Advertisement

Multiaxial Fatigue Analysis—Approach Toward Real-World Life Prediction

  • Pradip PujariEmail author
Conference paper
  • 936 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Conventional fatigue analysis procedures followed in daily practices are at least 10 or more years old. Typically, equivalent stress (on a plane) approach is used for fatigue analysis. However, variation of stresses/strains in a particular plane may not yield accurate results for fatigue life calculation. With new developments in analysis practices and better solver capabilities, it is imperative to evaluate these techniques for fatigue analysis followed today. One such need is to evaluate the fatigue life when loads are highly complex and nonproportional. Study is done here to perform multiaxial fatigue analysis of the structure. It is compared against the existing methods for applicability in terms of cost and solution time. n-code fatigue analysis module is used for the study based on multiaxiality. Multiaxial fatigue analysis requires use of yield criteria to fatigue under combined loading. With nonproportional loading, there is increased strain hardening which needs to be considered appropriately. Hence, based on nonproportionality and biaxiality, a decision matrix is prepared to decide the appropriate notch correction and equivalent stress or strain approach. Notch correction methods studied are Neuber, Hoffmann–Seeger, Glinka and Jiang Sehitoglu. Available n-code multiaxiality options are explored and comparative study among these approaches is summarized here. The n-code multiaxial fatigue analysis proposes two approaches to predict the fatigue life. Two-step analysis and multistep analysis give closer solution to fatigue life, but time required for solution increases drastically. Two-step analysis can be selected as a trade-off for life prediction with multiaxiality in terms of time taken for solution. Multiaxial fatigue analysis is performed on one of our vehicle structure to correlate the results with actual life of the components predicted from the rig test.

Keywords

Equivalent stress Multiaxial fatigue Nonproportionality Biaxiality Neuber correction Hoffmann–Seeger Critical plane approach 

References

  1. 1.
    Meggiolaro MA, de Castro JT, de Oliveira Miranda AC (2009) Evaluation of multiaxial stress-strain models and fatigue life prediction methods under proportional loading. Mechanics of Solids in Brazil, Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Somnath C (2012) Investigation of proportional and non-proportional loading. American Society for Engineering EducationGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    dos Reis Cabrita AJ (2009) Analysis of the non proportionality between stress in multiaxial loadings in austenitic stainless steel (AISI 303). Instituto Superior Técnico—Technical University of Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fatemi A, Socie DF (1988) A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of- phase loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 11(3):149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ince A, Glinka G (2011) A modification of Morrow and Smith–Watson–Topper mean stress correction models. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 34:854–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hancell PJ, Harvey SJ (1979) The use of kinematic hardening models in multiaxial cyclic plasticity. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1:271–279 (Pergamon Press. Printed in Great Britain. Fatigue of Engineering Materials Ltd.)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    n-code document on “Multiaxial_Fatigue_n-code_Heyes_Compatibility_Mode (2015)”Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    nCode Design Life Theory Guide, version 11.0 (2015) HBM-nCodeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neuber H (1961) Theory of stress concentration for shear strained prismatic bodies with arbitrary nonlinear stress—strain law. J Appl Mech 28:544–55126CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Socie DF. Multiaxial Fatigue. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.John Deere Technology CenterPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations