Estimation of Aerodynamic Coefficient for a Variable Span Wing and a C-Wing for Application in Personal Air Vehicles (PAV)

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

In last decade, most of the researchers have an interest in making the automobiles into flying objects and make them fly. In this paper, novel conceptual design is put forward for personal air vehicle (PAV) which can use the existing infrastructure created for automobiles and planes. This conceptual design has been made by combining C-wing and telescopic wing. This design overcomes the issue of aspect ratio and drag of personal air vehicle. The telescopic wing configuration useful for span-based mission and C-wing provides less induced drag. Also the components of the C-wing can be used for vertical and horizontal stabilizers as like conventional airplanes. Theoretical and numerical simulation techniques are proceeded toward to identify the aerodynamic performance for various span length of the wing. The outcome recognizes the aerodynamic performance of the proposed wing design and without C-wing that gives more desirable performance

Keywords

C-wing Telescopic wing Aerodynamic Personal air vehicle Conventional airplane 

References

  1. 1.
    Sams GD, Gurunathan K, Selvan P (2012) Conceptual design and analysis of ferrari F430 flying car, Final year undergraduate project report, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore 641 049, Tamil Nadu, India, April 2012Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haines TB (2009) First roadable airplane takes flight. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA). Retrieved 19 March, 2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Durbin DA (2012) Flying car gets closer to reality with test flight. boston.com. Associated Press. Retrieved April 20, 2012Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    First flight for Terrafugia. Retrieved 2 April, 2012Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dietrich AM (2009) TransitionSpecs-FirstFlight-200. Terrafugia. Retrieved 2 April, 2009Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    North American Free Trade Agreement Land Transportation Standards Subcommittee, ìHighway safety performance criteria in support of vehicle weight and dimension regulations: candidate criteria & recommended. Thresholdsî Working Draft for Consultation, November 1999Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fielding John P (1999) Introduction to aircraft design. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 84Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prandtl L (1924) Induced drag of multiplanes. NAA TN 182, 22 pGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laurendeau E (1990) Traînée Induite de Configurations d’Avions. École Nationale Supérieure de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace (ENSAE), Toulouse, France (September), 109 pGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroo IM (1984) A general approach to multiple lifting surface design and analysis. AIAA paper 84-2507, October 1984Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    von Kármán T, Burgers JM (1963) General aerodynamic theory—perfect fluids. In: Durand WF (ed) Aerodynamic theory, vol 2, Dover edn. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prandtl L (1921) Application of modern hydrodynamics to aeronautics. NACA TR 116, 59 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Naveen
    • 1
  • B. Abinaya
    • 1
  • D. Abinaya
    • 1
  • K. Kalayarasi
    • 1
  1. 1.Aeronautical DepartmentBannari Amman Institute of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations