Abstract
Despite the advances in neuropsychology and codification of various determinants of aesthetics, aesthetics largely remains a nonquantifiable subjective aspect. Though, elements of grammar of aesthetics have been qualitatively defined, it is still not possible to describe the aesthetics in quantitative terms in the same way as we can describe the dynamics or acoustics of an industrial object. On the other hand, it forms one of the most important components of industrial design—especially, automobile design. This creates an anomaly where the large chunk of automobile design remains in the realm of mathematics, aesthetics remains out of its ambit. This creates a gaping hole in the material available on automobile design, which the book proposes to fill. Since, motorcycle has a far more complex visual aesthetics compared to a four-wheeler, as it is composed of several components as diverse as an engine to seat to wheels to windscreen whereas car is more or less a single object visually. So, motorcycle has been chosen as an object to deconstruct aesthetics in order to quantify it. This chapter takes the reader to a short visit through the book and explains what one should expect from the book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chitturi, Ravindra. 2009. Emotions by design: A consumer perspective. International Journal of Design 3 (2): 7–17.
Rust, C. 2007. Unstated contributions-How artistic inquiry can inform interdisciplinary research. International Journal of design 1 (3): 69–76.
Kim, Bo-Young, and Bum-Kyu Kang. 2008. Cross-functional cooperation with design teams in new product development. International Journal of design 2 (3): 43–54.
Crilly, Nathan, Maier, Anja and Clarkson P.John. 2008. Representing artifacts as media: Modeling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience. International Journal of Design 2 (3): 15–27.
Schifferstein, Hendrik N.J, and Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, Elly P.H. 2008. Consumer-product attachment: Measurement and design implications. International Journal of Design 2 (3): 1–13.
Norman, Donald A. 2005. Emotional design, why we love (or Hate) everyday things. USA, Basic Books, 1: 21–24.
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2006. The semantic turn, a new foundation for design, 39–175. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Goldie, Peter. 2009. Narrative thinking, emotion and planning. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2): 97–106.
Pratt, Richard, J. 2011. How perception works and its role in creating engaging design. In Design Principles and Practices International Conference at Sapienza, Italy: University of Rome.
Campbell. I. G. 1940. Factors which work towards unity or coherence in visual design. Elsevier, 146–162.
Kotnik, Toni. Algorithmic design: Structuralism reloaded. 327–335.
Cruickshank, Leon. 2011. The case for a re-evaluation of deconstruction and design; against Derrida, Eisenman and their choral works. The Radical Designist 1–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chandra, S. (2018). Introduction: Motorcycle and the Semantics of Design. In: Aesthetics: Quantification and Deconstruction. Design Science and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6235-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6235-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6234-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6235-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)