Abstract
I propose a new theoretical framework to fill the gap between social theory and agent-based models. Agent-based models have been popular in sociology because both of them assume that interactions of actors are the key to understanding and explaining social phenomena. However, there is a gap between social theory and agent-based models. Social theory emphasizes the importance of reflexivity and meaning in sociological study because actors reflect their goals and try to discover a new goal as in the case of Protestants in Max Weber’s work. They discovered the concept of vocation (Beruf in German) and added new meanings to their occupations. Then success in their occupational life became their goal. By contrast, agent-based models have not seriously considered them. This has led agent-based models to a niche in sociology. Thus for agent-based modeling to flourish in sociology, agent-based modelers need to incorporate reflexivity and meaning in their models. To do that, two mechanisms should be analyzed: a mechanism of the move between backward-looking rationality, forward-looking rationality, and reflexivity and a mechanism in which agents discover a new goal. I apply a meta rational theory (Sato 2016) to the first mechanism and show how actors move among the three components. Then, to explore the second mechanism, I assume that agents have limited cognitive capacity and propose a dynamic process in which agents discover a new goal. My new theoretical framework will make agent-based modeling more powerful in sociological study and, therefore, more attractive to sociologists.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
S stands for sucker because agent i is exploited by agent j, while T stands for temptation because agentj is tempted to defect.
- 2.
P stands for punishment because agents i and j are punished by choosing to defect, while R stands for reward because they are rewarded by choosing to cooperate.
- 3.
There are various agent-based models, and some do not follow this logic. However, I propose the simplest version of agent-based models so that the logic would be comprehensible to readers who are not familiar with it.
References
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2): 203–226.
Bruch, Elizabeth E., and Robert D. Mare. 2006. Neighborhood choice and neighborhood change. American Journal of Sociology 112 (3): 667–709.
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Imada, Takatoshi. 1986. Self-organization: Revival of Social Theory Keiso Shobo. (In Japanese).
Luhmann, Niklas. 1984. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie Suhrkamp.
Macy, Michael W., and John Skvoretz. 1998. The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. American Sociological Review 63 (5): 638–660.
Macy, Michael W., and Robert Willer. 2002. From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 143–166.
Merton, Robert K. 1949. Social theory and social structure: Toward the codification of theory and research. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Sato, Yoshimichi. 2016. “Exploring moving mechanism between forward-looking and backward-looking rational actions: Toward a meta rational choice theory.” Paper presented at the 111th American Sociological Association meeting.
Schelling, Thomas C. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1 (2): 143–186.
Weber, Max. 1920. Die protestantische Ethik und der \(\ll \)Geist\(\gg \) der Kapitalismus in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Bd. I.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sato, Y. (2017). Does Agent-based Modeling Flourish in Sociology? Mind the Gap between Social Theory and Agent-based Models. In: Endo, K., Kurihara, S., Kamihigashi, T., Toriumi, F. (eds) Reconstruction of the Public Sphere in the Socially Mediated Age. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6138-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6138-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6137-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6138-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)