A Review of the Literature on Coaching in Pre-service Teacher Education

  • Garth Stahl
  • Erica Sharplin
  • Benjamin Kehrwald


This chapter focuses on previous scholarship on coaching in pre-service teacher education drawing upon 25 studies published between 1996 and 2016 (see Appendix). The chapter canvasses the diversity of coaching models in teacher education and critically considering the roles that training, feedback, reflective practice and skill development play in each model.


  1. Anderson, N. A., & Radencich, M. C. (2001). The Value of feedback in an early field experience: Peer, teacher, and supervisor coaching. Action in Teacher Education, 23(3), 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auld, R., Belfiore, P., & Scheeler, M. (2010). Increasing pre-service teachers’ use of differential reinforcement: Effects of performance feedback on consequences for student behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(2), 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton, E. E., & Wolery, M. (2007). Evaluation of E-mail Feedback on the verbal behaviors of pre-service teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 30(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendetti, T. A,. & Reed, M. K. (1998). Supervising student teachers using peer coaching. Annual meeting of the national council of teachers of mathematics. Washington: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  6. Bowman, C., & McCormick, S. (2000). Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilised concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capizzi, A. M., Wehby, J. H., & Sandmel, K. N. (2010). Enhancing mentoring of teacher candidates through consultative feedback and self-evaluation of instructional delivery. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 33(3), 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education. (2005). “National Framework for Mentoring and Coaching.” Viewed 13/06/2017 at
  10. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer: E. Scanlon and T. O’Shea.Google Scholar
  12. Cornelius, K. E., & Nagro, S. A. (2014). Evaluating the evidence base of performance feedback in preservice special education teacher training. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 37(2), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ditchburn, G. M. (2015). Remembering reflection in pre-service teachers’ professional experience. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 94–111. (online).Google Scholar
  14. Fry, J. M., & Hin, M. K. T. (2006). Peer coaching with interactive wireless technology between student teachers: Satisfaction with role and communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(3), 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 174–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardiner, W. (2012). Coaches’ and new urban teachers’ perceptions of induction coaching: Time, trust, and accelerated learning curves. The Teacher Educator, 47(3), 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gemmell, J., & Carlisle, L. (2003). Building a professional learning community in preservice teacher education: Peer coaching and video analysis. Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. Goker, S. D. (2006). Impact of peer coaching on self-efficacy and instructional skills in TEFL teacher education. System, 34(2), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. Rinehart and Winston: Holt.Google Scholar
  20. Hasbrouck, J. E. (1997). Mediated peer coaching for training preservice teachers. Journal of Special Education, 31(2), 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hooker, T. (2013). Peer coaching: A review of the literature. Waikato Journal of Education, 18(2), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving inservice training: The message of research. Educational Leadership, 37(5), 379.Google Scholar
  23. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(1), 4.Google Scholar
  24. Kelly, A. E., Baek, J. Y., Lesh, R. A. & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2008). Enabling innovations in education and systematizing their impact. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. Mahwah, GB: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kelly, N., Clarà, M., Kehrwald, B., & Danaher, P. A. (2016). Analysing the learning networks of pre-service and early career teachers. In N. Kelly, M. Clarà, B. Kehrwald, & P. A. Danaher (Eds.), Online learning networks for pre-service and early career teachers (pp. 57–66). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Körkkö, M., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., & Turunen, T. (2016). Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kraus, V., & Wehby, J. (1998). The effects of peer coaching and university supervision on the teaching behavior of preservice special education trainees. Nashville: Tennessee, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  28. Kretlow, A. G., & Bartholomew, C. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(4), 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurtts, S., & Levin, B. (2000). Using peer coaching with preservice teachers to develop reflective practice and collegial support. Teaching Education, 11(3), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, K.-H., & Miller, S. (2000). Effects of preservice peer coaching on student teachers in special education. Las Vegas, Nevada: University of Nevada.Google Scholar
  31. Lu, H.-L. (2010). Research on peer coaching in preservice teacher education—a review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 748–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu, H.-L., Griffin, L., Rosenberger, C., & Liang, B. (2007). Mentor teachers, program supervisors, and peer coaching in the student teaching experience: A phenomenological study of the experiences of mentor teachers, program supervisors, and interns. Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  33. Mallette, B., Maheady, L., & Harper, G. F. (1999). The effects of reciprocal peer coaching on preservice general educators’ instruction of students with special learning needs. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 22(4), 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic Review of design-based research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ottley, J. R., Coogle, C. G., & Rahn, N. L. (2015). The social validity of bug-in-ear coaching: Findings from two studies implemented in inclusive early childhood environments. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 36(4), 342–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ovens, A. (2004). Using peer coaching and action research to structure the practicum: An analysis of student teacher perceptions. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 37(1), 45–60.Google Scholar
  37. Rathel, J. M., Drasgow, E., & Christle, C. C. (2008). Effects of supervisor performance feedback on increasing preservice teachers’ positive communication behaviors with students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16(2), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Thead, B. K., Acker, S. E., Gable, R. A., & Zigmond, N. P. (2009). Can you hear me now?: Evaluation of an online wireless technology to provide real-time feedback to special education teachers-in-training. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 32(1), 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scheeler, M. C., & Lee, D. (2002). Using Technology to deliver immediate corrective feedback to preservice teachers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(4), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scheeler, M. C., McAfee, J. K., Ruhl, K. L., & Lee, D. L. (2006). Effects of corrective feedback delivered via wireless technology on preservice teacher performance and student behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 29(1), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K. L., & McAfee, J. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 27(4), 396–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharpe, T., Lounsbery, M., & Bahls, V. (1997). Description and effects of sequential behavior practice in teacher education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(3), 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2014). The role of feedback and social presence in an online peer coaching program for student teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  46. Vacilotto, S., & Cummings, R. (2007). Peer coaching in TEFL/TESL programmes. ELT Journal, 61(2), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wynn, M. J., & Kromrey, J. (1999). Paired peer placement with peer coaching in early field experiences: Results of a four-year study. Teacher Education Quarterly, 26(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  48. Yost, D., Sentner, S., & Forlenza-Bailey, A. (2000). An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st Century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Garth Stahl
    • 1
  • Erica Sharplin
    • 2
  • Benjamin Kehrwald
    • 3
  1. 1.University of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia
  2. 2.University of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia
  3. 3.University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations