Skip to main content

A Framework of Multi-method Modelling Using System Dynamics and Enhanced Analytic Hierarchy Process Towards the Solution for Tobacco Endgame

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling, Design and Simulation of Systems (AsiaSim 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 751))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Tobacco endgame is hotly debated worldwide as one of the effort by the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) towards tobacco-free future. Tobacco epidemic involve dynamic interrelationships between multi-disciplinary elements. Hence, it become increasingly difficult to identify the root of the problem in order to solve the issues. System dynamics (SD) has been recognized with its ability to capture the flow and feedback as well as the dynamic relationships between components in a system under study. The holistic view offered by SD will portray the impact of anti-smoking strategies implementation. In order to identify the driving forces in tobacco epidemic, Enhanced Analytic Hierarchy Process (EAHP) has advantages over normal Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on its capability to eliminate inconsistency in prioritizing the driving forces in tobacco epidemic which is the initiation factors of smoking. SD and EAHP have different strengths and weaknesses, therefore, integrating both modelling approaches will provide more realistic projections of a tobacco control system. This paper uses SD and EAHP to model the complexity of the problem and to identify the dominant linkages between the initiation factors and anti-smoking strategies in assessing the effectiveness of anti-smoking strategies that have been implemented in Malaysia. We proposed a multi-method modelling framework that served as a basis in understanding the complexity of tobacco epidemic due to the interconnections of multiple elements that may range from qualitative to quantitative aspects. Also, we describe the potential benefits of integrating SD and EAHP in demonstrating the interaction between the smoking causes (initiation factors) and its corrector (anti-smoking strategies).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Eriksen, M., Mackay, J., Schluger, N., Gomeshtapeh, F.I., Drope, J.: The Tobacco Atlas, 5th edn. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization: Tobacco free initiative: why tobacco is a public health priority (2015). http://www.who.int/tobacco/health_priority/en/

  3. Flay, B.R., Petraitis, J., Hu, F.B.: The theory of triadic influence: preliminary evidence related to alcohol and tobacco use. In: Fertig, J.B., Allen, J.P. (eds.) Research Monograph No 30 : Alcohol and Tobacco: From Basic to Clinical Practice, pp. 37–59 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts, E.B., Homer, J., Kasabian, A., Varrell, M.: A systems view of the smoking problem: perspective and limitations of the role of science in decision-making. Int. J. Biomed. Comput. 13(1), 69–86 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7101(82)90051-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ITC Project, & International Tobacco Control: ITC Malaysia National Report. Findings from wave 1 to 4 Surveys (2005–2009) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad, S., Billimek, J.: Estimating the health impacts of tobacco harm reduction policies: a simulation modeling approach. Risk Anal. 25(4), 801–812 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00647.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Richardson, G.P.: How to anticipate change in tobacco control systems. In: Cancercontrol.Cancer.Gov, pp. 109–114. National Cancer Institute (2007). http://www.cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/18/m18_5.pdf

  8. Cavana, R.Y., Tobia, M.: Integrated system dynamics: analysis of policy options for tobacco control in New Zealand. In: International System Dynamics Conference, pp. 1–24 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.934

  9. Hirsch, G.B., Homer, J., Evans, E., Zielinski, A.: A system dynamics model for planning cardiovascular disease interventions. Am. J. Public Health 100(4), 616–622 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.159434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy, D.T., Cho, S.I., Kim, Y.M., Park, S., Suh, M.K., Kam, S.: SimSmoke model evaluation of the effect of tobacco control policies in Korea: the unknown success story. Am. J. Public Health 100(7), 1267–1273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.166900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zagonel, A., Mojtahedzadeh, M., Richardson, G., Brodsky, N.S., Brown, T., Conrad, S., Glass, R.: Developing a theory of the societal lifecycle of cigarette smoking: explaining & anticipating trends using information feedback. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, M., Ventakesan, P.: A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. Am. J. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 31–43 (2013). https://doi.org/10.12691/ajis-1-1-5

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuda, S.: How do the Japanese medical students evaluate the effectiveness of anti-smoking strategies?- an application of the analytic hierarchy process. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 3(2), 73–77 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Balhuwaisl, M.A.S.: An integration of rank order centroid, modified analytical hierarchy process and 0–1 integer programming in solving a facility location problem. Universiti Utara Malaysia (2013). http://etd.uum.edu.my/3862/

  15. Sterman, J.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill, New York City (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barlas, Y.: Model validation in system dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 1994 International System Dynamics Conference (1994a). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199623)12:3<183::AID-SDR103>3.0.CO;2-4

  17. Barlas, Y.: Model validation in system dynamics 12(3), 183–210 (1994b). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199623)12:3<183::AID-SDR103>3.0.CO;2-4

  18. Forrester, J.W., Senge, P.M.: Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Department of Decision Science, School of Quantitative Sciences and Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), Malaysia, for their financial support to carry out this research project. The project was funded under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) Grant No. 12902.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tisya Farida Abdul Halim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdul Halim, T.F., Sapiri, H., Zainal Abidin, N. (2017). A Framework of Multi-method Modelling Using System Dynamics and Enhanced Analytic Hierarchy Process Towards the Solution for Tobacco Endgame. In: Mohamed Ali, M., Wahid, H., Mohd Subha, N., Sahlan, S., Md. Yunus, M., Wahap, A. (eds) Modeling, Design and Simulation of Systems. AsiaSim 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 751. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6463-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6463-0_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6462-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6463-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics