Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Border Insolvency

Abstract

Insolvency law plays a vital part in a modern free enterprise economy as it provides for an equitable distribution of an insolvent debtor’s assets to its creditors. The effect and reach of a State’s insolvency laws has become more important as the world’s economies have become more consolidated and interdependent. As a result, laws relating to cross-border insolvency have acquired a high profile and greater importance since the mid-twentieth century. Such laws deal with the situation where an insolvent debtor trades, or has assets or creditors, in more than one jurisdiction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sefa M Franken, ‘Cross-Border Insolvency Law: A Comparative Institutional Analysis’ (2014) 34.1 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 97, 102–4.

  2. 2.

    See Jay Lawrence Westbrook, ‘Breaking Away: Local Priorities and Global Assets’ (2011) 46 Texas International Law Journal 601; Robert K Rasmussen, ‘Where are all the Transnational Bankruptcies? The Puzzling Case for Universalism’ (2007) 32 Brookland Journal of International Law, 983; Rosalind Mason, ‘Local Proceedings in a Multi-State Liquidation: Issues of Jurisdiction’ (2006) 30 Melbourne University Law Review 145, Jay Lawrence Westbrook ‘A Global Solution to Multinational Default’ (2000) 98 Michigan Law Review 2276; Alexander M Kipnis, ‘Beyond UNCITRAL: Alternatives to Universality in Transnational Insolvency’ (2008) 36 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 155; Jay Lawrence Westbrook (ed) et al., A Global View of Business Insolvency Systems (Martinus Nijhoff, 2010) 230–1.

  3. 3.

    See Ian Fletcher, “‘Le enfer, c’est les autres’: Evolving Approaches to the Treatment of Security Rights in Cross-Border Insolvency’” (2011) 46 Texas International Law Journal 489, 498–501; Mason, ‘Local Proceedings in a Multi-State Liquidation: Issues of Jurisdiction’ see footnote 2; Westbrook, ‘Breaking Away: Local Priorities and Global Assets’ see footnote 2; Kipnis, see footnote 2.

  4. 4.

    McGrath v Riddell [2008] 3 All ER 869, 881[30], cited in Ackers v Saad Investment Company Ltd (in liq) (2010) 190 FCR 285, 295 [47]; See also Lord Collins comments in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2012] 3 WLR 1019, 1030.

  5. 5.

    McGrath v Riddell [2008] 3 All ER 869 [44].

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    Lynn M LoPucki, ‘ Cooperation in International Bankruptcy: A Post-Universalist Approach’ (1999) 84 Cornell Law Review 696, 750; Contra, Jay Lawrence Westbrook, ‘A Global Solution to Multinational Default’ see footnote 2, 2307–2326; Mason, ‘Local Proceedings in a Multi-State Liquidation: Issues of Jurisdiction’, see footnote 2; Kipnis, see footnote 2; Westbrook et al., A Global View of Business Insolvency Systems, see footnote 2, 229–30.

  8. 8.

    Judge Leif M Clark and Karen Goldstein, ‘Scared Cows: How to Care for Secured Creditors’ Rights in Cross-Border Bankruptcies’ (2011) 46 Texas International Law Journal 513; Mason, ‘Local Proceedings in a Multi-State Liquidation: Issues of Jurisdiction’, see footnote 2; Kipnis, see footnote 2.

  9. 9.

    Edward J Janger, ‘Universal Proceduralism’ (2007) 32 Brookland Journal of International Law 818.

  10. 10.

    Bob Wessels ‘Cross-Border Insolvency Law in Europe: Present Status and Future Prospects’ (2008) 11 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 68, 71-2; Anthony V Sexton, ‘Current Problems and Trends in the Administration of Transnational Insolvencies Involving Enterprise Groups: The Mixed Record of Protocols, the UNCITRAL Model Insolvency Law, and the EU Insolvency Regulation’ (2012) 12 Chicago Journal of International Law 811, 815.

  11. 11.

    European Commission ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventive restructuring frameworks, second chance and measures to increase efficiency of restructuring, insolvency and discharge procedures and amending Directive 2012/30/EU’ 2016/0359 (COD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Hannan B.Ec, LLB (Monash) Ph.D (UWA) .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hannan, N. (2017). Introduction. In: Cross-Border Insolvency. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5876-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5876-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5875-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5876-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics