Environmental Disasters in the Mekong Subregion: Looking Beyond State Boundaries

Chapter

Abstract

Using a political science lens, this chapter draws on original research in the Mekong region with a special focus on environmental disasters and water (in)security using the Xayabouri Dam as a case study. Key findings include that it is important to look beyond the state boundaries, achieving a regional perspective as this is the only way to tackle transboundary challenges and increase resilience to environmental disasters as linkages between the global, regional and national level and between different levels of governance shape how disasters occur and how their impact is distributed.

Keywords

Environmental disasters Mekong sub-region Trans boundary governance Hydropower Urbanisation 

References

  1. Campbell, I. C. (2009). Chapter 1: Introduction. In I. C. Campbell (Ed.), The Mekong: Biophysical environment of an International River basin (pp. 1–11). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Central Intelligence Agency (2015a). ‘Cambodia’, in The World Factbook, CIA, Washington, DC, viewed 23 November 2015, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cb.html.
  3. Central Intelligence Agency (2015b). ‘Laos’, in the world Factbook, CIA, Washington, DC, viewed 23 November 2015, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/la.html.
  4. Chan, F. K. S., Mitchell, G., Adekola, O., & McDonald, A. (2012). Flood risk in Asia’s urban mega-deltas: Drivers, impacts and response. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 3(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daily Fusion (2013). China becomes ‘key investor’ in Southeast Asia’s hydropower. Daily Fusion, 19 August.Google Scholar
  6. Dun, O. (2011). Migration and displacement triggered by floods in the Mekong Delta. International Migration, 49(S1), 200–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emmers, R., Greener-Barcham, B., & Thomas, N. (2006). Institutional arrangements to counter human trafficking in the Asia-Pacific. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 28(3), 490–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernquest, J (2012). Rice exports: Fall from 1st to 3rd. Bangkok Post, 25 October.Google Scholar
  9. Frey, F. W. (1993). The political context of conflict and co-operation over international river basins. Water International, 18(1), 5468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friend, R. M., Thinphanga, P., MacClune, K., Henceroth, J., Tran, P. V. G., & Nghiem, T. P. (2014). Urban transformations and changing patterns of local risk: lessons from the Mekong Region. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(1), 3043.Google Scholar
  11. Garschangen, M. (2015). Risky change? Vietnam’s urban flood risk governance between climate dynamics and transformation. Pacific Affairs, 88(3), 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water and conflict: Fresh water resources and international security. International Security, 18(1), 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goh, E. (2006). China in the Mekong River basin: The regional security implications of resource development on the Lancang Jiang. In M. Caballero-Anthony, R. Emmers, & A. Acharya (Eds.), Non-traditional security in Asia. Hampshire: AshgateGoogle Scholar
  14. Guttman, H (2012). ‘Keynote: Water, food and energy security in the Mekong Basin’, delivered at Mekong2Rio International Conference on Transboundary River Basin Management, Phuket, Thailand, 1 May.Google Scholar
  15. Haefner, A. (2013a). Non-traditional security: The case of environmental challenges in the Mekong subregion. Pacific Geographies, 40, 17–22.Google Scholar
  16. Haefner, A. (2013b). Regional environmental security: Cooperation and challenges in the Mekong subregion. Global Change, Peace and Security, 25(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haefner, A (2014). Cooperation and conflict along transnational rivers: The role of regional institutions, paper delivered at the Oceanic Conference for International Studies, Melbourne, Australia, July.Google Scholar
  18. Hensengerth, O. (2009). Money and security: China’s strategic interests in the Mekong River basin, Chatham House Briefing Paper. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  19. International Center for Environmental Management (2010). Environmental assessment of hydropower on the Mekong mainstream: Summary of the Final Report. Prepared for the Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  20. IRN. (2001). Planned dams in Vietnam, report. Berkeley: International River Network.Google Scholar
  21. IRN. (2011). The Xayaburi dam: A looming threat to the Mekong river, fact sheet. Berkerley: International River Network.Google Scholar
  22. IRN (2013a). The Mekong dams dispute: Four trends to watch. Viewed 29 April 2016, https://www.internationalrivers.org/blogs/267/the-mekong-dams-dispute-four-trends-to-watch.
  23. IRN. (2013b). ‘Pöyry’s role in the Xayabouri dam controversy’, factsheet. Berkerley: International Rivers Network.Google Scholar
  24. Japan Environmental Council. (2005). The Mekong region: Incorporating the views of regional civil society. In Japan Environmental Council (Ed.), The state of the environment in Asia (pp. 131–150). Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lazarus, K., Dubeau, P., Bambaradeniya, R., Friend, R., & Sylavong, L. (2006). An uncertain future: Biodiversity and livelihoods along the Mekong River in northern Lao PDR. Vientiane: The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Lao PDR Country Office.Google Scholar
  26. Lebel, L, Sinh, BT, Garden, P, Bui, VH, Subsin, N, Le, AT, Nguyen, TPVV (2013) Risk reduction or redistribution? Flood management in the Mekong region. ResearchGate, December.Google Scholar
  27. Lowi, M. R. (1999). Water and conflict in the Middle East and south Asia: Are environmetnal issues and security issues linked? Journal of Environment and Development, 8(4), 376–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin-Nagle, R, Howard, E, Wiltse, A Duncan, D (2011). Conference Synopsis: Bonn2011 Conference: the Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus: Solutions for the Green Economy, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and OOSKAnews, Inc., Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  29. Matthews, N. (2012). Water grabbing in the Mekong Basin: An analysis of the winners and losers of Thailand’s hydropower development in Lao PDR. Water Alternatives, 5(2), 392–411.Google Scholar
  30. Mehtonen, K., Keskinen, M., & Varis, O. (2008). The Mekong: Iwrm and institutions. In O. Varis, A. K. Biswas, & C. Tortajada (Eds.), Management of transboundary rivers and lakes. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Mekong River Commission (1995). Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong River basin. Chiang Rai, Thailand: Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, M. A., & Douglass, M. (2015). Governing flooding in Asia’s urban transition. Pacific Affairs, 88(3), 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mueller, H (2007). In Feist, S. (Ed.), Hoffnung Auf Das Kleine Korn: in Den Philippinen Waechst Der Reis Der Zukunft (Hope for the little corn: The Philipines grow rice for the future. Weltmacht Wasser (Worldpower Water), Munich, Germany: Herbig.Google Scholar
  34. Neo, L. (2012). Climate change impacts, vulnerabilities and adaptation measures in the lower Mekong Basin. Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management, 4(4), 355–378.Google Scholar
  35. Ponte, E. (2012). Preliminary analysis of water security in the Mekong River basin, UNU-CRIS working papers 12. Brugge: United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studie.Google Scholar
  36. Radio Free Asia (2013). Laos confirms ‘preparatory’ work on controversial dam project. Radio Free Asia, viewed 10 August 2013, http://www.rfa.org/english/news/laos/confirms-07312013151754.html.
  37. Roberts, TR (2001). Downstream ecological implications of China’s Lancang hydropower and Mekong navigation project. Paper delivered at the International Symposium on Biodiversity Management and Sustainable Development in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin, Xishuangbanna, China.Google Scholar
  38. Schaffer, A., & Li, D. (2012). Strenghtening climate adaptation in the lower Mekong River basin through a regional adaption action network. Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management, 4(4), 527–547.Google Scholar
  39. Schmidiger, R., & Sierotzki, K. (2015). Xayaburi hydroelectric power project. Vientiane: Pöry.Google Scholar
  40. Schneider, K (2011). Water challenges Asia’s rising powers—part I. Yale Global Online, viewed 29 April 2016, http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/water-challenges-asia-powers-part-i .
  41. Schultz, B., & Uhlenbrook, S. (2007). Water security: What does it mean, what may it imply?’, discussion draft paper for session on water security. Delft: UNESCO-IHE (Institute for Water Education).Google Scholar
  42. Southeast Asia River Network. (2004). Downstream impacts of hydropower and development of an interantional river: A case study of Lancang-Mekong. Chiang Mai: Southeast Asia River Network (SEARIN).Google Scholar
  43. Task Force on Transboundary Waters. (2008). Transboundary waters: Sharing benefits, sharing responsibilitites. Zaragoza: UN-Water Thematic Paper.Google Scholar
  44. Vannarith, C. (2012). ‘A Cambodian perspective on Mekong River water security’, blog post. Phnom Penh: Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace (CICP).Google Scholar
  45. Varchol, D (2012). The Mekong [film].Google Scholar
  46. Viet Nam News (2015). Mekong faces water shortage. Viet Nam News, 9 October 2015. http://vietnamnews.vn/society/276846/mekong-faces-water-shortage.html.
  47. Wolf, A. T. (1998). Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy, 1(2), 251–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith Asia InstituteBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations