Hacking Toys and Remixing Media: Integrating Maker Literacies into Early Childhood Teacher Education

  • Karen E. WohlwendEmail author
  • Jill A. Scott
  • Joanne H. Yi
  • Amanda Deliman
  • Tolga Kargin
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 22)


This study examined a literacy playshop curriculum that integrated maker literacies (i.e., collaborative play, toyhacking, filmmaking, video editing, and remixing media) in two US teacher education classes with approximately 40 university students. Preservice teachers engaged in digital puppetry activities using makerspace tools, iPads, and puppetry apps for young children. The preservice teachers used craft materials to hack or redesign favorite media characters’ action figures to make interactive puppets for original films and for teaching a filmmaking lesson with a young child. Nexus analysis of literacy playshop activity analyzed preservice teachers’ knowledge of seemingly “intuitive” digital literacies as a nexus of practice, or the tacit expectations, social practices, and text conventions in viral videos or computer apps that become engrained through engagements with immersive and embodied technologies. The chapter concludes with a summary of maker literacies and implications for early education gleaned from the complex interactions around teaching and learning through collaborative storytelling with iPad touchscreens.


  1. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Burnett, C. (2010). Technology and literacy in early childhood educational settings: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 247–270. Scholar
  3. Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2013). Learning literacies and new technologies: The current context and future possibilities. In J. Larson & J. Marsh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of early childhood literacy (2nd ed., pp. 575–586). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Dyson, A. H. (2003). The brothers and sisters learn to write: Popular literacies in childhood and school cultures. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fleming, L. (2014, September/October). Literacy in the making: Showing how the “maker movement” has a place in all disciplines. Reading Today, 32, 28–29. Retrieved from'maker-movement'-has-a-place-in-all-disciplines
  6. Flewitt, R., Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N. (2014). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 289–310. Scholar
  7. Grace, D., & Tobin, J. (1998). Butt jokes and mean-teacher parodies: Video production in the elementary classroom. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Teaching popular culture: Beyond radical pedagogy (pp. 42–62). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  8. Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Education Review, 84(4), 495–504. Retrieved from Scholar
  9. Herold, B. (2015, January 2). Finding the right fit for ed tech in the early years. Education Week. Retrieved from
  10. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ito, M. (2007). Technologies of the childhood imagination: Media mixes, hypersociality, and recombinant cultural form. Médiamorphoses, 21. Retrieved from
  12. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading ‘a pedagogy of multiliteracies’: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1).
  14. Marsh, J. (2005). Ritual, performance, and identity construction: Young children's engagement with popular cultural and media texts. In J. Marsh (Ed.), Popular culture, new media and digital literacy in early childhood (pp. 28–50). New York: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marsh, J. (2006). Emergent media literacy: Digital animation in early childhood. Language and Education, 20(6), 493–506. Scholar
  16. Marsh, J. (2010). Young children’s play in online virtual worlds. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(1), 23–39. Scholar
  17. Marsh, J. (2014). Media, popular culture and play. In L. Brooker & M. Blaise (Eds.), Sage handbook of play and learning in early childhood (pp. 403–414). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKay, C., & Peppler, K. A. (2013, June 24). MakerCart: A mobile Fab Lab for the classroom. Paper presented at the Interaction Design and Children (IDC) Conference, New York.
  19. Mills, K. A. (2016). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  20. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 132–141. Scholar
  21. Nixon, H., & Comber, B. (2005). Behind the scenes: Making movies in early years classrooms. In J. Marsh (Ed.), Popular culture, new media and digital literacy in early childhood (pp. 219–236). New York: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22–27. Scholar
  23. Pugh, A. J. (2009). Longing and belonging: Parents, children, and consumer culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rowsell, J., & Pahl, K. (2007). Sedimented identities in texts: Instances of practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(3), 388–404. Scholar
  25. Sargent, J. (2016). Welcome to the post-writing web. Gawker. Retrieved from
  26. Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Sefton-Green, J., Marsh, J., Erstad, O., & Flewitt, R. (2016). Establishing a research agenda for the digital literacy practices of young children: A white paper for COST action IS1410. Retrieved from
  29. Thiel, J. J. (2015). Bumblebee's in trouble: Embodied literacies during imaginative superhero play. Language Arts, 93(1), 38–49. Retrieved from Scholar
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1935/1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wartella, E., Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Robb, M. B. (2013). Technology in the lives of educators and early childhood programs: 2012 survey of early childhood educators. Latrobe: Northwestern University and Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media.Google Scholar
  32. Wohlwend, K. E. (2009). Damsels in discourse: Girls consuming and producing gendered identity texts through Disney Princess play. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 57–83. Scholar
  33. Wohlwend, K. E. (2011). Playing their way into literacies: Reading, writing, and belonging in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wohlwend, K. E. (2012). The boys who would be princesses: Playing with gender identity intertexts in Disney Princess transmedia. Gender and Education, 24(6), 593–610. Scholar
  35. Wohlwend, K. E. (2014). Mediated discourse analysis: Tracking discourse in action. In P. Albers, T. Holbrook, & A. S. Flint (Eds.), New methods in literacy research (pp. 56–69). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Wohlwend, K. E., Buchholz, B. A., Wessel-Powell, C., Coggin, L. S., & Husbye, N. E. (2013). Literacy playshop: New literacies, popular media, and play in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen E. Wohlwend
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jill A. Scott
    • 1
  • Joanne H. Yi
    • 1
  • Amanda Deliman
    • 1
  • Tolga Kargin
    • 2
  1. 1.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Uşak ÜniversitesiUşakTurkey

Personalised recommendations