Advertisement

China-Based Air Pollution and Epistemic Community Building in the Northeast Asian Region

Chapter

Abstract

New technologies are driven principally by need, and paramount among such needs are those which are framed by environmental disasters. In Northeast Asia, trade winds blow west to east, so anything airborne in China remains airborne in some fashion in Korea, Japan, parts of Russia, and beyond. Thus, the increase of Chinese air pollution as well as the yellow sand/dust which exacerbates the transfer of pollutants is both a domestic and international concern. This paper assesses the effects of the East Asian Acid Deposition Monitoring Network (EANET) to mitigate pollution blowing out of mainland China, focusing especially on the creation and fostering of an epistemic community of scientists and engineers. All of the affected countries are high-technology producers, and the cross-national connections which are fostered through R&D efforts are a crucial complement to multilateral agreements such as EANET. The primary research questions to be considered, thus, are as follows: How are scientists and researchers across the region constrained in their efforts to address the increasingly devastating effects of China-based air pollution? To what extent are domestic political factors thwarting efforts to establish an epistemic community? At the same time, and to provide a truly complete picture of international R&D beyond scientist and researcher connections, what policies – in China, in neighboring countries, and across countries in the region – will incentivize R&D to address China-based air pollution? This study employs a mixed methods approach to answer these questions, integrating patent data, publication data, and interview-based data which draws upon the experiences of scientists and researchers, a group that has typically been considered tangential to institutions of international relations related to the environment.

Keywords

Transboundary pollution EANET Environmental disaster technologies China Cross-border disaster governance 

References

  1. Abbott, K. W. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, K.W., Green, J.F., Keohane, R.O. (2013). Organisational ecology and organisational strategies in world politics. The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Discussion Paper 13–57.Google Scholar
  3. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ai, N., & Polenske, K. R. (2008). Socioeconomic impact analysis of yellow-dust storms: An approach and case study for Beijing. Economic Systems Research, 20(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BBC News. (2015). China incinerator plan cancelled after protests. BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-Asia-China-32229589.
  6. Brettell, A. (2007). Security, energy, and the environment: The atmospheric link. In I.-T. Hyun & M. A. Schreurs (Eds.), The environmental dimension of Asian security: Conflict and cooperation over energy, resources, and pollution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  7. Brettell, A., & Kawashima, Y. (1998). Sino-Japanese relations on acid rain. In M. A. Schreurs & D. Pirages (Eds.), Ecological security in Northeast Asia. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Backstrand, K., Betsill, M. M., Compagnon, D., Duffy, R., Kolk, A., Hoffman, M., Levy, D., Newell, P., Milledge, T., Paterson, M., Pattberg, P., & VanDeveer, S. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: Assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., & Montresor, S. (2012). Environmental innovations, local networks and internationalization. Industry and Innovation, 19(8), 697–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, C., & Shao, L. (2007). Report on the environmental satisfaction in Xiacheng District of Hangzhou City [in Chinese]. Zhejiang Statistics, 14(10), 46–68.Google Scholar
  11. EANET. (2010). About acid deposition monitoring network in East Asia. Viewed 29 Apr 2016, http://www.eanet.asia/eanet/brief.html.
  12. EANET. (2011). Acid deposition monitoring network in East Asia. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016, http://www.eanet.asia/product/EANET_Brochure.pdf.
  13. EANET. (2015). Review on the state of air pollution in East Asia. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016, http://www.eanet.asia/product/RSAP/RSAP.pdf.
  14. Fankhauser, S., Bowen, A., Calel, R., Dechezleprêtre, A., Grover, D., Rydge, J., & Sato, M. (2013). Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 902–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer, E. V., Hsu, N. C., Jaffe, D. A., Jeong, M.-J., & Gong, S. L. (2009). A decade of dust: Asian dust and springtime aerosol load in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frantzen, D. (2002). Intersectoral and international R&D knowledge spillovers and total factor productivity. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49(3), 280–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardiner, B. (2014). Air of revolution: How activists and social media scrutinize city pollution. The Guardian, 31 Jan. http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/jan/31/air-activists-social-media-pollution-city.
  18. Ge, B.-Z., Liu, Y., Chen, H.-S., Pan, X.-L., & Wang, Z.-F. (2015). Spatial source contributions identification of acid rain over the Yangtze River delta using a variety of methods. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 8(6), 397–402.Google Scholar
  19. GNNCSDS [Global Network of National Councils for Sustainable Development and Similar Bodies]. (n.d.). Korea: Presidential Committee on GreenGrowth (PCGG). Viewed 29 Apr 2016, http://www.ncsds.org/index.php/sustainable-development-councils/86-country-profiles/profiles/155-korea.
  20. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  21. Guo, Z., Ai, N., & Polenske, K. R. (2008). Evaluating environmental and economic benefits. The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 15(5), 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haas, P. M. (1990). Obtaining international environmental protection through epistemic consensus. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(3), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haggard, S. (2013). The organisational architecture of the Asia-Pacific: Insights from the new institutionalism. In M. Kahler & A. MacIntyre (Eds.), Integrating regions: Asia in comparative context. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. In A. B. Jaffe & M. Trajtenberg (Eds.), Patents, citations and innovations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Han, L., Cheng, S., Zhuang, G., Ning, H., Wang, H., Wei, W., & Zhao, X. (2015). The changes and long-range transport of PM2.5 in Beijing in the past decade. Atmospheric Environment, 110, 186–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helpman, E. (1993). Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica, 61(6), 1247–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang, L., Yan, L., & Wu, J. (2016). Assessing urban sustainability of Chinese megacities: 35 years after the economic reform and open-door policy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 145, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jeong, D.-Y. (2008). Socio-economic costs from yellow dust damages in South Korea. Korean Social Science Journal, 35(2), 1–29.Google Scholar
  29. Kelley, J. G. (2013). The potential for organisational membership rules to enhance regional cooperation? In M. Kahler & A. MacIntyre (Eds.), Integrating regions: Asia in comparative context. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, L. (1999). Learning and innovation in economic development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Kim, I. (2007). Environmental cooperation of Northeast Asia: Transboundary air pollution. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, S. (2014) South Korea’s climate change diplomacy: Analysis based on the perspective of “middle power diplomacy”, EAI MPDI Working Paper, no. 5. pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
  34. Komori, Y. (2010). Evaluating regional environmental governance in Northeast Asia. Asian Affairs, 37(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kostka, G. (2015). Command without control: The case of China’s environmental target system. Regulation & Governance, Early View, 10(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kostka, G., & Mol, A. P. J. (2013). Implementation and participation in China’s local environmental politics: Challenges and innovations. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, S. (2001). Environmental regime-building in Northeast Asia: A catalyst for sustainable regional cooperation. Journal of East Asian Studies, 1(2), 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, S. (2002). Building environmental regimes in Northeast Asia: Progress, limitations, and policy options. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), International environmental cooperation: Politics and diplomacy in Pacific Asia. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
  39. Li, J., Yang, W., Wang, Z., Chen, H., Hu, B., Li, J., Sun, Y., & Huang, Y. (2014). A modeling study of source-receptor relationships in atmospheric particulate matter over Northeast Asia. Atmospheric Environment, 91, 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lin, J., Pan, D., Davis, S. J., Zhang, Q., He, K., Wang, C., Streets, D. G., Wuebbles, D. J., & Guan, D. (2014). China’s international trade and air pollution in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(5), 1736–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lo, K. (2015). How authoritarian is the environmental governance of China? Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McHale, M. R., Pickett, S. T. A., Barbosa, O., Bunn, D. N., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., Gartin, M., Hess, G. R., Iwaniec, D., McPhearson, T., Peterson, N., Poole, A., Rivers, L., III, Shutters, S. T., & Zhou, W. (2015). The new global urban realm: Complex, connected, diffuse, and diverse social-ecological systems. Sustainability, 7(5), 5211–5240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meng, J., Liu, J., Xu, Y., & Tao, S. (2015). Tracing primary PM2.5 emissions via Chinese supply chains. Environmental Research Letters, 10(5), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mol, A. P. J. (2009). Urban environmental governance innovations in China. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nam, S. (2002). Ecological interdependence and environmental governance in Northeast Asia: Politics vs. cooperation. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), International environmental cooperation: Politics and diplomacy in Pacific Asia. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
  46. Park, J. (2004). International and intersectoral R&D spillovers in the OECD and East Asian economies. Economic Inquiry, 42(4), 739–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Park, S.-U., Choe, A., Lee, E.-H., Park, M.-S., & Song, X. (2010). The Asian Dust Aerosol Model 2 (ADAM2) with the use of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) obtained from the Spot4/vegetation data. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 101(1), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2008). Fostering environment-efficiency through transnational linkages? Trajectories of CO2 and SO2, 1980–2000. Environment and Planning A, 40(12), 2970–2989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ravetti, C., Jin, Y., Quan, M., Shiqiu, Z., & Swanson, T. (2014). A dragon eating its own tail: Public information about pollution in China. Center for International Environmental Studies, Research Paper, 27, 1–41.Google Scholar
  50. Roberts, D. (2015) Opinion: How the U.S. embassy tweeted to clear Beijing’s air, Wired, 6 Mar. http://www.wired.com/2015/03/opinion-us-embassy-beijing-tweeted-clear-air/.
  51. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shapiro, M. A. (2012). Environmental legislation in East Asia: Rationale and significance. In Z. Zhu (Ed.), New dynamics in east Asian politics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  54. Shapiro, M.A. (2014a) International collaboration and green technology generation: Assessing the East Asian environmental regime. EAI Fellows Program Working Paper Series No. 46, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  55. Shapiro, M. A. (2014b). Regionalism’s challenge to the pollution haven hypothesis: A study of Northeast Asia and China. The Pacific Review, 27(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shapiro, M. A., & Gottschall, K. (2011). Northeast Asian environmentalism: Policies as a function of ENGOs. Asian Politics and Policy, 3(4), 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shapiro, M. A., & Nugent, J. B. (2012). Institutions and the sources of innovation: The determinants and effects of international R&D collaboration. International Journal of Public Policy, 8(4–6), 230–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sohn, I. (2012). Toward normative fragmentation: An East Asian financial architecture in the post-global crisis world. Review of International Political Economy, 19(4), 586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stoerk, T. (2015) Statistical corruption in Beijing’s air quality data has likely ended in 2012. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, Working Paper No. 194.Google Scholar
  60. Sun, Y., Zhuang, G., Huang, K., Li, J., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Lin, Y., Fu, J. S., Zhang, W., Tang, A., & Zhao, X. (2010). Asian dust over northern China and its impact on the downstream aerosol chemistry in 2004. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 115(D7), 1–16.Google Scholar
  61. Thomson-Reuters. (2015) Web of science. Viewed 10 Oct 2015, http://wokinfo.com/.
  62. Tsai, F., Tu, J.-Y., Hsu, S.-C., & Chen, W.-N. (2014). Case study of the Asian dust and pollutant event in spring 2006: Source, transport, and contribution to Taiwan. Science of the Total Evironment, 478, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tsunekawa, K. (2005). Why so many maps there? Japan and regional cooperation. In T. J. Pempel (Ed.), Remapping East Asia: The construction of a region. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Urpelainen, J. (2011). Technology investment, bargaining, and international environmental agreements. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 12(2), 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. USPTO. (2009). Environmentally Sound Technologies (EST) concordance. Viewed 29 Apr 2016, http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/international/est_concordance.htm.
  66. USPTO. (2015). United States Patent and Trademark Office Database. Viewed 10 Oct 2015, http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-adv.htm.
  67. Victor, D. G. (2011). Global warming gridlock. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wagner, C.S., Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L. (2014) Recent developments in China-US cooperation in science. Paper presented to the Conference on China’s International S&T Relations, Arizona State University, April.Google Scholar
  69. Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PloS One, 10(7), e0131816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. World Bank. (2015). World development indicators, 2015. Washginton, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wu, J., Xiang, W.-N., & Zhao, J. (2014). Urban ecology in China: Historical developments and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yoo, I.T., & Kim, I. (2015). Free trade agreements for the environment? Regional economic integration and environmental cooperation in East Asia. In International environmental agreements: Politics, law and economics (pp. 1–18).Google Scholar
  73. Yoshimatsu, H. (2014). Comparing institution-building in East Asia: Power politics, governance, and critical junctures. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Young, O. R. (1990). Global environmental change and international governance. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(3), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhao, S., & Yang, B. (2007). A survey and analysis on the environment awareness of Lanzhou citizen [in Chinese]. Journal of BUPT (Social Sciences Edition), 9(5), 14–18.Google Scholar
  76. Zheng, S., & Kahn, M. E. (2013). Understanding China’s urban pollution dynamics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(3), 731–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zheng, S., Sun, C., Qi, Y., & Kahn, M. E. (2014). The evolving geography of China’s industrial production: Implications for pollution dynamics and urban quality of life. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(4), 709–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zi, F., Yang, Z., Zhang, F., Tian, H., Wang, G., Wu, J., Liu, Y., Fang, G., Xiang, J., & Fang, R. (2012). Report of environment satisfaction and life satisfaction in ten cities in China [in Chinese]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 11(4), 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations