Evaluation of the Structural Integrity of Full-Scale Wing of Aerial Vehicle

  • D. Venkata Sivakumar
  • M. Varadanam
  • K. Kishore Kumar
  • P. S. R. Anjaneyulu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


This paper describes the details of an experimental investigation focusing on the structural integrity and evaluates the structural characteristics like strain and deformation of the full-scale composite wing of aerial vehicle. The structural testing of composite wing is greatly influenced by the size of the structure, nature of loads, and boundary conditions at the supports. It is conventional to assume span-wise aerodynamic load distribution for aerial structure of typical aspect ratio, i.e., between 10 and 15. Apart from the span-wise load distribution on the wing, the other important parameters like chord-wise distribution of load, angle of attack at which the primary composite structure to be tested, the landing gear loads at the wing, and engine interfaces need to be simulated during the test. Generally, wing structures are tested for the worst case in terms of combined lift and drag which simulates the worst bending and twisting loads of the flight envelope. Care should be taken for distributing the lumped loads at desired locations; else it could lead to local stress concentration and local failure of the structure. In most of the structural tests, shear and bending will be captured, but twisting needs special attention in distributing the loads at spar/rib locations without altering the center of pressure of the aerodynamic load distribution. Adequacy of the test rigs and proper simulation of all attachments are addressed. The design and implementation of the structural integrity test along with experimental results are presented.


Aerial vehicle Composite wing Structural integrity Strain gage and limit load 



This research was supported by structural test facility, DRDL, and we are thankful to testing team for assistance in all aspects. The authors are thankful to Director, DRDL for pursuing this research paper.


  1. 1.
    Tsai SW, Wu EM (1980) A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater 5:58–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frulla G, Cestino E (2008) Design, manufacturing and testing of a HALE-UAV structural demonstrator. Compos Struct 83:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta SG, Ghonge MM, Dr. Jawandhiya PM (2013) Review of unmanned aircraft system (UAS). Int J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol (IJARCET) 2(4)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sullivan RW, Hwang Y, Rais-Rohani M, Lacy T (2009) Structural analysis and testing of an ultra-light unmanned-aerial-vehicle carbon-composite wing. J Aircr 46(3)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maksimovic S, Ilic I (2013) Structural analysis and static strength testing of a tactical unmanned aerial vehicle. Sci Tech Rev 63(2):58–62Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sullivan R, Rais-Rohani M, Lacy T, Alday N (2006) Structural testing of an ultra-light UAV composite wing. Presented at the 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and material conference, Newport, Rhode Island, 1–4 May 2006Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pritchard JI (1976) An overview of landing gear dynamics, NASA/TM-1999-209143-TR-1976Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dally JW, Riley WF (1991) Experimental stress analysis. McGraw- Hill IncGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simsiriwong J, Ullivan RW (2010) Vibration testing of a carbon composite fuselage. Int J Veh Noise VibGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Venkata Sivakumar
    • 1
  • M. Varadanam
    • 1
  • K. Kishore Kumar
    • 1
  • P. S. R. Anjaneyulu
    • 1
  1. 1.Defence Research & Development LaboratoryHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations