Abstract
This chapter studies the differences in active ageing across cohorts and countries in Europe. This is done with the replication of the Active Ageing Index for cohorts formed by age group, sex and country for 2012. The analysis is performed with different model regressions at the cohort level and introducing macro variables at the country level. In general, there is a gap in active ageing in detriment of females which is larger in older cohorts. Further, wealth, equity and pension settings of the country are important predictors for better active ageing. Finally, in line with the original AAI results, it is found that the Social-Democratic welfare regime (Nordic countries), with its set of strong redistributive policies, is the most favourable setting for active ageing.
Notes
- 1.
It will become more evident in the empirical section, but it can be said that these differences are taken into account when linear regressions are performed for a sample where the unit of analysis is the cohort as defined above.
- 2.
- 3.
This is the very last available revision of EU-SILC-2012 (01 Aug 2014) at the time of production of this study.
- 4.
The average values in each domain (employment, participation, independent and capacity) of the official and simulated AAI are (0.279; 0.181; 0.706; 0.544) and (0.231; 0.176; 0.652; 0.542), respectively.
- 5.
This result is perhaps driven by the indicator 3.2 of Table 13.1, which measures the proportion of individuals living in single or couple households. It is much more common to observe older individuals living in these types of households. In fact, it is also more likely that those who struggle with independent living are more likely to move into residential care. In any case, it must be noted that people living in residential care homes are not included in the sample of the EQLS.
- 6.
The log of pension per capita is dropped from model 6 because this presents the largest contribution to the overall multicollinearity measured with the Variable Inflation Factor (VIF). The VIF of that variable is 15.74.
References
Fenger, M. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2), 1–30.
Kammer, A., Niehues, J., & Peichl, A. (2012). Welfare regimes and welfare state outcomes in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 455–471.
Lancee, B., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2012). Income inequality and participation. A comparison of 24 European countries. Social Science Research, 41(5), 1166–1178.
Marx, I., Nolan, B., & Olivera, J. (2015). The welfare state and anti-poverty policy in rich countries. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Sapir, A. (2006). Globalization and the reform of European social models. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 369–390.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing—A policy framework, a contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing. Madrid, Spain, April 2002.
Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M. M., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., Schmidt, A., Vanhuysse, P., & Zolyomi, E. (2013). Active Ageing Index 2012. Concept, methodology, and final results. Research Memorandum/Methodology Report. European Centre Vienna, March 2013. Retrieved from www.euro.centre.org/data/aai/1253897823_70974.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olivera, J. (2018). A Cross-country and Cohort Analysis of Active Ageing Differences Among the Elderly in Europe. In: Zaidi, A., Harper, S., Howse, K., Lamura, G., Perek-Białas, J. (eds) Building Evidence for Active Ageing Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6017-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6017-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6016-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6017-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)