stability of the zero solution of the time-varying system with integer-order or fractional-order differential operator. Meanwhile, the stability criterions of our presented paper is not used to check the convergence and divergence of the system (13) as well; it will be our future topic of research.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Chaotic behavior of system

Fig. 4
figure 4

Evolution of the state \(x_{1}(t)\) and \(x_{2}(t)\) of the system

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guo, Y., Ma, B. (2018). Stability Analysis for a Class of Caputo Fractional Time-Varying Systems with Nonlinear Dynamics. In: Jia, Y., Du, J., Zhang, W. (eds) Proceedings of 2017 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference. CISC 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 459. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6496-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6496-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6495-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6496-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics