Abstract
During past seismic events several cases of concrete bridges with poor structural behaviour and severe damage were reported. In this chapter, common damage patterns in RC bridges are illustrated, with reference to several previous studies about the seismic performance of bridge components. The focus of the chapter is on pier behaviour, wherein damage is usually more significant and quite often there is a need to retrofit these elements. In this context, the main objective of this chapter is to present the most common retrofitting strategies for RC bridges and the resulting benefits to their structural behaviour. Several types of piers are considered, where the cross section ranges from solid to hollow and from circular to rectangular. One of the most common retrofit measures for RC bridge piers is the full or partial jacket, which can be made in FRP, steel or RC. Experimental and numerical tests were carried out to assess the benefits to bridge pier behaviour, resulting from shear strengthening of piers with hollow cross section. Moreover, analytical studies are presented on the performance of bridges retrofitted using different techniques, aiming at strengthening and/or confinement, and a method for assessing the seismic fragility of retrofitted bridges is described, along with an application to a bridge with circular piers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Seible F, Priestley M, Hegemier G, Innamorato D. Seismic retrofit of RC columns with continuous carbon fiber jackets. J Compos Constr. 1997;1:52.
Gergely I, Pantelides C, Nuismer R, Reaveley L. Bridge pier retrofit using fiber-reinforced plastic composites. J Compos Constr. 1998;2:165.
Parvin A, Wang W. Behavior of FRP jacketed concrete columns under eccentric loading. J Compos Constr. 2001;5:146.
Santarosa D, Campos Filho A, Beber A, Camplagnolo J. Concrete columns confined with CFRP sheets. In: JG T, editor. International conference on FRP composites in civil engineering. Hong Kong, China; 2001.
Teng J, Chen J, Smith S, Lam L. FRP strengthened RC structures. New York: Wiley; 2001.
Hadi MNS. Behaviour of FRP wrapped normal strength concrete columns under eccentric loading. Compos Struct. 2006;72:503–11.
Ogata T, Osada K. Seismic retrofitting of expressway bridges in Japan. Cem Concr Compos. 2000;22:17–27.
Cheng CT, Yang JC, Yeh YK, Chen SE. Seismic performance of repaired hollow-bridge piers. Constr Build Mater. 2003;17:339–51.
Mo YL, Yeh YK, Hsieh DM. Seismic retrofit of hollow rectangular bridge columns. ASCE J Compos Constr. 2004;8:43–51.
Pavese A, Bolognini D, Peloso S. FRP seismic retrofit of RC square hollow section bridge piers. J Earthq Eng. 2004;8:225–50.
Yeh YK, Mo YL. Shear retrofit of hollow bridge piers with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer sheets. J Compos Constr. 2005;9:327–36.
Tsionis G, Pinto AV. Numerical analysis of RC bridge piers with rectangular hollow cross-section retrofitted with FRP jackets. J Earthq Eng. 2007;11:607–30.
Lignola GP, Prota A, Manfredi G, Cosenza E. Non-linear modeling of RC rectangular hollow piers confined with CFRP. Compos Struct. 2009;88:56–64.
Delgado P, Arêde A, Vila Pouca N, Rocha P, Costa A, Delgado R. Retrofit of RC hollow piers with CFRP sheets. Compos Struct. 2012;94(4):1280–7.
Priestley M, Seible F, Calvi G. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley; 1996.
Oliveira CS, Azevedo J, Delgado R, Costa AG, Costa AC. O Sismo de Northridge, Los Angeles, 17 de Janeiro de 1994—Ensinamentos para Portugal. Edição Conjunta dos IC-IST/IC-FEUP: Lisboa; 1995 (in Portuguese).
EASY. Earthquake Engineering Slide Information System; 1997. http://www.ikpir.fgg.uni-lj.si/easy/.
NISEE. National Information Service for Earthquake Engineering, University of California, Berkeley; 2006. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/taiwan/.
EERI. Learning from Earthquakes: The Wenchuan, Sichuan Province, China, Earthquake of May 12, 2008, EERI—Special Earthquake Report—October, 2008.
ISSN. General introduction of engineering damage of Wenchuan Ms 8.0 earthquake. J Earthq Eng Vib; 2008.
Delgado R, Delgado P, Vila Pouca N, Arêde A, Rocha P, Costa A. Shear effects on hollow section piers under seismic actions: experimental and numerical analysis. Bull Earthq Eng. 2009;7:377–89.
Delgado P, Monteiro A, Arêde A, Vila Pouca N, Delgado R, Costa A. Numerical simulations of RC hollow piers under horizontal cyclic loading. J Earthq Eng. 2011;15(6):833–49.
Delgado P, Sousa F, Rocha P, Arêde A, Vila Pouca N, Costa A, Delgado R. Experimental and numerical analysis on the cyclic behavior of bridge piers with and without CFRP retrofit. In: 5th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and Earthquake engineering. COMPDYN 2015.
Faria R, Oliver J, Cervera M. A strain-based plastic viscous-damage model for massive concrete structures. Int J Solids Struct. 1998;35(14):1533–58.
Seismosoft. SeismoStruct. computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. http://www.seismosoft.com.
Yashinsky M. Performance of bridge seismic retrofits during Northridge earthquake. J Bridge Eng ASCE. 1998;3(1):1–14.
Federal Highway Administration (USA): Seismic retrofitting manual for highway structures: part 1—Bridges. Publication no. FHWA-HRT-06-032, McLean, VA; 2006.
Kim S-H, Shinozuka M. Development of fragility curves of bridges retrofitted by column jacketing. Probab Eng Mech. 2004;19(1–2):105–12.
Padgett JE, DesRoches R. Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2008;37(8):1157–74.
Stefanidou SP, Kappos AJ. Methodology for the development of bridge-specific fragility curves. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2017;46(1):73–93.
Stefanidou SP, Kappos AJ. Efficiency of different retrofit measures in reducing seismic fragility of bridges. In: 16th European Bridge conference, Edinburgh, June 2015, Paper no. 1477.
Papanikolaou VK. Analysis of arbitrary composite sections in biaxial bending and axial load. Comput Struct. 2012;98–99:33–54.
Stefanidou SP. Structure-specific Fragility Curves for As-Built and Retrofitted Bridges. Ph.D. thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece; 2016.
Acknowledgements
Part of this work reports to research financially supported by Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007457—CONSTRUCT—Institute of R&D in Structures and Construction, funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Delgado, P., Kappos, A. (2018). Strengthening of RC Bridges. In: Costa, A., Arêde, A., Varum, H. (eds) Strengthening and Retrofitting of Existing Structures. Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, vol 9. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5858-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5858-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5857-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5858-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)