Abstract
This chapter focuses on the relationships between urban public spaces, gay men’s cruising, and the constitution of homosexual subjectivities. Again, People’s Park is chosen as the spatial setting for the case study. The importance of public cruising spaces in organizing both homo-social and homoerotic relations between gay men has been recognized in various works (e.g. Leap 1999). Ever since Humphrey (1970) groundbreaking ethnography on tearoom trade, public spaces for gay cruising have been seen as crucial sites in which vernacular sexual knowledge is produced and a collective gay identity is formulated (Iveson 2007; Turner 2003; Brown 2008). More importantly, public cruising places create constitutive and transformative possibilities for the production of particular gay subjectivities. Cruising places are not only spaces in which normative sexual geographies can be subverted temporarily, but also urban locations where the regulatory power of the state and the society has always-already been established. As Leap (1997) argues, these complex intersections of sexual visibility, spatial politics and regulation unfold in the lives of gay cruisers and also shape their collective sexual experiences and gendered identities. In this sense, an understanding of public cruising space requires analytical energy dedicated to the productive relationships between space, power relations and the constitution of sexual subjectivities (Brickell 2010).
A revised version of the chapter has been published as:
Qian, J. 2017. Beyond heteronormativity? Gay cruising, closeted experiences and self-disciplining subject in People’s Park, Guangzhou. Urban Geography, 38(5): 771–794.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
What is most intriguing in Chauncey’s Gay New York is his detailed depictions of how gay men themselves invented terms and cultural meanings to negotiate with their “deviant” sexual orientation and desire: for example, working class fairies who evoked a notion of effeminacy of gay men in order to justify their sexual encounters/deals with self-defined heterosexual men; also, middle class gay men who attempted to re-enact an identity of masculinity in the struggles of both gender and sexuality.
- 2.
See online news from China Daily:
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-08/29/content_8631091.htm.
- 3.
Extortion and theft generally happens between gay men. For example, one gay man may extort another for a certain amount of money after they have sexual intercourse.
- 4.
In one of these police harassments, for example, over 100 gay cruisers were arrested by the police. The police charged the gay men of prostitution and extortion, but could not present evidence for each gay man they convicted.
- 5.
Ah-Qiang, The secret garden at the crossroad, online article addressing gay cruising in People’s Park, source: http://www.infzm.com/content/28370 (in Chinese language). Ah-Qiang is the Director of PFLAG Guangzhou, a local NGO working on homosexual communities and LGBT rights movement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qian, J. (2018). Closeted Heterotopia: Public Space, Gay Sexuality and Self-disciplining Subject in People’s Park. In: Re-visioning the Public in Post-reform Urban China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5990-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5990-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5989-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5990-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)