Creep–Fatigue Interaction Study on Gas Turbine Engine Alloy

  • Neeta PauloseEmail author
  • D. Chandru Fernando
  • Amborish Banerjee
  • J. K. Sahu
  • S. N. Narendra Babu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Alloy IN 718 is used for manufacturing many critical components of gas turbine engine such as compressor blades, discs, and shafts. During engine operation, these components are subjected to cyclic loading along with steady-state operation at high temperatures. These operating conditions induce damage resulting from interaction of creep and fatigue. In order to predict realistically the life of these components, it is necessary to understand creep–fatigue interaction mechanisms and important to carry out test at conditions simulating engine parameters. Therefore, isothermal LCF tests with and without hold time were conducted at a temperature of 600 °C, strain rate of 10−3 s−1 and total strain amplitude varying from 0.4 to 0.6%. Hold time of 1 and 5 min was inserted at maximum strain amplitude to give tensile dwell condition. In gas turbine engine, the presence of centrifugal force of rotating components leads to sustained tensile load in addition to varying loads; therefore, it was decided to have dwell time at peak tensile strains. The investigation revealed that the fatigue life was adversely affected when hold time was introduced at peak strain. The effect on fatigue life with 1- and 5-min hold is discussed. Deformation mechanism of tested samples was also studied using SEM.


Iron–nickel-based superalloy LCF Creep–fatigue interaction Deformation mechanism 



The authors express their gratitude to DRDO and Director, GTRE for supporting the work and granting permission to publish the data. The support and guidance provided by the Technical and Associate Directors are also gratefully acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge Director, NML for facilitating the mechanical tests at NML.


  1. 1.
    Donachie MJ, Donachie SJ (2002) Superalloys a technical guide, 2nd edn. ASM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wagner HJ, Hall AM (1965) Physical metallurgy of alloy 718. DMIC Report 217Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowers RJ, Lippold JC (1997) The effect of composition and heat treatment cycles on the repair weldability of alloy.joining and repair of gas turbine components. ASM International, pp 41–50Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richards NL, Benhadad S, Chaturvedi MC (2002) The influence of minor elements on the weldability of an Inconel 718-tvpe superalloy. Met Trans 33A:2005–2017Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hu D, Wang R (2009) Experimental study on creep-fatigue interaction behaviour of GH4133B superalloy. Mat Sci Eng A. 515:183–189Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Billot T, Villechaise P, Jouiad M, Mendez J (2010) Creep-fatigue interaction behaviour at high temperature of a Udimet 720 nickel-base superalloy. Int J Fatigue 32:824–829Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tinga T, Brekelmans WAM, Geers MGD (2009) Time-incremental creep-fatigue damage rule for single crystal Ni-base super alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 508:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pierce CJ, Palazotto AN, Rosenberger AH (2010) Creep and fatigue interaction in the PWA1484 single crystal nickel-base alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 527:7484–7489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Totemeier TC, Tian H (2007) Creep-fatigue-environment interactions in Inconel 617. Mater Sci Eng A 468:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith HH, Michel DJ (1986) Effect of environment on fatigue crack propagation behaviour of alloy 718 at elevated temperatures. Metall Trans A 17A:370–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evans WJ, Jones JP, Williams S (2005) The interaction between fatigue, creep and environmental damage in Ti6246 and Udimet 720Li. Int J Fatigue 27:1473–1484Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yokobori T, Yolobori AT Jr (2001) High temperature creep, fatigue and creep-fatigue interaction in engineering materials. Int J Pressure Vessels Pip 78:903–908Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Banerjee A, Sahu JK, Paulose N, Fernando CD, Ghosh RN (2015) Isothermal low cycle fatigue and creep-fatigue interaction behaviour of nickel based superalloy Inconel 718. FFEMS 39(7):877–885Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gopinath K, Gupta RK, Sahu JK, Ray PK, Ghosh RN (2015) Designing P92 grade martensitic steel header pipes against creep–fatigue interaction loading condition: damage micromechanisms. Mat Design 86:411–420Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ostergren WJ (1976) A damage function and associated failure equations for predicting hold time and frequency effects in elevated temperature low cycle fatigue. J Test Eval 4(5):327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neeta Paulose
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Chandru Fernando
    • 1
  • Amborish Banerjee
    • 2
    • 3
  • J. K. Sahu
    • 2
  • S. N. Narendra Babu
    • 1
  1. 1.Gas Turbine Research Establishment, DRDOBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.CSIR-National Metallurgical LaboratoryJamshedpurIndia
  3. 3.University of New South Wales (UNSW)KensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations