Skip to main content

Developing Human Capital for Knowledge Based Economies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation in the Asia Pacific

Abstract

In Part III of the book the organisational and human dimensions of innovation in the Asia Pacific are examined, beginning with Clarke and Gholamshahi’s analysis of the significance of human capital for the development of knowledge-based economies. In the OECD countries, more than half of GDP is accounted for by knowledge-based industries, including the main producers of high-technology goods, high and medium technology manufacturing, and knowledge intensive services such as finance, insurance, business, communication and social services. This is manifest in the rising human capital levels of the population in OECD countries as measure in educational attainment, and in the increased demand for highly educated and highly skilled workers. The challenge for the Asia Pacific is to develop the human, social and institutional capital necessary for successfully competing in the knowledge economy. The Forum for the Future (2016) suggest a five capitals model of human capital, social capital, finance capital, manufacturing capital and natural capital. Defining human capital as people’s health and well-being, knowledge, skills and motivation, and defining social capital as the institutions which sustain and develop human capital in partnership with others for example families, communities, businesses, unions, schools and voluntary organizations including the values and behaviours that allow these social forms to operate). Human capital is one of these five interdependent forms of capital, and is not a separate, substitutable item in itself (that is human capital works with and complements other forms of capital). Human and social capital become ever more critical as the knowledge economy progresses. Hoff and Stiglitz insist, “Development is no longer seen primarily as a process of capital accumulation but rather as a process of organizational change” (2001: 389). The Asian Development Bank in a report on Moving Towards Knowledge-Based Economies (2007) suggests a new paradigm for economic development “It is even envisaged that knowledge can eventually become a means of mass production—similar to manual labour in the industrial economy—once web-based information and communication technologies (ICTs) have reached worldwide penetration levels, allowing individuals to work and provide routine knowledge in a virtually networked (global) environment” (ADB 2007: ix).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • ADB. (2007). Moving toward knowledge-based economies: Asian experiences. Asian Development Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairoch, P. (1982). International industrialisation levels from 1750–1980. Journal of European History, 2, 268–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, M. (1969). Economics of education. Review of Educational Research, 39(5), 641–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brungs, A. (2017). Innovation precincts. University of Technology Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2006). Rationales for public policy intervention from a systems of innovation approach: The case of VINNOVA. CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper Series Paper no. 2006/04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, M. (2015). Diasporas as drivers of national competitiveness, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. (2016). Engaging diasporas: The case of Australia and other key countries. Consultancy Report for Securing Australia’s Future Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (1999) The development of management education in China. Education and training, 41(6/7), 273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N., & Bunnell, T. (2003). Spatializing knowledge communities: Towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks. Global Networks, 3(4), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (2006). Towards a new paradigm of development: Implications for the determinants of international business activity. Transnational Corporations, 15(1), 173–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2001). The elusive quest for growth: Economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (2007). In Search of the 21st Century Developmental State. Berkeley: University of California. Working Paper. July 27, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P., & Staveteig, S. (2006). 21st Century Industrialisation and Development in the Global South: The Chinese case in comparative-historical perspective. Berkeley: University of California. Working Paper. January 17, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favell, A., Feldblum, M., & Smith, M. (2007) The human face of global mobility. Society, 44(2), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1995). The “National System of Innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (2008). Systems of innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L., Smith, K., Toivanen, O., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2003). Evaluation of the finnish innovation support system (38 pp). Finland: Ministry of Trade and Industry Publications 5/2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, G. B., & Hoevan, R. (2004). The social dimension of globalisation. Working Paper Number 24. World Commission on the Social Dimensions of Globalisation. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, W. F. (2003). Agenda for Asian Regionalism. Japanese Economy, 32(21), 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (2004). The mystery of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Mike Hobday. Research Policy, 26(6), 689–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, K., & Stiglitz, J. (2001). Modern economic theory and development. In G. Meier & J. Stiglitz (Eds.), Frontiers of development economics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM. (2017). Upskilling India: Building India’s talent base to compete in the global economy. IBM Institute for Business Value.

    Google Scholar 

  • JETRO. (1998). Jetero hakusho, white paper. Tokyo: JETRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1994). The myth of Asia’s miracle. Foreign Affairs, 73(6), 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Globalization and the inequality of nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 857–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasserre, P. (2003). Global strategic management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C. (1999). Towards a competence theory of the region. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective learning. Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity, Regional Studies, 33, 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingle, C. (1997). The rise and decline of the Asian century. Hong Kong: Asia 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, C. (2017). New chancellor says UTS has people focus to make innovation work. http://newsroom.uts.edu.au/news/2017/04/new-chancellor-says-uts-has-people-focus-make-innovation-work

  • Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (2000). The world economy: A millennial perspective. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahroum, S. (2000). Scientific mobility. Science Communication, 2(4), 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute. (2015). The China effect on global innovation. McKinsey Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. B. (2001). Network approach versus brain drain: Lessons from the diaspora. International Migration, 39(5), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizrahi, Y. (2004). Capacity enhancement indicators. World Bank Institute: Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty, D., & Arnold, E. (2003). Understanding innovation: The need for a systemic approach (The IPTS Report. 71 Seville IPTS).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2000). Science, technology and innovation in the new economy. OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Competencies for the knowledge economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2003). Human capital formation and foreign direct investment in developing countries. Paris: OECD. Working Paper 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, T., Castello, S., & Phillips, R. J. (2001). The internet revolution, the McLuhan stage of catch-up, and institutional reforms in Asia. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(2), 289–298. (Lincoln: Association for Evolutionary Economics Fiscal Office).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. (2009). The sustainable competitive advantage and catching-up of nations: FDI, clusters, and the liability (Asset) of smallness? Management International Review, 49(1), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., Ketels, C., & Delgado, M. (2007). The microeconomic foundations of prosperity: Findings from the business competitiveness index. In A. Lopez-Claros, M. E. Porter, X. Sali-i-Martin, & K. Schwab (Eds.), The Global Competitiveness Report 2006–2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • PWC. (2016). Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise. PWC. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/industries-4.0/landing-page/industry-4.0-building-your-digital-enterprise-april-2016.pdf

  • Rodrik, D. (2004). Growth Strategies. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The Primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Kemmis, D. (2008). Industry policy frameworks for a knowledge economy. In Review of the Australian Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industry (Vol. 2). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, H., & Taylor, L. (1990). The state and industrial strategy. World Development, 18(6), 861–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O. (2003). Social networks and industrial geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 513–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staber, U. (2001). The structure of networks in industrial districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2000). Managing intellectual capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29, 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Leonard, S. (Eds.). (2002). Embedded enterprise and social capital. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpin, T., Woolley, R., & Marceau, J. (2010). Scientists across the boundaries: National and global dimensions of scientific and technical human capital (STHC) and policy implications for Australia. Asia Pacific Migration Journal, 19(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2005a). China in a globalising world. New York and Geneva: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2005b). Trade and development report: New features of global interdependence. UN: New York and Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2007). World Investment Prospects Survey 2007–2009. UNCTAD. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs//wips2007_en.pdf

  • UNESCO. (2016). UNESCO science report—Towards 2030. UNESCO Publishing. http://en.unesco.org/unesco_science_report

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2006). The knowledge economy, the kam methodology and world bank operations. World Bank Institute: Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, P. (2001). Asian economies striving to enhance innovation capabilities. Research Technology Management, 44(1), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1994). Lessons from the East Asian NIE’s: A contrarian view. European Economic Review, 38, 964–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S. (2004). Competitiveness through technological advances under global production networking. In Yusuf et al. (2004a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S., Anjum Altaf, M., & Nabeshima, K. (Eds.). (2004a). Global production networking and technological change in East Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S., Anjum Altaf, M., & Nabeshima, K. (Eds.). (2004b). Global change and East Asian policy initiatives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S., & Evenett, S. J. (2002). Can East Asia compete?. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, et al. (2003). Innovative East Asia: The future of growth. Washington D.C.: Worlds Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Clarke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clarke, T., Gholamshahi, S. (2018). Developing Human Capital for Knowledge Based Economies. In: Clarke, T., Lee, K. (eds) Innovation in the Asia Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5895-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics