Advertisement

Self-Interest

  • Jack Barbalet
Chapter

Abstract

Self-interest is depreciated in Confucian ethics, according to Weber’s assessment. The chapter shows, however, that traditional Chinese family relations operate through their members’ self-interested actions. The chapter examines Confucian filial piety and the tensions in family life between intergenerational and conjugal relations, each producing distinctive patterns of interests. The chapter shows that self-interest is widely acknowledged in Chinese thought traditions. The chapter develops a novel account of self-interest in which selection of different temporal phases of self (past, present, or future) account for distinctive formations of self-interest. Confucian antipathy to ‘selfishness’ relates to admonishment of satisfaction of present self-interests against those of past selves. In Daoist self-cultivation practices, on the other hand, the interests of future selves are encouraged.

References

  1. Ainslie, George. 1986. ‘Beyond Microeconomics. Conflict among Interests in a Multiple Self as a Determinant of Value’. Pp. 133–75 in The Multiple Self, edited by Jon Elster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akerlof, George A. and Kranton, Rachel E. 2010. Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages and Well-Being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ames, Roger T. 1983. The Art of Rulership: A Study in Ancient Chinese Political Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, Hugh D.R. 1979. Chinese Family and Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balazs, Etienne. 1964. Chinese Civilization and Bureaucracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barbalet, Jack. 2008a. ‘Pragmatism and Economics: William James’ Contribution’. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 32(5): 797–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbalet, Jack. 2008b. Weber, Passion and Profits: ‘The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism’ in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbalet, Jack. 2009. ‘Disinterestedness and Self Formation: Principles of Action in William Hazlitt’. European Journal of Social Theory. 12(2): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbalet, Jack. 2012. ‘Self Interest and the Theory of Action’. British Journal of Sociology. 63(3):412–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbalet, Jack. 2014. ‘Laozi’s Daodejing’. Pp. 17–31 in The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies, edited by Jenny Helin, Tor Hernes, Daniel Hjorth and Robin Holt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bauer, Wolfgang. 1976. China and the Search for Happiness. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bedford, Olwen and Hwang, Kwang-kuo. 2003. ‘Guilt and Shame in Chinese Culture: A Cross-cultural Framework from the Perspective of Morality and Identity’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 33(2): 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brook, Timothy. 1997. ‘Profit and Righteousness in Chinese Economic Culture’. Pp. 27–44 in Culture and Economy: The Shaping of Capitalism in Eastern Asia, edited by Timothy Brook and Hy V. Luong. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cheng, Chung-ying. 1986. ‘The Concept of Face and its Confucian Roots’. Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 13(3): 329–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheung, Steven N.S. 2005. ‘The Enforcement of Property Rights in Children, and the Marriage Contract’. Pp. 389–43 in his Economic Explanation: Selected Papers of Steven N.S. Cheung. Hong Kong: Arcadia Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, Myron L. 1976. House United, House Divided: The Chinese Family in Taiwan. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. 1999. ‘Mysticism and Apophatic Discourse in the Laozi’. Pp. 33–58 in Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi, edited by Mark Csikszentmihalyi and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  18. Durkheim, Emile. 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Durkheim, Emile. 1970. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  20. Eastman, Lloyd E. 1988. Family, Fields and Ancestors: Constancy and Change in China’s Social and Economic History, 1550–1949. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Elvin, Mark. 1985. ‘Between the Earth and Heaven: Conceptions of the Self in China’. Pp. 156–89 in The Category of the Person, edited by Michael Carrithers, Steven Collins and Steven Lukes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fei, Hsiao T’ung. 1962. Peasant Life in China: A Field Study of Country Life in the Yangtze Valley. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  23. Fei, Xiaotong. 1992. From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fei, Hsiao T’ung and Chang, Chih-I. 1948. Earthbound China: A Study of Rural Economy in Yunnan. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Frank, Robert H. 1988. Passion within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Freedman, Maurice. 1979. The Study of Chinese Society: Essays by Maurice Freedman, selected and Introduced by G. William Skinner. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fung, Yu-Lan. 1952. A History of Chinese Philosophy, Volume 1. Princeton: Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fung, Yu-Lan. 1998. ‘The Philosophy at the Basis of Traditional Chinese Society’. Pp. 632–39 in his Selected Philosophical Writings of Fung Yu-lan. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gardner, Daniel K. 2007. The Four Books: The Basic Teachings of the Later Confucian Tradition. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Graham, A.C. 1990. The Book of Lieh-tzǔ: A Classic of the Tao. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Greenhalgh, Susan. 1994. ‘De-Orientalizing the Chinese Family Firm’. American Ethnologist. 21(4): 746–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hall, David L. and Ames, Roger T. 1998. Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hamilton, Gary G. 1984. ‘Patriarchalism in Imperial China and Western Europe: A Revision of Weber’s Sociology of Domination’. Theory and Society. 13(3): 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamilton, Gary G. 1990. ‘Patriarchy, Patrimonialism, and Filial Piety: A Comparison of China and Western Europe’. British Journal of Sociology. 41(1): 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hazlitt, William. 1969. An Essay on the Principles of Human Action. Gainesville: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.Google Scholar
  36. Hirschman, Albert O. 1997. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ho, D.Y.F. 1998. ‘Interpersonal Relationships and Relational Dominance: An Analysis Based on Methodological Relationalism’. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 1: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ho, D.Y.F. and Chiu, C.Y. 1998. ‘Collective Representations as a Metaconstruct: An Analysis based on Methodological Relationalism’. Culture and Psychology. 4(3): 349–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hsu, Dau-lin. 1970–71. ‘The Myth of the “Five Human Relations” of Confucius’. Monumenta Serica. 29: 27–37.Google Scholar
  40. Hsu, Francis Lang-Kwang. 1943. ‘The Myth of Chinese Family Size’. American Journal of Sociology. 48(5): 555–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hwang, Kwang-kuo. 1987. ‘Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game’. American Journal of Sociology. 92(4): 944–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hwang, Kwang-kuo. 2000. ‘Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 30(2): 155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ji, Jainlin, Kleinman, Arthur and Becker, Anne E. 2001. ‘Suicide in Contemporary China: A Review of China’s Distinctive Suicide Demographics in their Sociocultural Context’. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 9(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson, Ian and Wang, Ping. 2012. Daxue and Zhongyong: Bilingual Edition, translated and annotated by Ian Johnson and Wang Ping. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  45. King, Ambrose Yeo-chi. 1985. ‘The Individual and Group in Confucianism: A Relational Perspective’. Pp. 57–70 in Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, edited by Donald J. Munro. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  46. King, Ambrose Yeo-chi. 1991. ‘Kuan-hsi and Network Building: A Sociological Interpretation’. Daedalus. 120(2): 63–84.Google Scholar
  47. Knight, Frank H. 1971. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. LaFargue, Michael. 1994. Tao and Method: A Reasoned Approach to Tao Te Ching. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  49. LaFargue, Michael. 1998. ‘Recovering the Tao-te-ching’s Original Meaning: Some Remarks on Historical Hermeneutics’. Pp. 255–75 in Lao-tzu and the Tao-te-ching, edited by Livia Kohn and Michael LaFargue. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  50. Lau, D.C. 1963. Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  51. Legge, James. 1971. Confucius: Confucian Analects, The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  52. Lee, Sing and Kleinman, Arthur. 2000. ‘Suicide as Resistance in Chinese Society’. Pp. 221–40 in Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance, edited by Elizabeth J. Perry and Mark Selden. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Liu, Athena. 1999. Family Law for the Hong Kong SAR. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lufrano, Richard John. 1997. Honorable Merchants: Commerce and Self-Cultivation in Late Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  55. Maine, Sir Henry Sumner. 1905. Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  56. Mencius. 2004. Mencius, translated with an Introduction and Notes by D.C. Lau. Revised edition. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  57. Parfit, Derek. 1986. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phillips, Michael R., Liu, Huaqing and Zhang, Yanping. 1999. ‘Suicide and Social Change in China’. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 23: 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pizzorno, Alessandro. 1986. ‘Some Other Kinds of Otherness: A Critique of “Rational Choice” Theories’. Pp. 355–73 in Development, Democracy and the Art of Trespassing: Essays in Honor of Albert O. Hirschman, edited by Alejandro Foxley, Michael S. McPherson and Guillermo O’Donnell. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  60. Qi, Xiaoying. 2011. ‘Face: A Chinese Concept in a Global Sociology’. Journal of Sociology 47(3): 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Qi, Xiaoying. 2014. Globalized Knowledge Flows and Chinese Social Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Ropp, Paul S., Zamperini, Paola and Zurndorfer, Harriet Thelma. 2001. Passionate Women: Female Suicide in Late Imperial China. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  63. Schwartz, Benjamin. 1959. ‘Some Polarities in Confucian Thought’. Pp. 50–62 in Confucianism in Action, edited by David S. Nivison and Arthur F. Wright. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Shang, Yang. 2006. The Book of Lord Shang, translated into English by J.J.L. Duyvendak and into Modern Chinese by Gao Heng. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, Adam. 1979. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by D.D. Raphael and A.L. Macfie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Veblen, Thornstein. 1946. The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  67. Veblen, Thornstein. 1970. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
  68. Wang, Bi. 1999. ‘Outline Introduction to the Laozi (Laozi zhilue)’. Pp. 30–47 in The Classic of the Way and Virtue: A New Translation of the Tao-te ching of Loazi as Interpreted by Wang Bi, translated by Richard John Lynn. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Watson, Rubie S. 2004. ‘Wives, Concubines and Maids: Servitude and Kinship in the Hong Kong Region, 1900–1940’. Pp. 169–98 in James L. Watson and Rubie S. Watson, Village Life in Hong Kong: Politics, Gender and Ritual in the New Territories. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Weber, Max. 1964. The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism, translated and edited by Hans H. Gerth, with an Introduction by C.K. Yang. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  71. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  72. Weber, Max. 1970. ‘The Social Psychology of World Religions’. Pp. 267–301 in From Max Weber, edited by H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Weber, Max. 1991. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by Talcott Parsons. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  74. Wolf, Margery. 1975. ‘Women and Suicide in China’. Pp. 111–41 in Women in Chinese Society, edited by Margery Wolf and Roxane Witke. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wu, Fei. 2011. ‘Suicide, A Modern Problem in China’. Pp. 213–36 in Deep China: The Moral Life of the Person, edited by Arthur Kleinman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  76. Yang, C.K. 1959. ‘Some Characteristics of Chinese Bureaucratic Behavior’. Pp. 134–64 in Confucianism in Action, edited by David S. Nivison and Arthur F. Wright. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack Barbalet
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations