Skip to main content

A Tale of Two Cities: Innovation in Singapore and Hong Kong

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation in the Asia Pacific
  • 1100 Accesses

Abstract

Singapore and Hong Kong are two small highly successful economies in Asia that illustrate very divergent paths of catching up and innovation as Jue Wang reveals. Singapore and Hong Kong have a similar history: both developed from British colonies and experienced an upgrade of industrial structure from labor intensive industries such as textile and clothing to high tech industries such as electronics and to banking and financial services (Young in NBER Macroeconomics Annual 7:13–51, 1992). The two city states have comparable economic performance and competitiveness and are often placed close to each other in various rankings such as Global Competitiveness Report (WEF 2016), World Competitiveness Yearbook (IMD 2016), Global Innovation Index (GII 2016). The GDP per capita in these two economies was almost identical until the 2000s. Singapore’s economic growth slowed down in the late 1990s but quickly recovered and surpassed Hong Kong in 2004 and even overtook the US in 2011. With its recent success in finance and other sectors, Singapore is presently ahead of Hong Kong on many indicators. Although there are many similarities, the differences in the development trajectory of these two cities are clear, the most important distinction is the role of the government. Singapore is noted as government-made city-state for the high level of government intervention in various aspects of the society (Mok in Res Policy, 34, 537–554, 2005). By contrast, Hong Kong adopts a “positive non-intervention” policy that favors the free economy and minimizes the power of government in influencing the market. The difference is reflected in the innovation policy in these two economies. The Singapore government has actively implemented a series of strategies and allocated substantial funds to promote innovation and entrepreneurship. While a similar set of policies and programs are in place to drive research and innovation in Hong Kong, the scale is much smaller.

This chapter is a revised version of the journal article Wang (2018) Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The currency Singapore Dollar was converted to US Dollar based on the Foreign Exchange Rates in the respective years published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h10/hist/). The currency Hong Kong Dollar was converted to US Dollar based on the fixed exchange rate of US$1 = HK$7.8 as published by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (http://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/key-functions/monetary-stability/history-hong-kongs-exchange-rate-system.shtml).

  2. 2.

    The currency was converted based on the Foreign Exchange Rate 2012 published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. USD: SGD was 1:1.22 (30th December 2012). http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h10/hist/.

  3. 3.

    A patent is classified under MNCs if the parent firm or headquarter of the applicant firm is located in other countries, despite the fact that the applicant firm might be based in Singapore.

  4. 4.

    Includes Hong Kong Productivity Council, Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institutes, Hong Kong R&D Center for Logistics and Supply Chain Management Enabling Technologies, Hong Kong Institute of Textiles and Apparel, and Nano and Advanced Materials Institute.

References

  • ASTAR. (2013). National survey of R&D in Singapore 2012. Singapore: Agency for Science, Technology and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • C&SD. (2013). Hong Kong innovation activities statistics 2012. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • C&SD. (2014). Hong Kong innovation activities statistics 2013. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • C&SD. (2015a). Hong Kong Statistics, http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp250.jsp?tableID=036&ID=0&productType=8. Accessed November 6th 2015.

  • C&SD. (2015b). 2014 Gross Domestic Product. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDB. (2015). 2015 Policy Address—CEDB Major Policy Initiatives: Innovation and Technology, http://www.cedb.gov.hk/about/policy3.htm. Accessed 15th November 2015.

  • Cheung, A. B. L. (2000). New interventionism in the making: Interpreting state interventions in Hong Kong after the change of sovereignty. Journal of Contemporary China, 9(24), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H. (1996). High IQ and low technology: Hong Kong’s key to success. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 684–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOS. (2013). Yearbook of Statistics Singapore 2013. In Department of Statistics Singapore (ed.), Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, D. B. (2010). Government neglect and the decline of Hong Kong’s integrated circuit design industry. In D. B. Fuller (Ed.), Innovation policy and the limits of Laissez-fair: Hong Kong’s policy in comparative perspective (pp. 242–266). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • GII. (2016). The global innovation index 2016 report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstadt, L. F. (2005). Uneasy partners: The conflict between public interest and private profit in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., & Sharif, N. (2009). Manufacturing dynamics and spillvers: The case of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan (HKMT). Research Policy, 38(5), 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, W. Gregg. (1995). The developmental State, Government, and Singapore’s economic development since 1960. World Development, 23(8), 1421–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMD. (2016). IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2016. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD World Competitiveness Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITC. (2015). Innovation and technology fund: Memorandum note. Hong Kong: Innovation and Technology Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2015). Hong Kong to Foster IT Industry with New Bureau Established, CRIEnglish http://english.cri.cn/12394/2015/11/21/4203s905183.htm. Accessed 24th November 2015.

  • Mok, K. H. (2005). Fostering entrepreneurship: Changing role of government and higher education governance in Hong Kong. Research Policy, 34, 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRF. (2015). Innovation and Enterprise Milestones, http://www.nrf.gov.sg/innovation-enterprise/innovation-enterprise-milestones. Accessed 5 June 2015.

  • Sharif, N. (2012). Facilitating and promoting innovative entrepreneurship in Hong Kong: Theory and practice. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, C., & Chen, S.-H. (2010). On reform of Hong Kong’s Public Research Funding System. In D. B. Fuller (Ed.), Innovation policy and the limits of Laissez-faire: Hong Kong’s policy in comparative perspective (pp. 114–144). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, C. H. (2015). Opening of the Singapore Scientific Conference 2015, https://www.mha.gov.sg/Newsroom/speeches/other-speeches/Pages/The-Opening-of-the-Singapore-Scientific-Conference-2015-Speech-by-Mr-Teo-Chee-Hean,-Deputy-Prime-Minister.aspx. Accessed 15 November 2015.

  • USPTO. (2015). Types of patents, http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/patdesc.htm. Accessed 16 November 2015.

  • Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEF. (2016). The global competitiveness report 2016–2017. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P.-K. (2001). The role of State in Singapore’s industrial development. In P.-K. Wong & C.-Y. Ng (Eds.), Industrial policy, innovation and economic growth: The experience of Japan and the East Asian NIEs (pp. 503–569). Singapore: Singapore University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016). GDP per capita (current US$), http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?page=6. Accessed January 15 2016.

  • Yam, R. C. M., et al. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Research Policy, 40, 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W.-C. (2000). State intervention and neoliberalism in the globalizing world economy: Lessons from Singapore’s regionalization programme. The Pacific Review, 13(1), 133–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1992). A tale of two cities: Factor accumulation and technical change in Hong Kong and Singapore. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 7, 13–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jue Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, J. (2018). A Tale of Two Cities: Innovation in Singapore and Hong Kong. In: Clarke, T., Lee, K. (eds) Innovation in the Asia Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5895-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics