Advertisement

Norway’s High North Policies

  • Geir HønnelandEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The High North is the number one priority in Norwegian foreign politics. The country’s High North strategies have traditionally centred on its relationship with other states in the Barents Sea area, Russia in particular. During the Cold War, security interests dominated, while after the dissolution of the Soviet Union institutionalized cooperation with Russia became the hallmark of Norwegian High North politics. From the mid-2000s, the division between foreign and domestic policies gradually dissolved, while more recently the circumpolar dimension has grown in importance. Balancing the domestic, regional, and circumpolar levels is a challenge in Norwegian High North politics, but this also gives an opportunity to cultivate different dimensions of these policies depending on the international political situation.

Keywords

Norwegian Arctic politics Norwegian High North politics Barents region 

References

  1. Åtland, Kristian. 2008. Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk Initiative, and the Desecuritization of Interstate Relations in the Arctic. Cooperation and Conflict 43: 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgerson, Scott S. 2008. Arctic Meltdown: The Economic and Security Implications of Global Warming. Foreign Affairs 87: 63–77.Google Scholar
  3. Browning, Christopher S. 2010. The Region-Building Approach Revisited: The Continued Othering of Russia in Discourses of Region-Building in the European North. Geopolitics 8: 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hønneland, Geir. 1998a. Compliance in the Fishery Protection Zone around Svalbard. Ocean Development and International Law 29: 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hønneland, Geir. 1998b. Identity Formation in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region. Cooperation and Conflict 33: 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hønneland, Geir. 2003. Russia and the West: Environmental Co-operation and Conflict. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hønneland, Geir. 2005. Barentsbrytninger: norsk nordområdepolitikk etter den kalde krigen [Barents Refractions: Norwegian High North Politics after the End of the Cold War]. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.Google Scholar
  8. Hønneland, Geir. 2006. Kvotekamp og kyststatssolidaritet: norsk-russisk fiskeriforvaltning gjennom 30 år [Quota Battles and Coastal State Solidarity: Norwegian–Russian Fisheries Management through 30 Years]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  9. Hønneland, Geir. 2012. Making Fishery Agreements Work: Post-Agreement Bargaining in the Barents Sea. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hønneland, Geir. 2014a. Norway’s High Arctic Policy. In International Relations and the Arctic: Understanding Policy and Governance, edited by Robert W. Murray and Anita Dey Nuttall. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hønneland, Geir. 2014b. From ‘the Age of the Arctic’ to ‘the Scramble for the Arctic’. In Research Collection on the Politics of the Arctic, edited by Geir Hønneland. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Hønneland, Geir. 2017. Norway and the High North: Foreign Policy Strategies Since the Cold War. Current Politics and Economics of Europe 28: 31–54.Google Scholar
  13. Hønneland, Geir, and Lars Rowe. 2004. Health as International Politics: Combating Communicable Diseases in the Baltic Sea Region. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Hønneland, Geir, and Lars Rowe. 2005. Western vs. Post-Soviet Medicine: Fighting Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS in North-West Russia and the Baltic States. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 21: 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hønneland, Geir, and Lars Rowe. 2010. Nordområdene – hva nå? [The High North: What Now?]. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  16. Hønneland, Geir, and Leif Christian Jensen. 2008. Den nye nordområdepolitikken [The New Politics on the High North]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, Leif Christian, and Geir Hønneland. 2011. Framing the High North: Public Discourses in Norway after 2000. Acta Borealia 28: 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen, Øystein. 2010. Towards Setting the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf in the Arctic: On the Norwegian Submission and Recommendations of the Commission. In Law, Technology and Science for Oceans in Globalisation: IUU Fishing, Oil Pollution, Bioprospecting, Outer Continental Shelf, edited by Davor Vidas. Leiden and Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  19. Molenaar, Erik Jaap. 2012. Fisheries Regulation in the Maritime Zones of Svalbard. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 27: 3–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pedersen, Torbjørn. 2008. The Constrained Politics of the Svalbard Offshore Area. Marine Policy 32: 913–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pedersen, Torbjørn. 2009a. Norway’s Rule on Svalbard: Tightening the Grip on the Arctic Islands. Polar Record 45: 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pedersen, Torbjørn. 2009b. Denmark’s Policies toward the Svalbard Area. Ocean Development and International Law 40: 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pedersen, Torbjørn. 2011. International Law and Politics in U.S. Policymaking: The United States and the Svalbard Dispute. Ocean Development and International Law 42: 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothwell, Donald. 2008. The Arctic in International Affairs: Time for a New Regime? Brown Journal of World Affairs 15: 241–253.Google Scholar
  25. Rowe, Lars, Jørgen Holten Jørgensen, and Geir Hønneland. 2015. Vårt bilde av Russland [Our Image of Russia]. Bergen: John Grieg.Google Scholar
  26. Scrivener, David. 1999. Arctic Cooperation in Transition. Polar Record 35: 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stokke, Olav Schram, and Geir Hønneland (eds.). 2007. International Cooperation and Arctic Governance: Regime Effectiveness and Northern Region Building. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Stokke, Olav Schram, and Ola Tunander (eds.). 1994. The Barents Region: Cooperation in Arctic Europe. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Ulfstein, Geir. 1995. The Svalbard Treaty: From Terra Nullius to Norwegian Sovereignty. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Vylegzhanin, A.N., and V.K. Zilanov. 2007. Spitsbergen: Legal Regime of Adjacent Marine Areas. Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Young, Oran R. 1985. The Age of the Arctic. Foreign Policy 61: 160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fridtjof Nansen InstituteOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations