Economics of LED Lighting

Chapter

Abstract

Lighting technologies have improved significantly over the past 10 years and now provide multiple options for supplemental plant growth lighting in greenhouses and sole-source lighting for indoor production. In 2014, the most efficient light emitting diode (LED) and high pressure sodium (HPS) fixtures had nearly identical efficiencies at 1.66–1.70 µmol per joule, but the initial capital cost of LED fixtures per photon delivered was five to ten times more than HPS fixtures. This high capital cost meant that the cost per mole of photons was thus 2.3 times higher for LED fixtures than for 1000-W HPS fixtures, calculated over a five-year period for electricity and fixture cost. The long-term maintenance costs for both LED and HPS technologies are small, and similar, so the economic incentive for using LEDs was only realized when a user took advantage of their more focused photon distribution pattern. Since 2014, the photon efficiency of LED fixtures has increased and the most efficient LED fixtures now exceed the best HPS technology (1000 W, double-ended). The cost per photon of LED fixtures for plant growth lighting is still high, but payback periods, compared to 1000 W HPS, of 8–20 years can be achieved in applications that utilize the lights for more than 4000 h a year. The payback period can be more rapid if users can take advantage of the focused output of LED fixtures to increase radiation capture. The lowest lighting system costs are achieved when an efficient fixture is coupled with effective canopy photon capture. We are continuing to evaluate advances in technology as they become available.

Keywords

LED fixtures Photon efficiency Energy balance model Spectral effects 

References

  1. Beadle CL, Long SP (1985) Photosynthesis—is it limiting to biomass production? Biomass 8:119–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broadersen CR, Vogelmann TC (2010) Do changes in light direction affect absorption profiles in leaves? Funct Plant Biol 37:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bugbee B (1995) The components of crop productivity: measuring and modeling plant metabolism. Am Soc Gravit Space Biol 8:93–104Google Scholar
  4. Bugbee B (2016) Toward an optimal spectral quality for plant growth and development: the importance of radiation capture. Acta Hort 1134:1–12Google Scholar
  5. Bugbee B, Monje O (1992) The limits of crop productivity: Theory and validation. BioScience 42:494–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bugbee B, Salisbury FB (1988) Exploring the limits of crop productivity: photosynthetic efficiency in high irradiance environments. Plant Physiol 88:869–878CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen XL, Guo WZ, Xue XZ, Wang LC, Qiao XJ (2014) Growth and quality responses of ‘Green Oak Leaf’ lettuce as affected by monochromic or mixed radiation provided by fluorescent lamp (FL) and light-emitting diode (LED). Sci Hortic 172:168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cope KR, Bugbee B (2013) Spectral effects of three types of white light-emitting diodes on plant growth and development: absolute versus relative amounts of blue light. HortScience 48:504–509Google Scholar
  9. Cope K, Snowden MC, Bugbee B (2014) Photobiological interactions of blue light and photosynthetic photon flux: effects of monochromatic and broad-spectrum light sources. Photochem Photobiol 90:574–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Craig DS, Runkle ES (2013) A moderate to high red to far-red light ratio from light-emitting diodes controls flowering of short-day plants. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 138:167–172Google Scholar
  11. Dougher TAO, Bugbee B (2001) Differences in the response of wheat, soybean, and lettuce to reduced blue radiation. Photochem Photobiol 73:199–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dougher TAO, Bugbee B (2004) Long-term blue light effects on the histology of lettuce and soybean leaves and stems. J Am Soc Hort Sci 129:467–472Google Scholar
  13. Evans LT (1993) Crop evolution, adaptation and yield. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans LT (1998) Greater crop production: whence and whither? In: Waterlow JC, Armstrong DG, Fowdenand L, Riley R (eds) Feeding a world population of more than eight billion people—a challenge to science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 89–97Google Scholar
  15. Evans LT, Dunstone RL (1970) Some physiological aspects of evolution in wheat. Aust J Biol Sci 23:725–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitter A, Hay RKM (2012) Environmental Physiology of Plants, 3rd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Folta KM, Maruhnich SA (2007) Green light: a signal to slow down or stop. J Exp Bot 58:3099–3111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goins G, Yorio N, Sanwo M, Brown C (1997) Photomorphogenesis, photosynthesis, and seed yield of wheat plants grown under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with and without supplemental blue lighting. J Exp Bot 48:1407–1413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hernández R, Kubota C (2015) Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs. Environ Exp Bot 121:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hogewoning SW, Trouwborst G, Maljaars H, Poorter H, van Ieperen W, Harbinson J (2010) Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. J Exp Bot 61:3107–3117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoover WH (1937) The dependence of carbon dioxide assimilation in a higher plant on wave-length of radiation. Smithson Misc Collect 95:1–13Google Scholar
  22. Hunt R (1982) Plant growth analysis. Institute of Terrestrial EcologyGoogle Scholar
  23. Inada K (1976) Action spectra for photosynthesis in higher plants. Plant Cell Physiol 17:355–365Google Scholar
  24. Johkan M, Shoji K, Goto F, Hahida S, Yoshihara T (2012) Effect of green light wavelength and intensity on photomorphogenesis and photosynthesis in Lactuca sativa. Environ Exp Bot 75:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keating K, Carberry P (1993) Resource capture and use in intercropping: solar radiation. Field Crops Res 34:273–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim HH, Goins G, Wheeler R, Sager JC, Yorio NC (2004) Green-light supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth under red and blue LEDs. HortScience 39:1616–1622Google Scholar
  27. Klassen SP, Ritchie G, Frantz JM, Pinnock D, Bugbee B (2003) Real time imaging of ground cover: relationships with radiation capture, canopy photosynthesis, and daily growth rate. In: Schepers J, Van Toai T (eds) Digital imaging and spectral techniques: applications to precision agriculture and crop physiology. American Society of Agronomy Special Publication No. 66, Madison, pp 3–14Google Scholar
  28. Long S, Zhu X, Naidu SL, Ort D (2006) Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ 29:315–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Massa GD, Kim HH, Wheeler RM, Mitchell CA (2008) Plant productivity in response to LED lighting. HortScience 43:1951–1956Google Scholar
  30. McCree KJ (1972a) The action spectrum absorptance and quantum yeild of photosynthesis in crop plants. Agric Meteorol 9:191–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCree KJ (1972b) Test of current definitions of photosynthetically active radiation against leaf photosynthesis data. Agric Meteorol 10:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Monje O, Bugbee B (1998) Adaptation to high CO2 concentration in an optimal environment: radiation capture, canopy quantum yield, and carbon use efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 21:315–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Morrow RC, Tibbitts TW (1988) Evidence for involvement of phytochrome in tumor development on plants. Plant Physiol 88:1110–1114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson J, Bugbee B (2013) Spectral characteristics of lamp types for plant biology. http://cpl.usu.edu/files/publications/poster/pub__6740181.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2016
  35. Nelson J, Bugbee B (2014) Economic analysis of greenhouse lighting: light emitting diodes vs. high intensity discharge fixtures. PLoS ONE 9(6):e99010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson J, Bugbee B (2015) Analysis of environmental effects on leaf temperature under sunlight, high pressure sodium and light emitting diodes. PLoS ONE 10(10):e0138930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138930 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Nishio JN (2000) Why are higher plants green? Evolution of the higher plant photosynthetic pigment complement. Plant Cell Environ 23:539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ouzounis T, Parjikolaei BR, Fretté X, Rosenqvist E, Ottosen CO (2015) Predawn and high intensity application of supplemental blue light decreases the quantum yield of PSII and enhances the amount of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and pigments in Lactuca sativa. Front Plant Sci. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00019 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Snowden MC, Cope K, Bugbee B (2016) Sensitivity of seven diverse species to blue and green light: interactions with photon flux. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0163121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163121 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Sun J, Nishio JN, Vogelmann TC (1998) Green light drives CO2 fixation deep within leaves. Plant Cell Physiol 39:1020–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Terashima I, Fujita T, Inoue T, Chow WS, Oguchi R (2009) Green light drives leaf photosynthesis more efficiently than red light in strong white light: revisiting the enigmatic question of why leaves are green. Plant Cell Physiol 50:684–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Terfa MT, Solhaug KA, Gislerød HR, Olsen JE, Torre S (2013) A high proportion of blue light increases the photosynthesis capacity and leaf formation rate of Rosa × hybrida but does not affect time to flower opening. Physiol Plant 148:146–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang Y, Folta KM (2013) Contribution of green light to plant growth and development. Am J Bot 100:70–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang XY, Xu XM, Cui J (2014) The importance of blue light for leaf area expansion, development of photosynthetic apparatus, and chloroplast ultrastructure of Cucumis sativus grown under weak light. Photosynthetica 53(2):213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yorio NC, Goins G, Kagie H, Wheeler R, Sager JC (2001) Improving spinach, radish, and lettuce growth under red LEDs with blue light supplementation. HortScience 36:380–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang T, Maruhnich SA, Folta KM (2011) Green light induces shade avoidance symptoms. Plant Physiol 157:1528–1536CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plants Soils and ClimateUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations