Changes in Work Patterns of Rural Women in the Context of Structural Transformation in India

Chapter

Abstract

The rural labour market in India is witnessing a structural transformation, with an evident shift from farm work to non-farm work. However, there are limited job options for rural women apart from agricultural work. Therefore, it becomes important to examine the change in work patterns for rural women when non-farm work opportunities like Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act are available. This chapter tries to answer questions on rural women’s work participation utilizing two rounds of the India Human Development Survey (IHDS) panel data (2005–2012), on what are the changing patterns of work among rural women in the context of structural transformation, what determines their choice of one job over the other? What are the socio-economic determinants of how much labour is supplied in farm work by rural women? Has amount of labour days supplied in farm activities reduced for females as compared to men? The study reveals that, in rural areas, shifting out of agriculture is mainly for males with non-farm jobs having entry barrier. There is a preference for regular-salaried jobs with the rise in the income and education standards among the rural women. Days of work on farm have not declined much for rural women as compared to rural men, except for, those rural women with higher level of education and those at higher income quintiles. With limited job opportunities, agriculture still remains a main job option of women. MGNREGA mainly emerges as an alternative job option for the marginalized rural women who are poor, illiterate and from the backward classes. MGNREGA is mainly combined with farm work, probably during the lean agricultural season and has a poverty reducing potential for the rural households by providing employment for few days in a year yet significant in augmenting household income.

References

  1. Abraham V (2009) Rural employment growth in India: distress driven? Econ Pol Weekly 44(16):97–104Google Scholar
  2. Bhalotra S, Umana-Aponte M (2010) The dynamics of women’s labour supply in developing countries. Discussion Paper No. 4879, IZAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardhan PK (1979) Labor supply functions in a poor agrarian economy. Am Econ Rev 69(1):73–83Google Scholar
  4. Chand R, Srivastava SK (2014) Changes in the rural labour market and their implications for agriculture. Econ Pol Weekly 59(10):47–54Google Scholar
  5. Chari A (2006) Guaranteed employment and gender construction: Women’s mobilisation in Maharashtra. Econ Pol Weekly 51(50):41–48Google Scholar
  6. Chaudhary R, Verick S (2014) Women labour force participation in India and beyond. ILO Asia—Pacific Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manage Rev 10:76–88Google Scholar
  8. Garikipati S, Pfaffenzeller S (2010) The gendered burden of liberalisation: the impact of India’s economic reforms on its women agricultural labour. J Int Dev 24(7):841–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dasgupta Goldar (2005) Women labour supply in rural India: An econometric analysis. Delhi University Enclave, New Delhi, Institute of Economic GrowthGoogle Scholar
  10. Eberharter VV (2003) Structural features of women employment status and earnings mobility: the experience in Germany. Rev Soc Econ 61(4):511–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher T, Mahajan V and Singha A (1997) The Forgotten Sector. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, p 274Google Scholar
  12. Grown C (2006) Quick impact initiatives for gender inequality—a menu of option (Working Paper No. 462). Bard College, Levy Economics Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Himanshu (2016) A Union budget for the village, Indian Express, 27th FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  14. Jatav M, Sen S (2013) Drivers of non-farm employment in rural India: evidence from the 2009–10 NSSO round. Econ Pol Weekly 57(26):14–21Google Scholar
  15. Kahn RL, Wolfe DM, Quinn RP, Snoek JD (1964) Organizational stress: studies in role of work-family conflict. Pers Rev 30:502–522Google Scholar
  16. Kak S (1994) Rural women and labour force participation. Soc Sci 22(3/4):35–59Google Scholar
  17. Khera R, Nayak N (2009) Women workers and perceptions of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. Econ Pol Weekly 54(43):49–57Google Scholar
  18. Kumar A, Kumar S, Singh DK (2011) Rural employment diversification in India: trends, determinants and implication on poverty. Ag Eco Research Review 24:361–372Google Scholar
  19. Lobel SA (1991) Allocation of investment in work and family roles: alternative theories and implications for research. Acad Manage Rev 16(3):507–521Google Scholar
  20. Mizala A, Romaguera P, Henríquez P (1999) Women labor supply in Chile. University of Chile, Santiago, ChileGoogle Scholar
  21. Pellissery S, Jalan SK (2011) Towards transformative social protection: a gendered analysis of the Employment Guarantee Act of India (MGNREGA). Gender Dev 19(2):283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reddy DN, Reddy AA, Nagaraj N, Bantilan C (2014) Rural non-farm employment and rural transformation in india. Working Paper Series Number 57Google Scholar
  23. Unni J (1996) Occupational choice and multiple job holding in rural Gujarat. Ind Econ Rev 31(2):157–183Google Scholar
  24. Wales TJ, Woodland AD (1980) Sample selectivity and the estimation of labor supply functions. Int Econ Rev 21(2):437–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Study of Regional DevelopmentJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations