Skip to main content

Analysis and Optimization of Key Index of Public Investment Building Project’s Performance Evaluation Based on Project Governance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 3714 Accesses

Abstract

In order to improve performance evaluation systems, this paper analyses and optimises the indexes for a public investment-building project. A new public management theory and law-based administration theory are used as project governance methods. The funds are as follows: a three-level index dividing and 23 indexes will guarantee the effects of the evaluation, and an index supplement and appendix produce positive meanings on index definition and evaluation oriented results. However, partly index define indistinct and hardly quantify, besides, key information reflect insufficient in index system. By amending common parts and unique indexes, the index system to optimise a project’s performance evaluation will be more objective, reasonable, and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Amaka O (2011) The critical success factors influencing project performance in Nigeria. Inter J Manag Sci Eng Manag 6(5):343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai JF (2010) Research on evaluation of agent construction project process performance and improvement of management performance[D]. Tianjing: Project Management, Tianjing University

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks MR, Pallis AA (2008) Assessing port governance models: process and performance components. Marit Policy Manag Flagship J Int Shipping Port Res 35(4):411–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du YL (2009) Research on the improvement of public project management performance based on project governance: positive study on enterprise agent construction project[D]. Project Management, Tianjing University, Tianjing

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao XZ (2009) Research on public projects performance evaluation system and performance realization mechanism[D]. Tianjing: Technology Economics and Management, Tianjing university

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilherme BBV, Francisco JKN, Fernando GA (2014) Governance, governance models and port performance: a systematic review. Transp Rev 34(5):645–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu F (2012) Research on performance assessment system of large-scale public project[D]. Hu nan: Management Science and Technology, Hunan University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang BG, Zhao XB (2015) Review of global performance measurement and benchmarking initiatives. Int J Constr Manag 15(4):265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerry CTW, HT Tsai, MH Shih, HH Fu (2008) Government performance evaluation using a balanced scorecard with a fuzzy linguistic scale. Serv Indus J 30(3):449–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin XH, Doloi H, Gao SY (2007) Relationship-based determinants of building project performance in China. Constr Manag Econ 25(3):297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li HM, David A, Wang ZF (2012) Transaction-related issues and construction project performance. Constr Manag Econ 30(2):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei Z (2006) The new public management theory and its significance. Adm Tribune, 1:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Michail K, Rachel C, Ghassan A (2001) Performance management in construction: a conceptual framework. Constr Manag Econ 19(1):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min R (2013) The study on the evaluation index of government investment project performance auditing[D]. Project Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladen V, Mladen R (2013) The balanced scorecard and EFQM working together in a performance management framework in construction industry. J Civ Eng Manag 19(5):683–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkker DM (2003) The Oxford companion to law[M]. Translated by Li Shuangyuan. Beijing: Law Press, pp 990–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu JN, Zhang L, Yan B, Liu J (2009) Design research on public project performance evaluation index system—basing on multidimensional framework of factors application. Proj Manag Technol 04:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XC (2012) Research on public investment project performance evaluation[D]. Chengdu: Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung JFY, Chan APC, Chan DWM (2008) Establishing quantitative indicators for measuring the partnering performance of construction projects in Hong Kong. Constr Manag Econ 26(3):277–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y.S. Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Liu, F., He, W., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Li, J. (2018). Analysis and Optimization of Key Index of Public Investment Building Project’s Performance Evaluation Based on Project Governance. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics