Advertisement

Is India on the Path to Replacement Fertility Soon? Exploring the Role of Rural–Urban Differential Pace and Timing of Fertility Decline

  • Tapan Kumar ChakrabartyEmail author
  • Mallika Deb
Chapter
  • 420 Downloads
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

India is on the track to become the world’s most populous country in about a decade, even though there is more than 50% decline in its fertility rate since 1950 to 2.3 children per woman in 2013. In spite of a huge accelerated fertility decline, it has still been passing through the third phase of demographic transition, and yet to reach the replacement level of fertility for population stabilization. In this article, we analyse the role of rural–urban differential pace and timing of fertility decline in India for achieving the target of replacement. We use time series data on total fertility rate from sample registration system provided by the Office of The Registrar General, India to answer a set of the following questions. (i) Is the nation’s fertility transition is typical of its rural part or has it proceeded at a different pace of decline? (ii) To what extent the transition characteristics, e.g. pace and timing are different in rural and urban parts of the nation? Do we identify distinct rural–urban trajectories? (iii) Do these differentials play a significant role in taking the nation towards fourth stage of demographic transition from the third stage? We have used the method of change point analysis to identify the significant change points associated with total fertility rates of rural, urban and the entire country as a whole during 1971–2013. Finally, using a class of ARIMA, models forecasts are obtained and the implications of the results are discussed.

Keywords

Total fertility rate Random walk Bootstrap sampling ARIMA processes Change point analysis Unit root tests 

References

  1. Arokiasamy, P., & Goli, S. (2012). Fertility convergence in the Indian states: An assessment of changes in averages and inequalities in fertility. GENUS LXVII (1), 65–88.Google Scholar
  2. Bhat, P. N., Preston, S. H. T., & Dyson, T. (1984). Vital rates in India, 1961–81. Committee on population and demography, Report No. 24. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Box, G. E. P., &Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. Chakrabarty, T. K. (2014). Forecasting rate of decline in infant mortality in South Asia using random walk approximation. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 3(3), 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haub, C., & Gribble, J. (2011). The world at 7 billion. Population Bulletin 66(2), Washington.Google Scholar
  7. Hinkley, D., & Schechtman, E. (1987). Conditional bootstrap methods in the mean-shift model. Biometrika, 74(1), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. MacKinnon, J. G. (1991). Critical values for cointegration tests. In R. F. Engle, C. W. J. Granger (Eds.), Long-run economic relationships: Reading in cointegration (pp. 267–276). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. (2011). Census of India, 2011, provisional population totals. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.Google Scholar
  10. Rele, J. R. (1987). Fertility levels and trends in India, 1951–81. Population and Development Review, 1393, 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. RGI (Registrar General of India). (2014). Sample Registration System annual report 49, New Delhi. Office of the Registrar General. http://censusindia.gov.in.
  12. Taylor, W. (2000a). Change-point analysis: A powerful new tool for detecting changes. http://www.variation.com/cpa/tech/changepoint.html.
  13. Taylor, W. (2000b). Change-point analyzer 2.0 shareware program. Illinois: Taylor Enterprises, Libertyville. http://www.variation.com/cpa.
  14. Taylor, W. (2000c). A pattern test for distinguishing between autoregressive and mean-shift data. Submitted to Journal of Quality Technologies.Google Scholar
  15. United Nations. (2011). The Millennium development goals report 2011. New York: The United Nations.Google Scholar
  16. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2015). World Population Prospects: 2015 Revision, DVD Edition.Google Scholar
  17. World Bank. (2011). World development indicators 2011, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsNorth-Eastern Hill UniversityShillong, MeghalayaIndia

Personalised recommendations