Skip to main content

Chelant-Enhanced Phytoextraction of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils and Its Environmental Risk Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The in situ phytoremediation, using plants to restore the deteriorated soils, is a promising technology in cleanup of polluted sites. The potential use of high-biomass plants was investigated for the EDTA or EDDS-enhanced phytoextraction of metals from contaminated soils. The approaches for enhancing the efficiency of chelant-assisted phytoextraction and the environmental risk (metals leaching) of applying EDTA and EDDS were also investigated. The results showed that, compared to the monocotyledon species (e.g., barley, wheat, sorghum, corn, vetiver grass, etc.), the dicotyledon species (i.e., mung bean, buckwheat, pea, sunflower oil, mustard, etc.) had a higher sensitivity to the EDTA or EDDS treatments, which could be reflected by the severer toxicity of seedlings and the higher concentrations of heavy metals in the shoots. Considering the three factors (the metal level of the shoot, the biomass of plants, and the growing seasons of plants), mustard and pea were more suitably used in the cool seasons, while corn, sunflower, mung bean, and buckwheat could be selected in the warm seasons. Vetiver grass might be suitably used in the phytostabilization of heavy metals in soils. There was a new approach that the increase of soil temperature could improve the efficiency of heavy metal accumulation of plants from soils by 10–40 times in comparison with the normal chelator application. This was the highest efficiency of chelator application reported in the literature up to now. Soil column leaching tests and a field study were carried out to investigate the leaching behavior of heavy metals in chelant-enhanced phytoextraction. Results showed that the soluble heavy metals in the contaminated soils after EDTA application could be persistent in the soils for a long time (at least 32 weeks), which could be easily leached down to the deep soils under the large rainfall percolation. On the contrary, EDDS application had a little effect on the movement of heavy metals in the soils. The results showed that the potential leaching associated with EDDS addition may be controlled under field conditions. The use of biodegradable chelators for enhancing phytoextraction of heavy metal-contaminated soils is generally regarded as an environmentally acceptable approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Chen YH, Li XD, Shen ZG (2004a) Leaching and uptake of heavy metals by ten different species of plants during an EDTA-assisted phytoextraction process. Chemosphere 57(3):187–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Shen ZG, Li XD (2004b) The use of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) in the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Appl Geochem 19(10):1553–1565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Liu L, Wang G et al (2007a) The leaching behavior of heavy metals in contaminated soils during the process of chelant-enhanced phytoremediation. J Nanjing Agric Univ 30(4):46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Mao Y, He SB et al (2007b) Heat stress increases the efficiency of EDTA in phytoextraction of heavy metals. Chemosphere 67(8):1511–1517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Wang CC, Wang GP et al (2008) Heating treatment schemes for enhancing chelant-assisted phytoextraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:888–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworska JS, Schowanek D, Feijtel TCJ (1999) Environmental risk assessment for trisodium [S, S]-ethylene diamine disuccinate, a biodegradable chelator used in detergent applications. Chemosphere 38(15):3597–3625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meers E, Ruttens A, Hopgood MJ et al (2005) Comparison of EDTA and EDDS as potential soil amendments for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals. Chemosphere 58(8):1011–1022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meers E, Tack FMG, Verloo MG (2008) Degradability of ethylenediamine disuccinic acid (EDDS) in metal contaminated soils: implications for its use soil remediation. Chemosphere 70(3):358–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neugschwandtner RW, Tlustoš P, Komárek M et al (2008) Phytoextraction of Pb and Cd from a contaminated agricultural soil using different EDTA application regimes: laboratory versus field scale measures of efficiency. Geoderma 144(3):446–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I (1998) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 49(1):643–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandevivere PC, Saveyn H, Verstraete W et al (2001) Biodegradation of metal-[S, S]-EDDS complexes. Environ Sci Technol 35(9):1765–1770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang A, Luo C, Yang R et al (2012) Metal leaching along soil profiles after the EDDS application – a field study. Environ Pollut 164:204–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Liu Y, Xia Y et al (2011) Copper contamination of soils and vegetables in the vicinity of Jiuhuashan copper mine, China. Environ Earth Sci 64(3):761–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yahua Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Science Press & Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chen, Y., Li, X., Shen, Z. (2018). Chelant-Enhanced Phytoextraction of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils and Its Environmental Risk Assessment. In: Luo, Y., Tu, C. (eds) Twenty Years of Research and Development on Soil Pollution and Remediation in China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6029-8_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics