Skip to main content

Assessment of Energy Efficiency for Retrofit Versus Reconstruction Projects by Building Information Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Abstract

Nowadays, Building Information Modeling (BIM) is the leading technological advance in project management life cycle of constructions. Being able to see post construction phase is one of the non-conventional benefits of BIM of which provides the user to proactively plan the projects. In this study, a retrofit and a reconstruction project were handled in their post construction process to assess their energy efficiency in terms of carbon dioxide emissions and embedded energy results. Generally, structural retrofit basically traces on two principles such as the reliability of the structure and the cost of retrofitting. However, in this study, structural retrofitting was investigated in terms of its energy efficiency compared to a reconstructed building. In this context, a structural retrofit and a new construction with same conditions and dimensions were created with a BIM software and carbon dioxide emission and embedded energy results of these two projects were evaluated. The analysis results indicated that the proportion of carbon dioxide emissions and embedded energy in new construction is higher than retrofitted structure. Consequently, the main factors that cause to higher embedded energy and carbon emission difference between new structure and retrofitted structure were found as concrete and reinforcement steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2011) Energy and environmental benefits in public buildings as a result of retrofit actions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(1):460–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chidiac SE, Catania EJC, Morofsky E, Foo S (2011) Effectiveness of single and multiple energy retrofit measures on the energy consumption of office buildings. Energy 36(8):5037–5052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong B, Kennedy C, Pressnail K (2005) Comparing life cycle implications of building retrofit and replacement options. Can J Civ Eng 32(6):1051–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hens H, Verbeeck G, Verdonck B (2001) Impact of energy efficiency measures on the CO2 emissions in the residential sector, a large scale analysis. Energy Build 33(3):275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langston C, Wong FK, Hui EC, Shen LY (2008) Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Build Environ 43(10):1709–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Cooper P, Daly D, Ledo L (2012) Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build 55:889–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejat P, Jomehzadeh F, Taheri MM, Gohari M, Majid MZA (2015) A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:843–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Demirdöğen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Demirdöğen, G., Isık, Z. (2018). Assessment of Energy Efficiency for Retrofit Versus Reconstruction Projects by Building Information Modeling. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics