Advertisement

Customary Land in Zambia: The New Scramble and the Evolving Socio-political Relations

  • Horman ChitongeEmail author
Chapter
  • 215 Downloads
Part of the Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development book series (AAESPD)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, the demand for land in Africa has increased dramatically, due to various factors including population growth, growing interest in farm land from both foreign and local investors, the steady economic growth experienced over the last decade and half. These factors have created immense pressure on the available land resources, especially in areas surrounding major towns and cities, and areas close to developed social and economic infrastructure. In most African countries, the growing pressure on land is directed towards customary land which still constitute the largest portion of the land. In Zambia, as in many other countries, the growing demand for land has brought the policy and practice of converting customary land into leasehold tenure (privatisation) into the spotlight. While this policy is part of the Zambian government’s economic growth and rural development strategy (of ‘opening up’ the countryside to investors), there are huge challenges that this is creating. This paper examines the power relations around customary land in the context of the growing demand for land. The paper argues that the changing power and social relations raise serious questions about the future of customary land and the social fabric of rural communities.

Keywords

Land policy Tenure reforms Customary land Land acquisitions Zambia 

References

  1. Adams, M. (2003). Land tenure policy and practice in Zambia: Issues relating to the development of the agricultural sector. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M., & Palmer, R. (2007). Independent review of land issues in eastern and southern Africa. Mokoro: Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. AfDB [African Development Bank] (2011). The middle of the pyramid: Dynamics of the middle class in Africa, Market Brief. https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/The%20Middle%20of%20the%20Pyramid_The%20Middle%20of%20the%20Pyramid.pdf. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
  4. Brown, T. (2005). Contestation, confusion and corruption: Market-based land reform in Zambia. In S. Evers, M. Spierenburg, & H. Wels (Eds.), Competing jurisdictions: Settling land claims in Africa (pp. 79–102). Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Bruce, J., & Dorner, P. (1982). Land Tenure in Zambia: Perspectives, Problems and Opportunities. Land Tenure Centre Research Paper No. 76, University of Wisconsin-Maidson.Google Scholar
  6. Bruce, J. W., & Migot-Adholla, E. (1994). Introduction: Are indigenous African tenure systems insecure? In J.W. Bruce & E. Migot-Adholla (Eds.), Searching for Land Tenure Security in Africa (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  7. CAL [Committee on Agriculture and Land] (2009). Second report of the committee on agriculture and land. Prepared for the Tenth Session of the National Assembly. Lusaka: Zambia National Assembly.Google Scholar
  8. Chitonge, H. (2012). Land resource ownership and use in ‘Africa of the labour reserves’ (southern African development community). In C. Ben (Ed.), Land relations policy in southern African development community (pp. 57–88). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Chitonge, H. (2015). Customary land at a crossroads: Contest for the control of customary land in Zambia. SADC Law Journal, 4(1), 45–67.Google Scholar
  10. Chizyuka, R., Kamona, R. M., Ufwenuka, C., & Phiri, M. (2006). Policies and strategies for agrarian reform and rural development to secure and improve access to natural resources: National report—Zambia. Paper prepared for the International Conference on Agrarian Reform and Development (ICARRD), March 7–10, Porto Alegre, Brazil.Google Scholar
  11. Cotula, L. (2011). The outlook on farmland acquisition. International Land Coalition (ILC). http://www.landcoalition.org/en/resources/outlook-farmland-acquisitions. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
  12. CSO [Central Statistical Office] (2011). Population census preliminary results, 2010. http://www.mcaz.gov.zm/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/2010-Census-of-Population-Summary-Report.pdf. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
  13. Deininger, K., & Binswanger, H. (1999). The evolution of the World Bank’s land policy: Principles, experiences and future challenges. The World Bank Research Observer, 14(2), 247–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deininger, K., Derek, B., Lindsay, J., Norton, A., Selod, H., & Sticker, M. (2011). Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits?. New York, NY: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FRSP [Food Security Research Project] (2010). The status of customary land and how it affects the rights of indigenous local communities, submission to the Committee on Agriculture and Land Study.Google Scholar
  16. Fundanga, C., & Mwaba, A. (1996). Privatization of public enterprises in Zambia: An evaluation of policies, procedures and experiences. Economic Research Papers, 35. Tunis: African Development Bank.Google Scholar
  17. German, L., Schoneveld, G., & Mwangi, E. (2011). Processes of large-scale land acquisition by investors: case studies from sub-Saharan Africa. A paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, April 6–8, 2011. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  18. Havnevik, K. (1997). Land question in sub-Saharan Africa. In N.-I. Isaksson (Ed.), Land question in sub-Saharan Africa. Uppsala: Department of Rural Development Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
  19. Hichaambwa, M., & Jayne, S. T. (2014). Poverty reduction potential of increasing smallholder access to land. Working Paper, No. 83. Lusaka: Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI).Google Scholar
  20. Honig, L., & Mulenga, B. (2015). The status of customary land and the future of smallholder farmers under current land administration system in Zambia. Working Paper, No. 101. Lusaka: Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI).Google Scholar
  21. Hudson, J. (2007). The empty country. Journal Platform for Public Policy Analysis. http://fsg.afre.msu.edu/zambia/resources/ZIPPALand_3rd_Quarter2007.pdf. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
  22. ILUA [Integrated Land Use and Assessment]. (2008). ILUA report, 2005–2008. Lusaka: Department of Forestry and FAO.Google Scholar
  23. Jacoby, H., & Minten, B. (2007). Is land titling in sub-Saharan Africa cost-effective? Evidence from Madagascar. The World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 461–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jorgensen, S., & Loudjeva, Z. (2005). A poverty and social analysis impact of three programmes: Land, fertiliser and infrastructure. Social Development Papers, No. 49. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  25. Kabilika, E. (2010). The status of customary land and how it affects the rights of indigenous local communities. Zambia: Caritus.Google Scholar
  26. Kajoba, G. M. (1997). The landmarks of Zambia’s land tenure system: From protectionism to empowerment. Presented at the Conference on ‘Land Tenure in Development Cooperation, January 27–29. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  27. Kanyanta, C. (2014). The institution of chiefs is on slippery ground—Chitimukulu. Lusaka Times, July 3. https://www.lusakatimes.com/2014/07/03/institution-chiefs-slippery-ground-chitimukulu/. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
  28. Mafeje, A. (2003). The agrarian question: Access to land and peasant response in sub-Saharan Africa. Civil Society and Social Movement Programme, UNRISD, Paper No. 6.Google Scholar
  29. Moyo, S. (2010). Prospect for agrarian reform in southern Africa. Opening society through advocacy. Johannesburg: Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA).Google Scholar
  30. Mudenda, M. M. (2006). The challenges of customary land tenure in Zambia. Presented at the XXIII FIG Congress, October 8–13, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  31. Place, F. (2009). Land tenure and agricultural productivity in Africa: a comperative analysis of the economic literature and recent policy strategies and reforms. World Development, 37(8), 132–136.Google Scholar
  32. Platteau, J.-P. (1996). The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to sub-Saharan Africa: A critical assessment. Development and Change, 27(1), 29–86.Google Scholar
  33. Republic of Zambia. (2006). Draft land administration and management policy. Lusaka: Ministry of Lands.Google Scholar
  34. Roth, M., Khan, A. M., & Zulu, M. C. (1995). Legal and administration of land policy in Zambia. In M. Roth (Ed.), Land tenure, land markets and institutional transformation in Zambia (LTC Research Report, No. 124) (pp. 1–46). Madison, WI: Land Tenure Centre, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  35. Shipton, P., & Coheen, M. (1992). Understanding African land-holding: Power and meaning. Journal of International African Institute, 62(3), 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simutanyi, N. (1996). The politics of structural adjustment in Zambia. Third World Quarterly, 17(4), 825--839.Google Scholar
  37. Sitko, N. (2010). Fractured governance and local frictions: The exclusionary nature of a clandestine land market in southern Zambia. Africa, 80(1), 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. USAID (2010). Property rights and resource governance: Zambia country profile. www.usaid.org. Retrieved August 11, 2011.
  39. Van den Brink, R., Thomas, G., Bruce, J., & Byamugisha, F. (2006). Consensus, confusion and controversy: Selected land reform in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  40. ZDA [Zambia Development Agency (2011). Pledged land investment. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  41. ZDA [Zambia Development Agency] (2010). ‘Development and commercialisation of Nansanga farm block’, a Memorandum by the Multi-Sectoral Committee on Farm Block, Lusaka.Google Scholar
  42. ZLA [Zambia Land Alliance] (2002). Initial position paper on the draft land policy, civil society land policy review committee. Presented to the Zambian Government Land Policy Technical Committee, Lusaka Province Workshop, December 16–21, Lusaka.Google Scholar
  43. ZLA [Zambia Land Alliance] (2008). Land policy options for development and poverty reduction: Civil society views for pro-poor land policies and laws in Zambia. Lusaka: Civil Society Consultative Forum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for African StudiesUniversity of Cape TownRondebosch, Cape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations