Skip to main content

Cities and Climate Co-benefits

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mainstreaming Climate Co-Benefits in Indian Cities

Part of the book series: Exploring Urban Change in South Asia ((EUCS))

Abstract

The New Urban Agenda (NUA) was launched during Habitat III, the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development, which took place in Quito, Ecuador, from 17 to 20 October 2016. This was one of the major global policy deliberations after the negotiation of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement. A key challenge remains how to actualize development goals without exacerbating the causes and consequences of climate change. Cities in developing countries particularly face an uphill task to become sustainable. Most of the climate research and action in the developed world like the US, Europe and Japan focused on mitigation strategies. Cities in developing countries until recently have had a limited research on climate response, that too pre-occupied with adaptation agenda. The co-benefit approach tries to bridge this gap, with integration of mitigation and adaptation agendas, vertical and horizontal coordination between sectors and scales of intervention. In this regard, India and other rapidly developing countries have the historical chance of following a different path of urban development. There are tremendous opportunities to harness massive urban climate co-benefits, which will be the only way to improve the well-being of the existing and growing number of urban dwellers without threatening the health of the planet and its inhabitants. This research will present a conceptual framework to investigate the different aspects of climate co-benefits relevant for Indian cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Habitat III is the third bi-decennial UN summits on urbanization. The first conference took place in Vancouver, Canada, in 1976 and the second in Istanbul, Turkey, in 1996.

  2. 2.

    Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) are the six greenhouse gases covered by the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (UNFCCC 2015, http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/3145.php). There are other gases, such as water vapour, which are not included in the Protocol.

References

  • Ahmed, M., & Suphachalasai, S. (2014). Assessing the costs of climate change and adaptation in South Asia. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel, S., Sheppard, S. C., & Civco, D. L. (2005). The dynamics of global urban expansion. Transport and urban development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsill, M., & Bulkeley, H. (2007). Looking back and thinking ahead: A decade of cities and climate change research. Local Environment, 12(5),447–456 (2007), doi:10.1080/13549830701659683.

  • Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2003). Cities and climate change: Urban sustainability and global environmental governance. Studies in physical geography and environment. Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Census of India. (2011). Provisional population totals-2011, Paper–II, Vol–II (p. 1). New Delhi: Census of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSE. (2014). Review of national mission on sustainable habitat. http://cseindia.org/content/national-mission-sustainable-habitat. Accessed on November 14, 2015.

  • Dhakal, S. (2009). Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4208–4219 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.020.

  • Dirgahayani, P. (2013). Environmental co-benefits of public transportation improvement initiative: The case of trans-Jogja bus system in Yogyakarta. Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58(1), 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodman, D. (2009). Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emission inventories. Environ Urban, 21(1), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doll, C. N. H., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2017). Climate co-benefits in urban areas. In C.N.H. Doll & Jose A. Puppim de Oliveira (Eds.), Urbanization and climate co-benefits: Implementation of win-win interventions in cities (pp. 1–23). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubash, N.K. (2012). Working paper 2012/1: The politics of climate change in India: Narratives of equity and co-benefits. New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng, Y., Ma, Z., Xue, B., Ren, W., Liu, Z., & Fujita, T. (2013). Co-benefit evaluation for urban public transportation sector—A case of Shenyang. China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58(1), 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2008). World energy outlook 2008 edition. international energy agency. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2008-1994/weo2008.pdf. Accessed on February 12, 2015.

  • IGES. (2010). Fact sheet No. 1 What are co-benefits? The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. http://pub.iges.or.jp/modules/envirolib/upload/3378/attach/acp_factsheet_1_what_co-benefits.pdf. Accessed on March 5, 2015.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007a). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Climate change–Summary for policy makers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). (2007b). In B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart. and J. Pan (Eds.), Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014a). Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In R.K. Pachauri & L.A. Meyer (Eds.) [Core Writing Team] Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). [Seto K. C., S. Dhakal, A. Bigio, H. Blanco, G. C. Delgado, D. Dewar, L. Huang, A. Inaba, A. Kansal, S. Lwasa, J. E. McMahon, D. B. Müller, J. Murakami, H. Nagendra, & A. Ramaswami]. (2014b). Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning. In Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel & J.C. Minx (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, P., Dong, W., Kung, Y., & Geng, Y. (2013a). Analysing co-benefits of the energy conservation and carbon reduction in China’s large commercial buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58(1), 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, P., Yihui, C., Geng, Y., Dong, W., Xu, B., Xue, B., et al. (2013b). Analysis of the co-benefits of climate change mitigation and air pollution reduction in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58(1), 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurniawan, T. A., Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., Premakumara, D. G. J., & Nagaishi, M. (2013). City-to-city level cooperation for generating urban co-benefits: The case of technological cooperation in the waste sector between Surabaya (Indonesia) and Kitakyushu (Japan). Journal of Cleaner Production, 58(1), 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martine, G. (2009). Population dynamics and policies in the context of global climate change. In J. M. Guzman, G. Martine, G. McGranahan, D. Schensul & C. Tacoli (Eds), Population dynamics and climate change (pp. 9–30). New York: UNFPA & London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckinsey. (2010). India’s urban awakening: Building inclusive cities sustaining economic growth. New Delhi: Mckinsey Global Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoEF. (2006). National environment policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoEF. (2009). India’s GHG emissions profile. New Delhi: Climate Modeling Forum, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoEF. (2010a). Climate change and India: A 4 × 4 assessment—A sectoral and regional analysis for 2030s. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoEF. (2010b). India: Greenhouse gas emissions 2007. New Delhi: Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment, Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India. pp. 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoEF. (2015). India’s intended nationally determined contribution: Working towards climate justice. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoUD. (2011). India’s urban demographic transition: The 2011 Census results-provisional. New Delhi: JNNURM Directorate and National Institute of Urban Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAPCC. (2008). National action plan for climate change 2008 (pp. 4–7). New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). Cities, climate change and multilevel governance. OECD Environmental Working Papers No 14. (pp. 30–44). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. G. J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Muntean, M. & Peters, J. A. H. W. (2016). Trends in global CO 2 emissions; 2014 report. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency; Ispra: Joint Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2009). The implementation of climate change related policies at the subnational level: An analysis of three countries. Habitat International, 33(3), 253–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2013). Learning how to align climate, environmental and development objectives: Lessons from the implementation of climate cobenefits initiatives in urban Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., Doll, C. N. H., Kurniawan, T. A., Geng, Y., Kapshe, M., & Huisingh, D. (2013). Promoting win–win situations in climate change mitigation, local environmental quality and development in Asian cities through co-benefits. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, D. (2009). The implications of population growth and urbanization for climate change. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 545–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, H., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Global cities and the governance of climate change: What is the role of law in cities?’. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36(2), 313–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, S. (2012). International climate negotiations and India’s role. In K. Dubash Navroz (Ed.), Handbook of climate change and India: Development, politics and governance (pp. 101–117). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, M. (2015a). Location of greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions from thermal power plants in India along the urban-rural continuum. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 586–600. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.067.

  • Sethi, M. (2015b). Mapping global to local carbon inequities in climate governance—a conceptual framework. International Journal of Development Research, 5(8), 5387–5397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, M., & Mohapatra, S. (2013). Governance framework to mitigate climate change: Challenges in urbanising India. In Huong Ha and Tek Nath Dhakal (Eds.), Governance approaches to mitigation of and adaptation to climate change in Asia (pp. 200–230). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, M., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. (2015). From global ‘North–South’ to local ‘urban–rural’: A shifting paradigm in climate governance? Urban Climate, 14(4), 529–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K.  C., Güneralp, B. & Hutyra, L.  R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16083–16088. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109, ISSN: 0027-8424, 1091–6490.

  • UN—United Nations. (1992). United nations framework convention on climate change. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN—United Nations. (2007). City planning will determine pace of global warming. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). 2016, Draft outcome document of the united nations conference on housing and sustainable urban development (Habitat III), Document A/CONF.226/4, e-book, United Nations. http://www.habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda. Accessed on November 10, 2016.

  • UN DESA. (2007). World urbanization prospects: The 2007 revision population database. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiTp4Km_bnRAhXKOI8KHQN-BbgQFggeMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.un.org%2Fesa%2Fpopulation%2Fpublications%2Fwup2007%2F2007WUP_Highlights_web.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEVD-nU6hxWN87kWBXwOSEX3_bfhQ&bvm=bv.143423383,d.c2I. Accessed on November 27, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN DESA. (2011). Urban population development and the environment wallchart. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/urbanization/urbanPopDevEnv_2011.shtml. Accessed on May 7, 2015.

  • UN DESA. (2012). World urbanization prospects: The 2011 revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjLjtOI_rnRAhUFrY8KHZ4bBVoQFggZMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.un.org%2Fen%2Fdevelopment%2Fdesa%2Fpopulation%2Fpublications%2Fpdf%2Furbanization%2FWUP2011_Report.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF_Uxn6vzYP5TSK1M3to2WAkOZCiQ&bvm=bv.143423383,d.c2I. Accessed on December 5, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (2015). Conference of parties, December 2015, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9. United nations framework convention on climate change. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09.pdf. Accessed on January 24, 2016.

  • UN Habitat. (2006/2007). State of the world cities report. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, London/Washington DC: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Habitat. (2011). Global report on human settlements 2011: Cities and climate change. London/Washington DC: United Nations Human Settlements Programme & Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNU-IAS. (2013). Urban development with climate co-benefits: Aligning climate, environmental and other development goals in cities. Yokohama: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2005). Integrated Environmental Strategies (IES) Program. Seoul, Korea: International Conference on Atmosphere Protection. CGE Training Workshop on Mitigation Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). Cities and climate change: An urgent agenda. New York: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahendra Sethi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sethi, M., Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. (2018). Cities and Climate Co-benefits. In: Sethi, M., Puppim de Oliveira, J. (eds) Mainstreaming Climate Co-Benefits in Indian Cities. Exploring Urban Change in South Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5816-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics