Skip to main content

Impact of Debt on Short-Run and Long-Run Growth: Empirical Evidence from India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Issues in Economics and Finance

Abstract

This study tries to analyse the impact of internal and external debt on economic growth in India during the period 1980–2014. Employing ARDL technique of co-integration, the study finds the negative impact of both internal as well as external debt on Indian economy in long run, thereby controlling for other variables namely trade openness, investment and population growth. The results of the error correction model (ECM) show that internal debt, external debt, investment, population growth and trade openness affect the economic growth both in short and long run. The relationship between debt (both internal and external) and economic growth turns out to be negative in long run. However, the short-run impact of internal debt is fluctuating; whereas external debt is negatively related to growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Internal debt mostly consists of borrowing through market loans, treasury bills, special securities issued to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) special bearer bonds, other bonds and securities issued to international financial institutions.

  2. 2.

    External debt component consists of multilateral and bilateral borrowing, which are concessional and non-concessional and government and non-government further, also includes borrowings from IMF, long-term borrowings, short-term and commercial borrowings.

  3. 3.

    India adopted reforms of liberalization, globalization and urbanization in 1991.

  4. 4.

    Other control variables included total factor productivity, exports, labour force, investment, debt service. Model by Bal and Rath (2014) differs from the model in this study as they took both external and internal debt in one equation of growth. However, both these debt variables are expected to have a very strong correlation and hence my model has two separate equations to test the impact of each of these debt factors on growth.

  5. 5.

    Sum of exports and imports is referred as trade openness variable, signified as trade.

References

  • Adofu, I., & Abula, M. (2010). Domestic debt and Nigerian economy. Current Research Journal of Economic Theory, 2(1), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, D. B., & Rath, B. N. (2014). Public debt and economic growth in India: A reassessment. Economic Analysis and Policy, 44, 292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Economic growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handbook of Statistics of Indian Economy. (2015–2016). Reserve Bank of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, R., & Singh, B. (2007). Debt-deficit dynamics in India and macroeconomic effect: A structural approach. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M. S., & Woo, J. (2010). Public debt and growth. IMF working paper WP/10/174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and Investment nexus for China: Evidence from co integration tests. Applied Economics, 37, 1979–1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, H. M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bound test approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for unit root in the time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi, M. N., & Ali, K. (2010). Public debt and economic growth: Evidence from Pakistan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 53, 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangarajan, C., & Srivastava, D. K. (2005). Fiscal deficits and government debt, implications for growth and stability. Special articles. Economic and Political Weekly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1951). On the principles of political economy and taxation. The works and correspondence of David Ricardo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press with collaboration of M.Dobb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, M. R., Faridi, M. Z., & Tariq, K. (2010). Domestic debt and economic growth in Pakistan: An empirical analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Science, 30(2), 373–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, C. (1999). Domestic debt and economic growth in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(23), 1445–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikita Pahwa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pahwa, N. (2017). Impact of Debt on Short-Run and Long-Run Growth: Empirical Evidence from India. In: Kamaiah, B., Shylajan, C., Seshaiah, S., Aruna, M., Mukherjee, S. (eds) Current Issues in Economics and Finance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5810-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics