Skip to main content

Cultivating Creativity by Scaling up Maker Education in K-12 Schools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Authentic Learning Through Advances in Technologies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

Maker Education is one of the effective complements for traditional classroom education, which bears the potential of boosting knowledge learning, practical ability and creativity cultivation. Upon a brief retrospect of the history of China’s” Maker Movement” and an exploration of innovation ability and intelligence development, this thesis summarizes the traits of students’ cognitive development and scientific literacy during each stage of K-12 education and probes into the development approach of Maker Education in K-12 schools. The author believes that Maker Education should resort to different strategies according to students’ cognitive development and scientific literacy, including “learning by gaming,” “learning by doing” and “learning by working” based on real-life contexts in a piecewise manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, C. (2012). Maker: New Industrial Revolution (pp. 9–23). Beijing: China Citic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, S. J. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed., pp. 58–59). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1901). The placement of manual training in the elementary course of study. Manual Training Magazine, 2, 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docket, S. (1999). Thinking about play, playing about thinking. Sydney: Maclennan Petty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Wall Street Journal, 12, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (p. 98). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, X. L., & Ding, Z. Y. (2005). “Learning by Doing”: A form of scientific education for kids. Educational Research, 6, 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. F. (2015, November 5). Perspectives on china’s maker culture. Science and Technology Daily, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. T., Gao, H. Y., et al. (2016). The transition of STEAM education to maker education under the background of internet + — from project-based learning to creativity cultivation. Distance Education Journal, 5, 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Thomas, J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unkowns. American Psychologist, 2, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997). A triarchic view of giftedness: Theory and practice (pp. 43–53). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2005). The theory of successful intelligence. International Journal of Psychology, 2, 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). The role of play in development. Mind in Society, 5, 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watagodakumbura, C. (2013). Benefiting from authentic education to a sustainable social development. Journal of International Education Research, 9, 171. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1433387865?accountid=8554.

  • Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Jameson, H., et al. (2009). Play, cognition and self-regulation: What exactly are children learning when they learn through play? Educational and Child Psychology, 26, 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. Maker culture[OL]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maker_culture.

  • Zhang, J. W., & Sun, Y. Q. (2006). From “Learning by doing” to constructivism—A study on the theoretical course of learning. Theory and Practice of Education, 7, 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, C. D. (2008). Developmental psychology (p. 501). Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z. C., & Zhu, Z. X. (2003). Child Psychology (p. 165). Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

If you wish to acknowledge persons who contributed or sponsoring agencies, do so here in this optional section.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronghuai Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huang, R., Liu, X. (2018). Cultivating Creativity by Scaling up Maker Education in K-12 Schools. In: Chang, TW., Huang, R., Kinshuk (eds) Authentic Learning Through Advances in Technologies. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5930-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5930-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5929-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5930-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics