Abstract
The changing dynamics of leadership and growing involvement of people in the process of governance can be attributed to an enhanced access to technology, which enables the governed to engage directly and instantly. This is expected to lead to a greater sense of accountability on the part of leaders to render outcomes for the benefit of the public at large. Effective leadership is increasingly seen to play a significant role in institutionalising citizen’s involvement through social media in order to improve the responsibility of political decision-makers towards the citizens. “Governed” have discovered the ability to transform “governance” through the use of technology, such as social media. This chapter examines the role of technology and media, and the interface between the two, as key drivers in the evolving dynamics of state, society and the governance process.
References
Bardhan, Pranab. 1996. Decentralised Development. Indian Economic Review. 31 (2): 139–156.
Barzegar, K. 2012. The Arab Spring and the Balance of Power in the Middle East. http://www.powerandpolicy.com/2012/10/30/the-arab-spring-and-the-balance-of-power-in-the-middle-east/#.UO2nQ-Rg-Hc. Accessed May 2013.
BBC. 2017a. India Court Upholds 2012 Delhi Gang Rapists’ Death Penalty. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-39814910. Accessed May 2017.
BBC. 2017b. BBC to Stream Election Debate via Twitter for First Time. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/40104187. Accessed 31 May 2017.
Bennett, W.Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2011. Digital, Media and the Personalization of Collective Action. Information, Communication and Society 14 (6): 770–799.
Burson-Marsteller. 2017. Twiplomacy Study 2017. http://twiplomacy.com/blog/twiplomacy-study-2017/. Accessed 2 June 2017.
Chenou, Jean-Marie. 2011. Is Internet Governance a Democratic Process? Multi-Stakeholderism and Transnational Elites. Agency for International Development Washington: USAID Policy Democracy and Governance. Directorate for U.S.
Cheema, G. Shabbir, and Linda Maguire. 2002. Democracy, Governance and Development: A Conceptual Framework. United Nations Public Administration Network (UNPAN).
Dasgupta, Aniruddha, and Victoria A. Beard. 2007. Community Driven Development, Collective Action and Elite Capture in Indonesia. Development and Change 38 (2): 229–249.
Deloitte and CII (Confederation of India Industry). 2016. Digital: A Revolution in the Making in India. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/in/Documents/technology-media-telecommunications/in-tmt-digital-revolution-in-making-cii-noexp.pdf. Accessed May 2017.
Farrell, Henry. 2012. The Consequences of the Internet for Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15 (1): 35–52.
Gallacher John D, Monica Kaminska, Bence Kollanyi and Philip N. Howard. 2017. Junk News and Bots during the 2017 UK General Election: What Are UK Voters Sharing Over Twitter?.
Gillespie, Nicole A., A. Nicole, and Leon Mann. 2004. Transformational Leadership and Shared Values: The Building Blocks of Trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology 19 (6): 588–607.
Hoffmann, Bert. 2011. Civil Society: How the Internet Changes State-Society Relations in Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of Cuba. German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA) Working Paper 156.
Indian Express. 2017. PM Modi Second-Most Followed World Leader on Twitter After Trump. http://indianexpress.com/article/india/narendra-modi-third-most-followed-world-leader-on-twitter-pope-francis-donald-trump-report-4683203/. Accessed 2 June 2017.
International Telecommunications Union. 2016. ICT Facts and Figures. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2016.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2017.
Justice Verma Committee Report. 2013. http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Justice%20verma%20committee/js%20verma%20committe%20report.pdf. Accessed July 2013.
Lee Paul, S.N., Clement Y.K. So, and Louis Leung. 2015. Social Media and Umbrella Movement: Insurgent Public Sphere in Formation. Chinese Journal of Communication 8 (4): 356–375.
Lei Ya-Wen. 2011. The Political Consequences of the Rise of the Internet: Political Beliefs and Practices of Chinese Netizens, 28 (3): 291–322.
Leveson Enquiry. 2012. Report into the Culture, Practises and Ethics of the Press. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-inquiry-report-into-the-culture-practices-and-ethics-of-the-press. Accessed March 2013.
Loader Brian, D., Ariadne Vromen, and Michael A. Xenos. 2014. The Networked Young Citizen: Social Media, Political Participation and Civic Engagement. Information, Communication and Society 17 (2): 143–150.
Loader, Brian D., and Dan Mercea. 2011. Networking Democracy? Information, Communication and Society 14 (6): 757–769.
Meindl, J.R., S.B. Ehrlich, and J. Dukerich. 1985. The Romance of Leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (1): 78–102.
Miliband, Ralph. 1983. State power and class interests. New Left Review 138 (March–April): 57–68.
Nisbet, Erik C., Stoycheff Elizabeth, and Katy E. Pearce. 2012. Internet Use and Democratic Demands: A Multinational Multilevel Model of Internet Use and Citizen Attitudes About Democracy. Journal of Communication 62 (2): 249–265.
Phillips Byrn. 2015. I was one of the London Rioters. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/11/london-rioters-2011-anger-inequality-distrust-police. Accessed June 2015.
Radu, Roxana, Nicolo Zingales, and Enrico Calandro. 2015. Crowdsourcing Ideas as an Emerging Form of Multi-Stakeholder Participation in Internet Governance. Policy and Internet 7 (3): 362–382.
Raftree, L. 2011. Wait… What? Bridging Community Development and Technology. http://lindaraftree.com/2011/12/01/new-technology-and-good-governance/. Accessed May 2013.
Safranek, Rita. 2012. The Emerging Role of Social Media in Political and Regime Change.
Imad, Salamey. 2015. Post-Arab Spring: Changes and Challenges. Third World Quarterly 36 (1): 111–129.
Singh, Manish. 2017. WhatsApp Hits 200 million Active Users in India. http://mashable.com/2017/02/24/whatsapp-india-200-million-active-users/#N2yHnK21ksqX. Accessed 2 June 2017.
Skinner, J. 2011. Social Media and Revolution: The Arab Spring and the Occupy Movement as Seen Through Three Information Studies Paradigms, Sprouts. Working Papers on Information Systems 11 (169).
Statista. 2017. Number of Mobile Cell Phone Subscriptions in CHINA. https://www.statista.com/statistics/467160/forecast-of-smartphone-users-in-china/. Accessed 2 June 2017.
Taylor, K. 2011. Arab Spring Really was Social Media Revolution. http://www.tgdaily.com/software-features/58426-arab-spring-really-was-social-media-revolution. Accessed May 2013.
The Economist. 2013a. The New Politics of the Internet: Everything is Connected. http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21569041-can-internet-activism-turn-real-political-movement-everything-connected. 5 January.
The Economist. 2013b. Has the Arab spring failed? A special report. July 13–19 2013.
UNDP. 2012. New Technologies Play Key Role in Strengthening Democracies. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourperspective/ourperspectivearticles/2012/09/14/new-technologies-play-key-role-in-strengthening-democracies-/. Accessed 31 May 2017.
Unwin, Tim. 2012. Social Media and Democracy: Critical Reflections.
Vaccari, Cristian. 2008. Surfing to the Élysée: The Internet in the 2007 French Elections. French Politics 6 (1): 1–22.
Voltmer, Katrin. 2010. The Media, Government Accountability, and Citizen Engagement. Public Sentinel: News Media and Governance Reform, Washington: World Bank 395.
West, S. M. 2017. Searching for the Public in Internet Governance: Examining Infrastructures of Participation at NETmundial. Policy and Internet online. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/poi3.143/full.
Wildavsky, A. 1985. ‘A Cultural Theory of Leadership’ In Leadership and Politics: New Perspectives in Political Science ed. B.D. Jones, University of Kansas Press.
Wong, Susan, and Scott Guggenheim. 2005. Community-Driven Development: Decentralization’s Accountability Challenge, 253–265. East Asia Decentralizes: Making Local Government Work.
World Bank. 2017. Mobile Cellular Subscriptions. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.CEL.SETS.P2. Accessed 31 May 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kattumuri, R. (2018). Technology as a Driver for Governance by the People for the People. In: Sekher, M., Parasuraman, S., Kattumuri, R. (eds) Governance and Governed. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5963-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5963-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5962-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5963-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)