Skip to main content

Bounded Rationality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behavioral Economics

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 3104 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explains bounded rationality, which is rationality bounded by human abilities. For the purpose of studying bounded rationality, the optimization approach of traditional economics has difficulties such as the infinite regress problem. Hence it has been complemented by the descriptive approach in which intuitive judgment such as heuristics is shown to often lead to biases in experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 28 July 2019

    The original version of the book was revised: Author’s belated corrections have been incorporated.

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noted that, for other purposes such as work, an economic man’s abilities are assumed to be limited, so that there can be unskilled workers and so on.

  2. 2.

    A more complicated model of bounded rationality in which the levels of reasoning of other players follow a probability distribution was proposed by Camerer et al. (2004).

  3. 3.

    Kahneman noted that Simon (1955) had proposed much earlier that decision makers should be viewed as boundedly rational.

  4. 4.

    Anchoring is a heuristics in Tversky and Kahneman’s (1974) definition, but not heuristics in Kahneman and Frederick’s (2002) definition because anchoring is not an attribute substitution.

  5. 5.

    The correct answer at the time of the experiment is not written in the paper, but the correct answer in 2006 was about 28%.

  6. 6.

    They also conducted the same experiment for amateur participants in four conditions.

  7. 7.

    The mathematical model of prospect theory, however, was born from the consideration that System 1 focuses on changes. Prospect theory is a good example of how the optimization approach can be combined with the descriptive approach.

  8. 8.

    The WYSATI bias is closely related to the concept of the worldview we explain in Chap. 9 in the sense that a person tends to believe his worldview is all there is. Tetlock and Gardner’s (2015, Chap. 10) discussion about the dilemma of the leader that she needs to make decisions with confidence and at the same time to be humble to avoid the WYSATI bias is closely related to virtue ethics that we will explain in Chap. 11 below.

References

  • Camerer, C. F., Ho, T.-H., & Cho, J.-K. (2004). A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 861–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlisk, J. (1996). Why bounded rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 669–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intutive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, R. (1995). Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 85(5), 1313–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and- adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunctional fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masao Ogaki .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ogaki, M., Tanaka, S.C. (2017). Bounded Rationality. In: Behavioral Economics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6439-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6439-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6438-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6439-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics