Skip to main content

Environmental Disasters in the Mekong Subregion: Looking Beyond State Boundaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crossing Borders
  • 545 Accesses

Abstract

Using a political science lens, this chapter draws on original research in the Mekong region with a special focus on environmental disasters and water (in)security using the Xayabouri Dam as a case study. Key findings include that it is important to look beyond the state boundaries, achieving a regional perspective as this is the only way to tackle transboundary challenges and increase resilience to environmental disasters as linkages between the global, regional and national level and between different levels of governance shape how disasters occur and how their impact is distributed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The nexus approach has gained momentum in the last 5 years especially after the Bonn 2011 Conference and the Nexus 2014 conference and has attracted significant interest from international organizations, the private sector and other global players as a way of tackling the interdependencies between water, energy and food security. The nexus approach focuses on the urgent need for joined initiatives to policy and practice which lies at the heart of the nexus approach.

  2. 2.

    Environmental degradation is here defined according to the UNISRD as ‘the reduction of the capacity of the environment to meet social and ecological objectives and needs’.

  3. 3.

    EGAT is a Thai state enterprise that owns and manages the majority of Thailand’s electricity generation capacity, as well as the nation’s transmission network.

  4. 4.

    Gold panning is still a big source of income in Laos, especially for women living around Luang Prabang.

  5. 5.

    Pöyry is a Finnish-based global consulting and engineering firm focusing on energy, forestry, infrastructure and environment.

  6. 6.

    Construction on the Don Sahong Dam started in 2014. Until today, it is disputed by many if the dam is a mainstream or tributary dam due to its location.

References

  • Campbell, I. C. (2009). Chapter 1: Introduction. In I. C. Campbell (Ed.), The Mekong: Biophysical environment of an International River basin (pp. 1–11). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Intelligence Agency (2015a). ‘Cambodia’, in The World Factbook, CIA, Washington, DC, viewed 23 November 2015, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cb.html.

  • Central Intelligence Agency (2015b). ‘Laos’, in the world Factbook, CIA, Washington, DC, viewed 23 November 2015, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/la.html.

  • Chan, F. K. S., Mitchell, G., Adekola, O., & McDonald, A. (2012). Flood risk in Asia’s urban mega-deltas: Drivers, impacts and response. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 3(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily Fusion (2013). China becomes ‘key investor’ in Southeast Asia’s hydropower. Daily Fusion, 19 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dun, O. (2011). Migration and displacement triggered by floods in the Mekong Delta. International Migration, 49(S1), 200–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmers, R., Greener-Barcham, B., & Thomas, N. (2006). Institutional arrangements to counter human trafficking in the Asia-Pacific. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 28(3), 490–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernquest, J (2012). Rice exports: Fall from 1st to 3rd. Bangkok Post, 25 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, F. W. (1993). The political context of conflict and co-operation over international river basins. Water International, 18(1), 5468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend, R. M., Thinphanga, P., MacClune, K., Henceroth, J., Tran, P. V. G., & Nghiem, T. P. (2014). Urban transformations and changing patterns of local risk: lessons from the Mekong Region. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(1), 3043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garschangen, M. (2015). Risky change? Vietnam’s urban flood risk governance between climate dynamics and transformation. Pacific Affairs, 88(3), 599–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water and conflict: Fresh water resources and international security. International Security, 18(1), 79–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, E. (2006). China in the Mekong River basin: The regional security implications of resource development on the Lancang Jiang. In M. Caballero-Anthony, R. Emmers, & A. Acharya (Eds.), Non-traditional security in Asia. Hampshire: Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, H (2012). ‘Keynote: Water, food and energy security in the Mekong Basin’, delivered at Mekong2Rio International Conference on Transboundary River Basin Management, Phuket, Thailand, 1 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, A. (2013a). Non-traditional security: The case of environmental challenges in the Mekong subregion. Pacific Geographies, 40, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, A. (2013b). Regional environmental security: Cooperation and challenges in the Mekong subregion. Global Change, Peace and Security, 25(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, A (2014). Cooperation and conflict along transnational rivers: The role of regional institutions, paper delivered at the Oceanic Conference for International Studies, Melbourne, Australia, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensengerth, O. (2009). Money and security: China’s strategic interests in the Mekong River basin, Chatham House Briefing Paper. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Center for Environmental Management (2010). Environmental assessment of hydropower on the Mekong mainstream: Summary of the Final Report. Prepared for the Mekong River Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRN. (2001). Planned dams in Vietnam, report. Berkeley: International River Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRN. (2011). The Xayaburi dam: A looming threat to the Mekong river, fact sheet. Berkerley: International River Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRN (2013a). The Mekong dams dispute: Four trends to watch. Viewed 29 April 2016, https://www.internationalrivers.org/blogs/267/the-mekong-dams-dispute-four-trends-to-watch.

  • IRN. (2013b). ‘Pöyry’s role in the Xayabouri dam controversy’, factsheet. Berkerley: International Rivers Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Environmental Council. (2005). The Mekong region: Incorporating the views of regional civil society. In Japan Environmental Council (Ed.), The state of the environment in Asia (pp. 131–150). Tokyo: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, K., Dubeau, P., Bambaradeniya, R., Friend, R., & Sylavong, L. (2006). An uncertain future: Biodiversity and livelihoods along the Mekong River in northern Lao PDR. Vientiane: The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Lao PDR Country Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L, Sinh, BT, Garden, P, Bui, VH, Subsin, N, Le, AT, Nguyen, TPVV (2013) Risk reduction or redistribution? Flood management in the Mekong region. ResearchGate, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, M. R. (1999). Water and conflict in the Middle East and south Asia: Are environmetnal issues and security issues linked? Journal of Environment and Development, 8(4), 376–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Nagle, R, Howard, E, Wiltse, A Duncan, D (2011). Conference Synopsis: Bonn2011 Conference: the Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus: Solutions for the Green Economy, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and OOSKAnews, Inc., Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, N. (2012). Water grabbing in the Mekong Basin: An analysis of the winners and losers of Thailand’s hydropower development in Lao PDR. Water Alternatives, 5(2), 392–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehtonen, K., Keskinen, M., & Varis, O. (2008). The Mekong: Iwrm and institutions. In O. Varis, A. K. Biswas, & C. Tortajada (Eds.), Management of transboundary rivers and lakes. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekong River Commission (1995). Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong River basin. Chiang Rai, Thailand: Mekong River Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. A., & Douglass, M. (2015). Governing flooding in Asia’s urban transition. Pacific Affairs, 88(3), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, H (2007). In Feist, S. (Ed.), Hoffnung Auf Das Kleine Korn: in Den Philippinen Waechst Der Reis Der Zukunft (Hope for the little corn: The Philipines grow rice for the future. Weltmacht Wasser (Worldpower Water), Munich, Germany: Herbig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neo, L. (2012). Climate change impacts, vulnerabilities and adaptation measures in the lower Mekong Basin. Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management, 4(4), 355–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, E. (2012). Preliminary analysis of water security in the Mekong River basin, UNU-CRIS working papers 12. Brugge: United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radio Free Asia (2013). Laos confirms ‘preparatory’ work on controversial dam project. Radio Free Asia, viewed 10 August 2013, http://www.rfa.org/english/news/laos/confirms-07312013151754.html.

  • Roberts, TR (2001). Downstream ecological implications of China’s Lancang hydropower and Mekong navigation project. Paper delivered at the International Symposium on Biodiversity Management and Sustainable Development in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin, Xishuangbanna, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, A., & Li, D. (2012). Strenghtening climate adaptation in the lower Mekong River basin through a regional adaption action network. Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management, 4(4), 527–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidiger, R., & Sierotzki, K. (2015). Xayaburi hydroelectric power project. Vientiane: Pöry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K (2011). Water challenges Asia’s rising powers—part I. Yale Global Online, viewed 29 April 2016, http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/water-challenges-asia-powers-part-i .

  • Schultz, B., & Uhlenbrook, S. (2007). Water security: What does it mean, what may it imply?’, discussion draft paper for session on water security. Delft: UNESCO-IHE (Institute for Water Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Southeast Asia River Network. (2004). Downstream impacts of hydropower and development of an interantional river: A case study of Lancang-Mekong. Chiang Mai: Southeast Asia River Network (SEARIN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on Transboundary Waters. (2008). Transboundary waters: Sharing benefits, sharing responsibilitites. Zaragoza: UN-Water Thematic Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannarith, C. (2012). ‘A Cambodian perspective on Mekong River water security’, blog post. Phnom Penh: Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace (CICP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varchol, D (2012). The Mekong [film].

    Google Scholar 

  • Viet Nam News (2015). Mekong faces water shortage. Viet Nam News, 9 October 2015. http://vietnamnews.vn/society/276846/mekong-faces-water-shortage.html.

  • Wolf, A. T. (1998). Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy, 1(2), 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Haefner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haefner, A. (2018). Environmental Disasters in the Mekong Subregion: Looking Beyond State Boundaries. In: Miller, M., Douglass, M., Garschagen, M. (eds) Crossing Borders. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6126-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics