Skip to main content

A Cross-country and Cohort Analysis of Active Ageing Differences Among the Elderly in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Building Evidence for Active Ageing Policies

Abstract

This chapter studies the differences in active ageing across cohorts and countries in Europe. This is done with the replication of the Active Ageing Index for cohorts formed by age group, sex and country for 2012. The analysis is performed with different model regressions at the cohort level and introducing macro variables at the country level. In general, there is a gap in active ageing in detriment of females which is larger in older cohorts. Further, wealth, equity and pension settings of the country are important predictors for better active ageing. Finally, in line with the original AAI results, it is found that the Social-Democratic welfare regime (Nordic countries), with its set of strong redistributive policies, is the most favourable setting for active ageing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It will become more evident in the empirical section, but it can be said that these differences are taken into account when linear regressions are performed for a sample where the unit of analysis is the cohort as defined above.

  2. 2.

    See http://www1.unece.org/stat/platform/display/AAI/V.+Methodology

  3. 3.

    This is the very last available revision of EU-SILC-2012 (01 Aug 2014) at the time of production of this study.

  4. 4.

    The average values in each domain (employment, participation, independent and capacity) of the official and simulated AAI are (0.279; 0.181; 0.706; 0.544) and (0.231; 0.176; 0.652; 0.542), respectively.

  5. 5.

    This result is perhaps driven by the indicator 3.2 of Table 13.1, which measures the proportion of individuals living in single or couple households. It is much more common to observe older individuals living in these types of households. In fact, it is also more likely that those who struggle with independent living are more likely to move into residential care. In any case, it must be noted that people living in residential care homes are not included in the sample of the EQLS.

  6. 6.

    The log of pension per capita is dropped from model 6 because this presents the largest contribution to the overall multicollinearity measured with the Variable Inflation Factor (VIF). The VIF of that variable is 15.74.

References

  • Fenger, M. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammer, A., Niehues, J., & Peichl, A. (2012). Welfare regimes and welfare state outcomes in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancee, B., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2012). Income inequality and participation. A comparison of 24 European countries. Social Science Research, 41(5), 1166–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, I., Nolan, B., & Olivera, J. (2015). The welfare state and anti-poverty policy in rich countries. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A. (2006). Globalization and the reform of European social models. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 369–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing—A policy framework, a contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing. Madrid, Spain, April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M. M., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., Schmidt, A., Vanhuysse, P., & Zolyomi, E. (2013). Active Ageing Index 2012. Concept, methodology, and final results. Research Memorandum/Methodology Report. European Centre Vienna, March 2013. Retrieved from www.euro.centre.org/data/aai/1253897823_70974.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 13.10 The Active Ageing Index by domain and sex
Table 13.11 The Active Ageing Index by age group and sex
Table 13.12 Macro variables in EU-28 countries (2012)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Olivera, J. (2018). A Cross-country and Cohort Analysis of Active Ageing Differences Among the Elderly in Europe. In: Zaidi, A., Harper, S., Howse, K., Lamura, G., Perek-Białas, J. (eds) Building Evidence for Active Ageing Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6017-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6017-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6016-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6017-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics