Skip to main content

Benefits of Using Constructability, Operability, and Maintainability in Infrastructure Projects: A Meta-Synthesis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Planning and construction of infrastructure projects are increasing rapidly as the vital lifeline of countries for welfare and economic development; which considering cumulative population growth, they are in the center of attention more than ever. High investments, negative effects of early destruction and available duplications in these projects have enlarged necessity of focus on existing post design problems. In order to reduce problems of post design stages in infrastructure projects, constructability, operability, and maintainability concepts can be used in the initial pre-construction stage, which is a project management technique for reviewing post design processes from beginning to end. These concepts emphasize on early presence of construction, operation and maintenance contractors at the early phases of the project, so that through integrating knowledge and experience, reduce problems due to lack of applying them at the early stages of the project. Lack of comprehensive and centralized research that study benefits of applying these concepts, made researchers to conduct this project. This investigation, by the aim of evaluating benefits of applying these concepts in infrastructure projects and by using meta-synthesis method and utilizing qualitative analysis software NVIVO, has classified these benefits in different phases of the project life cycle. Finally, a classified structure of the benefits of implementing these concepts in different phases of the project has been provided; which by evaluating the obtained results and applying them, experts and various agents of the project can share their experiences and knowledge with each other efficiently. This study results in reduction of available problems due to lack of applying the concepts at the early stages of the project by highlighting awareness toward such brilliant benefits presented in the world investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Alikhah F (2010) Social impact assessment: at the Qazvin-Rasht highway. In: 10rd Scientific conference of University of Guilan

    Google Scholar 

  • Alinaitwe H, Nyamutale W, Tindiwensi D (2014) Design phase constructability improvement strategies for highway projects in Uganda. J Constr Dev Countries 19(1):127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen D (1993) What is building maintenance? Facilities 11(3):7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson SD, Fisher DJ, Rahman SP (2000) Integration constructability into project development: a process approach

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson SD, Fisher DJ, Rahman SP (2000) Integrating constructability tools into constructability review process. J Constr Eng Manageent

    Google Scholar 

  • Azkia M, Tavakoli M (2006) Meta-analysis of studies on job satisfaction in educational organizations. J Soc Sci. Iran. No. 27:26-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiden BK, Price DF (2011) The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness. Int J Project Manage 29:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley P, Richards L (2000) NVivo qualitative project book. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard BS, Verma DC, Peterson EL (1995) Maintainability: a key to effective serviceability and maintenance management. Wiley, New York, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs J (2006) Cochrane qualitative research methods group. The Cochrane Collaboration, URL: http://www.joannabriggs.eduau/cqrmg/role.html

  • Chew MYL, Tan SS, Kang KH (2004) Building maintainability—review of state of the art. J Archit Eng 10:3(80):80–87. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431

  • Constructability A Primer. Publication 3-1. Austin, T.C.I.I.C.T.F., July 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabaq Kashani Z (2011) Identify the critical success factors for implementation within the framework of business management in Iranian organizations. Alzahra University thesis, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (2013) Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. Int J Project Manage

    Google Scholar 

  • De Silva N, Dulaimi MF, Ling FYY, Ofori G (2004) Improving the maintainability of building in Singapore. Build Environ

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon BS (1999) Engineering maintainability. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A (2005) Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan M, Blayden R (2001) Venture maintainability : a pass to project success. J Qual Maint Eng

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunston PS, Williamson CE (1999) Incorporating maintainability in constructability review process. J Manage Eng

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunston PS, McManus JF, Gambatese JA (2001) Cost/benefits of constructability reviews. National Cooperative Highway Research Program

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunston PS, Gambatese JA, McManus JF (2007) A cost and benefit model for constructability review implementation. ASCE

    Google Scholar 

  • Heising W (2012) The integration of ideation and project portfolio management a key factor for sustainable success. Int J Project Manage 30:582–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman Willis T, Willis WD (1995) A quality performance management system for industrial construction engineering projects. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 13(9), 1996:38–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines JA, Kokkinos A, Fedock DS (2001) Benefit of SCR design for constructability. POWER-GEN International, Dec 11–130, Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.A

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivory CJ, Thwaited A, Vaughan R (2001) Design for maintainability: the innovation process in long term engineering projects. Paper presented at the future of innovation studies, Eindhoven, Netherland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadidoleslami S, Saghat Foroush E, Heravi Torbati A, Athari Nikooravan H (2015) Assessing barriers to the implementation of the concept of constructability in the construction industry. In: 3rd International congress on civil engineering, Architecture and Urban Development, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadidoleslami S, Saghat Foroush E, Heravi Torbati A, Athari Nikooravan H (2016) Provide solutions to increase constructability based on principles of constructability of the construction industry. In: 3rd National & 1st international conference on applied researches in civil engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning, KHAJEH NASIREDDIN TOOSI University, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim H (2010) Evaluation of attempts for efficient road maintenance knowledge compilation. Dept of Highway Engineering, Swedish Royal Institute of Technology, Dalarna University, 781 88 Borlange, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim H, Magnusson R (2008) Road design for future maintenance problems and possibilities. J Trans Eng

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartam NA (1996) Making effective use of construction lessons project learned life cycle. J Constr Eng Manage

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy R, Kirwan B (1998) Development of a hazard and operability-based method for identifying safety management vulnerabilities in high risk systems. Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordestani N, Saghatforoush E, Athari Nikooravan H (2015) Identification and assessment of the entrance barriers of maintenance contractors to the preliminary studies, design and construction in infrastructure projects. In: 3rd International congress on civil engineering, Architecture and Urban Development, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordestani N, Saghat Foroush E, Athari Nikooravan H (2016) Assessment & identify the solutions to enhance maintenance contractors participation in the design and construction implementation stages of infrastructure projects. In: 3rd National & 1st international conference on applied researches in civil engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning, KHAJEH NASIREDDIN TOOSI University, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling FYY, Toh BGY, Kumaraswamy M, Wong K (2014) Strategies for integrating design and construction and operations and maintenance supply chains in Singapore. Struct Surv 32(2):158–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarand (Mark) H, Halpin DW, Hong T (2004) Constructability, maintainability, and operability of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bridge deck panels

    Google Scholar 

  • Markeset T, Moreno-Trejo J, Kumar R (2013) Maintenance of subsea petroleum production systems: a case study. J Qual Maint Eng

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier JR, Russell JS (2000) Model process for implementing maintainability. J Constr Eng Manage, Nov/Dec

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng X (2013) Involvement of facilities management specialists in building design: United Kingdom experience. J Performance Constr Facil, Sept/Oct

    Google Scholar 

  • Naderpajouh N, Oh EH, Hastak M, Gokhale S (2015) Integration of the construction knowledge and expertise in front-end planning. J Constr Eng Manage

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafi F et al (2013) Meta-synthesis of qualitative research in nursing: a case study. J Res Health Sci Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Nouri FMS (2005) Standardization of processes and technical knowledge engineering department managing large projects as EPC. In: 2nd International project management conference, Tehran, Mar 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn ML, Islam PE, El-adaway H (2014) Buildability, constructability, operability, and environmental checklist: potential role in reducing conflicts, claims, and disputes. ASCE

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford advanced learners dictionary of current English, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson BL, Thorne S (2003) The potential of metasynthesis for nursing care effectiveness research. Can J Nurs Res 35:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt MJ (1994) Hazard and operability studies: a tool for management analysis. Facilities 12(13), 1994:5–8, MCB University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulaski MH, Horman MJ (2005) Organizing constructability knowledge for design. J Constr Eng Manage 131(8)

    Google Scholar 

  • Radtke MW, Russell JS (1993) Project-level model process for implementing constructability. J Constr Eng Manage 119(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghatforoush E (2012) Extending of constructability concept to include operation and maintenance issues. In: 1st International construction and business management symposium. Kuala Lampur, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghatforoush E (2014) Extension of construction to include operation and maintenance for infrastructure project. Queensland University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghatforoush E, Trigunarsyah B, Too E, Heravitorbati A (2011) Effectiveness of constructability concept in the provision of infrastructure assets. In: 1st International postgraduate conference on engineering, Designing and Developing the Built Environment for Sustainable Wellbeing, Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen Q, Lo KK, Wang Q (1998) Priority setting in maintenance management: a modified multi-attribute approach using analytic hierarchy process. Constr Manage Econ 16:693–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirpak K et al (2010) Meta-synthesis of qualitative research in the health sciences. Iran J Epidemiol 6(1):51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JG, Principal (2006) Construction analysis and planning. LLC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sødal AH, Lædre O, Svalestuen F, Lohne J (2014) Early contractor involvement: advantage and disadvantage for the design team. J Design Manage

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleqani S (2011) Improve the implementation of road projects on BOT method using risk management. Master’s thesis. Iran University of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennessee Department of Transportation Construction Division (2016) Constructability review procedures manual

    Google Scholar 

  • Thabet W (2000) Design/Construction integration thru virtual construction for improved constructability

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigunarsyah B, Skitmore M (2010) The key to successful implementation: project management of sustainable infrastructure provision

    Google Scholar 

  • Uwohali-Incorporated (1996) Operability in systems concepts and designs: survey, assessment, and implementation. NASA, Huntsville, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadadhir A (2011) The results of meta-synthesis of qualitative analysis and cultural studies: reality or illusion

    Google Scholar 

  • Weed ME, Sports tourism research 2000–2004 (2006) A systematic review of knowledge and a meta-evaluation of methods. J Sport Tourism 11(1):5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells J (1986) The construction industry in developing countries: alternative strategies for development. Croom Helm Ltd., London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong FWH, Lam PTI, Chan EHW, Shen LY (2005) A study of measures to constructability. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 24(6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahyapour S, Shami Zanjani M (2012) The conceptual framework knowledge management benefits of using meta-synthesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Yik FWH, Lai JHK, Chau CK, Lee WL, Chan KT (2010) Operation and maintenance the perception of Hong Kong’s general public about building service. J Facil Manage 8(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yustisia H (2014) The evaluation of constructability towards construction safety. Case study: Kelok-9 Bridge project, West Sumatera

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanganeh M (2004) Providing a framework of strategic purchasing portfolio using the methodology of meta-synthesis. Master’s thesis, Tehran University, School of Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Zidane YJ-T, Stordal KB, Johnsen A, Van Raalte S (2015) Barriers and challenges in employing of concurrent engineering within the Norwegian construction projects. Proc Econ Finance 494–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer L (2006) Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. J Adv Nurs 53(3):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolfagharian M, Latifi M (2011) Grounded theory with Nvivo8 proper task of promoting Imam Sadeq

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Saghatforoush .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jadidoleslami, S., Saghatforoush, E., Kordestani Ghaleenoe, N., Preece, C. (2018). Benefits of Using Constructability, Operability, and Maintainability in Infrastructure Projects: A Meta-Synthesis. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics