The Tensile Fatigue Behaviour of Aligned MWNT/Epoxy Nanocomposites

  • Sasidhar JangamEmail author
  • A. Hema Devi
  • S. Raja
  • K. Hemachandra Reddy
  • G. Vijay Kumar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The emergence of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) has created new opportunities for the fabrication of polymer composites that possess strong potential for a wide spectrum of applications. The one-dimensional structure of carbon nanotubes has a very high anisotropic nature and unusual mechanical properties, which made them as promising nanofiller for the composite structures. But the particle-level exceptional properties are not completely utilised when they are used as reinforcement in composites due to inadequate and immature processing techniques. In the present work, we have made an attempt to utilise the strong anisotropic nature of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) for improving the fatigue life of nanocomposites, especially for very low weight percentages. The MWNTs anisotropy was imparted to the nanocomposites by aligning them in the epoxy matrix with DC electric field during curing. Nanocomposites were made for 0.1 wt% MWNT loading. Totally, three categories of nanocomposites were prepared: nanocomposites with aligned CNT (with electric field), nanocomposites without CNT alignment (without electric field), and neat epoxy for the comparison purpose. The tensile fatigue behaviour was investigated under stress control mode by applying cyclic sinusoidal load with the frequency range of 1–3 Hz and stress ratio of R = 0.1. The specimens were tested for the fatigue load until the failure or 1E+05 cycles. The fractured surfaces were examined through scanning electron microscope to analyse the fatigue fracture behaviour.


Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) Nanocomposites Fatigue Nanotube alignment Digital image correlation (DIC) Toughening mechanisms 



The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the 12th Five Year Plan of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India (Project No. ESC-02-12-02).


  1. 1.
    Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goh PS, Ismail AF, Ng BC (2014) Directional alignment of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrices: contemporary approaches and future advances. Compos Part A 56:103–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rahmat M, Hubert P (2011) Carbon nanotube—polymer interactions in nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 72(1):72–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coleman JN, Khan U, Blau WJ, Gun’ko YK (2006) Small but strong: a review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Carbon N Y 44(9):1624–1652Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wernik JM, Meguid SA (2010) Recent developments in multifunctional nanocomposites using carbon nanotubes. Appl Mech Rev 63(5):050801Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ma P, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim J (2010) Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Compos Part A 41(10):1345–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gopal N, Rana S, Whan J, Li L, Hwa S (2010) Progress in polymer science polymer nanocomposites based on functionalized carbon nanotubes. Prog Polym Sci 35(7):837–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma Y, Wang B, Wu Y, Huang Y, Chen Y (2011) The production of horizontally aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y 49(13):4098–4110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sengezer EC, Seidel GD, Bodnar RJ (2015) Phenomenological characterization of fabrication of aligned pristine-SWNT and COOH-SWNT nanocomposites via dielectrophoresis under AC electric field. Polym Compos 1266–1279Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan SU, Pothnis JR, Kim J-K (2013) Effects of carbon nanotube alignment on electrical and mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 49:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar S, Sharma A, Tripathi B, Srivastava S, Agrawal S, Singh M (2010) Enhancement of hydrogen gas permeability in electrically aligned MWCNT-PMMA composite membranes. Micron 41(7):909–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aldajah S, Haik Y (2012) Transverse strength enhancement of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites by means of magnetically aligned carbon nanotubes. J Mater 34:379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qiu L, Wang X, Su G, Tang D, Zhe X, Zhu J (2016) Remarkably enhanced thermal transport based on a flexible horizontally-aligned carbon nanotube array film. Nature Scientific ReportsGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lim WP, Yao K, Chen Y (2007) Alignment of carbon nanotubes by acoustic manipulation in a fluidic medium. J Phys Chem C 100:16802–16807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spotnitz ME, Stone HA (2004) Dip coating for the alignment of carbon nanotubes on curved surfaces. J Mater Chem 14:1299–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pearson RA (1996) Fatigue of rubber-modified epoxies: effect of particle size and volume fraction. J Mater Sci 31:3777–3789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manjunatha CM, Taylor AC, Kinloch AJ, Sprenger S (2009) The cyclic-fatigue behaviour of an epoxy polymer modified with micron-rubber and nano-silica particles. J Mater Sci 44(16):4487–4490Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parvaneh V, Shariati M (2015) Experimental analysis of the low cycle fatigue of a spray-coated layered multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polyvinyl chloride nanocomposite. J Compos Mater 0(0):1–8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jangam S, Raja S, Maheswar Gowd BU (2016) Influence of multiwall carbon nanotube alignment on vibration damping of nanocomposites. J Reinf Plast Compos 35(8):617–627Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rao S (2008) An emerging, energy-efficient cure process for rapid composite manufacture. In: International conference on aerospace science and technology, Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    American Society for Testing and Materials (2014) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics, ASTM D638-14, Annual book of ASTM Standards, vol 8.01. American Society for Testing and Materials, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Böger L, Sumfleth J, Hedemann H, Schulte K (2010) Composites: part A improvement of fatigue life by incorporation of nanoparticles in glass fibre reinforced epoxy. Compos Part A 41:1419–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Borrego LP, Costa JDM, Ferreira JAM, Silva H (2014) Composites: part B fatigue behaviour of glass fibre reinforced epoxy composites enhanced with nanoparticles. Compos Part B 62:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bortz DR, Merino C, Martin-gullon I (2011) Carbon nanofibers enhance the fracture toughness and fatigue performance of a structural epoxy system. Compos Sci Technol 71(1):31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sasidhar Jangam
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. Hema Devi
    • 1
    • 3
  • S. Raja
    • 1
  • K. Hemachandra Reddy
    • 2
  • G. Vijay Kumar
    • 3
  1. 1.Structural Technologies DivisionCSIR National Aerospace LaboratoriesBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringJawaharlal Nehru Technological UniversityAnantapurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringP.V.P. Siddhartha Institute of TechnologyVijayawadaIndia

Personalised recommendations