Skip to main content

The Scramble for Land and Natural Resources in Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reclaiming Africa

Abstract

This chapter explores the historical and systemic dynamics of the new scramble for Africa, as well as the current land-grabbing patterns and agents. It is argued that, despite the emergence of new competitors from the South, the key drivers of the scramble remain the Western monopolies and their state patrons, in the context of terminal systemic crisis and transition. It is also argued that the scramble has set off new structural tendencies on the continent, which are transforming Africa’s trajectory in the twenty-first century. The tendencies point towards a convergence of economic and social characteristics among the regions, within the overall trend of intensified marginalization and subordinate integration into the world economy. Yet, new forms of resistance have also emerged, from the local to the national and regional levels, which have made concrete and substantial advances, especially in Southern Africa.

Sam Moyo (1954–2015)

This paper was first presented by Sam Moyo at the Round Table Dialogue on ‘Land Reform, Land Grabbing and Agricultural Development in Africa in the Twenty-first Century’, 17–18 June 2013, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The authors are grateful to Ndabezinhle Nyoni, Steve Mberi and Tatenda Matengu of the Sam Moyo African Institute for Agrarian Studies (AIAS) for their research assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By the turn of the century, about 200 million ha (32% of the suitable area) were being cultivated and 30% of the total land area (892 million ha) was under permanent pasture (FAOSTAT 2001).

  2. 2.

    For an elaboration of the concept of ‘functional dualism’, see de Janvry (1981).

  3. 3.

    The junker path, generally of landlords turned capitalists, has its variants in the white-settler societies of Southern Africa and today operates in tandem with transnational capital (Moyo and Yeros 2005).

  4. 4.

    A merchant path consists of non-rural capital, including merchant capital, petty bourgeois elements, bureaucrats, military personnel and professionals who gain access to land. They farm on a smaller scale than capitalist farms but are integrated into export markets and global agro-industry (Moyo and Yeros 2005).

References

  • Amin, S. (1972). Underdevelopment and dependence in black Africa: Origins and contemporary forms. Journal of Modern African Studies, 10(4), 503–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (1976). Unequal Development (B. Pearce, Trans.). New York, NY & London: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (2003). Obsolescent capitalism: Contemporary capitalism and global disorder. London & New York, NY: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (2010). The law of worldwide value. New York, NY: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (1973). International corporations, labour aristocracies, and economic development in tropical Africa. In G. Arrighi & J. Saul (Eds.), Essays on the political economy of Africa. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA [Central Intelligence Agency] (2001). The World Factbook. http://www.odi.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/, accessed in July 2001.

  • Cotula, L., Vermeulen, S., Leonard, R., & Keeley, J. (2009). Land grab or development opportunity? London & Rome: IIED, FAO & IFAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Janvry, A. (1981). The agrarian question and reformism in latin America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T. (2011). Silverlining Africa: from images of doom and gloom to glimmers of hope; from places to avoid to places to enjoy. Inaugural address, Leiden University and African Studies Centre, January 14. Available at http://www.padev.nl/other_output/Dietz_2011_Silverling_Africa.pdf.

  • Dos Santos, T. (1978), Imperialismo y dependencia. México: Era.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doss, C., Summerfield, G., & Tsikata, D. (2014). Land, gender and food security. Feminist Economics, 20(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA [United Nations Economic Commission for Africa] (2003). Land tenure systems and sustainable development in Southern Africa. Document No. ECA/SA/EGM.Land/2003/2, (pp. 2–3).

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2001a). Gender and food security fact files. Available on http://www.fao.org/Gender/en/agri-e.htm.

  • FAO. (2001b). Forest resources assessment 2000. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010). The state of food insecurity in the World: Addressing food insecurity in protracted crises. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2013). Towards successful family farming in Africa. Position paper from Cape Town Dialogue. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT. (2001). Statistics database of the united nations food and agriculture organization. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT. (2013). FAOSTAT database. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.

  • Foster, J. B. (2010a). The age of monopoly-finance capital. Monthly Review, 61(9), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B. (2010b). The financialization of accumulation. Monthly Review, 62(5), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B., McChesney, R. W., & Jamil Jonna, R. (2011). The internationalization of monopoly capital. Monthly Review, 63(2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. (2008). ‘The Global Food Crisis’, Public Lecture delivered at the University of Turin, Italy, May, http://www.networkideas.org.

  • GoC [Government of China]. (2006). China’s Africa policy. www.gov.cn/misc/2006–01/12/content_156509.htm.

  • GRAIN. (2008). Seized: The 2008 land grab for food and financial security. http://www.grain.org/briefings/?id=212.

  • Hendricks, F. (2000). Questioning the land question: Agrarian transition, land tenure, rural development in the former settler colonies of southern Africa. In Kwesi Kwaa Prah & Abel Ghaffar Mohammed Ahmed (Eds.), Africa in Transformation: Political and Economic Issues, Vol. 1 (pp. 33–64). Addis Ababa: Organisation for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa (OSSREA).

    Google Scholar 

  • IFPRI. (2010). Food security and economic development in the Middle East and North Africa. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00985.Current State and Future Perspectives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, P., Moyo, S., & Yeros, P. (2017). Capitalism and ‘Labour Reserves’: A note. In C. P. Chandrasekhar & J. Ghosh (Eds.), Interpreting the world to change it: Essays for Prabhat Patnaik (pp. 205–37). New Delhi: Tulika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land Matrix. (2012). The online public database on land deals. http://landmatrix.org/en/. Retrieved December 2012.

  • Lake, W. B., & Souré, M. (1997). Water and development in Africa. Ottawa: International Development Information Centre, CIDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. (2009). The rise of China and the demise of the capitalist world economy. New York, NY: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mafeje, A. (2003). The agrarian question, access to land and peasant responses in sub-Sahara Africa. UNRID Programme papers on Civil Society and Social Movements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, R. M. (1969). Subdesarrollo y Revolución. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, R. M. (2000). A Dialética da Dependência, ed. E. Sader. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2008). A note on rising food prices. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4682. The World Bank. Development Prospects Group. July 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkandawire, T. (2011). Rethinking pan-Africanism, nationalism and the new regionalism. In S. Moyo & P. Yeros (Eds.), Reclaiming the nation: The return of the national question in Africa, Asia and Latin America (pp. 31–53). London & New York, NY: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkandawire, T., & Soludo, C. (1999). Our continent, our future: African perspectives on structural adjustment. Dakar, Ottawa and Asmara: CODESRIA, IDRC and AWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S. (2000). Land reform under structural adjustment in Zimbabwe: Land use change in the Mashonaland Provinces. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, Sam. (2008). African land questions, agrarian transitions and the state: Contradictions of neoliberal land reforms. Dakar: CODESRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S. (2011a). Three decades of agrarian reform in Zimbabwe. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 493–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S. (2011b). Land Concentration and accumulation after redistributive reform in post-settler Zimbabwe. Review of African Political Economy, 38(128), 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S. (2011c). Changing Agrarian relations after redistributive land reform in Zimbabwe. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(5), 939–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S., Jha, P., & Yeros, P. (2013). The classical agrarian question: Myth, reality and relevance today. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 2(1), 93–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S., Tsikata, D., & Diop, Y. (Eds.). (2015). Land in the struggles for citizenship in Africa. Dakar: CODESRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S., & Yeros, P. (2005). The resurgence of rural movements under neoliberalism. In S. Moyo & P. Yeros (Eds.), Reclaiming the land: The resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London & Cape Town: Zed Books & David Philip.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S., & Yeros, P. (2013). The Zimbabwe model: Radicalisation, reform and resistance. In S. Moyo & W. Chambati (Eds.), Land and agrarian reform Zimbabwe: Beyond white-settler capitalism (pp. 331–357). Dakar: CODESRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S., Yeros, P., & Jha, P. (2012). Imperialism and primitive accumulation: Notes on the new scramble for Africa. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy., 1(2), 181–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEPDG [National Energy Policy Development Group]. (2001). National energy policy, May. http://www.whitehouse.gov.

  • Nkrumah, K. (1965). Neo-colonialism: The last stage of imperialism. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, P. (1972). On the political economy of development. In Economic and political weekly, Annual Number (pp. 197 − 212).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, U. (1999). Export-oriented agriculture and food security in developing countries and in India. In Utsa Patnaik (Ed.), The long transition (pp. 351–416). New Delhi: Tulika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, P. (2008). The Accumulation process in the period of globalization. http://www.networkideas.org/feathm/may2008/ft28_Globalization.htm.

  • Patnaik, U., & Patnaik, P. (2017). A theory of imperialism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, A. (2016). Adivasi women agrarian change and forms of labour in Neoliberal India. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 5(1), 20–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodney, Walter. (1973). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schincariol, V. E., Barbosa, M. S., & Yeros, Paris. (2017). Labour trends in Latin America and the Caribbean in the current crisis (2008–2016). Agriarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 6(1), 113–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivji, I. G. (2009). Accumulation in an African periphery. Dar es Salaam: Mkuki na Nyota Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabb, W. K. (2008). The global food crisis and what has capitalism to do with it. www.networkideas.org/focus/Jul2008/fo28_Global_Food_Crisis.htm.

  • Tsikata, D. (2016). Gender land tenure and agrarian production systems in Africa. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 5(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2002). Africa Environment outlook—Past, present and future perspectives. Available on http://www.unep.org/dewa/africa/publications/aeo-1/171.htm. Retrieved on April 5, 2013.

  • World Bank. (2008). World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praveen Jha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moyo, S., Jha, P., Yeros, P. (2019). The Scramble for Land and Natural Resources in Africa. In: Moyo, S., Jha, P., Yeros, P. (eds) Reclaiming Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5840-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics