Abstract
Labour surplus economy is a theory in the analysis of an economy, featuring mainly a large rural work force in excess of its capacity under a certain level of development and the allocation process of the so-called surplus labour force within its economic dualism. Therefore, its development model is often defined by the transfer of a large proportion of the labour force from agriculture to industry and services and from rural to urban settings. However, its sustainability will be questioned by the remaining scales of the rural pool of workers in the context of the diminished demographic dividend and impacts by the improvement of rural income. By exclusively focusing on theories of rural–urban migration, Lewis’ model was the seminal theory, followed by the Ranis–Fei labour surplus model, Jorgenson’s agricultural surplus model, and the Harris–Todaro dual economic model. As a result of the drawbacks of the traditional dualism of labour market division, a trichotomy approach is presented in this chapter. The tripartite labour supply model, a new approach, divides the labour market into three divisions and offers an alternative interpretation of the Lewis turning point. It also provides essential reasoning behind the wage growth of migrant workers, through unpacking the wage relationship to the emergence of class consciousness that results in class struggle and in turn impacts on wage determination, as a new perspective in the theory of Labour Surplus Economy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
According to Lewis estimates, there is usually a gap of 30–50 percent plus between capitalist wages and subsistence earnings.
- 2.
The Lewis turning point, named after economist W. Arthur Lewi s, is a term used in economic development to describe a point at which a surplus rural labour force is no longer an unlimited feature, and thus induces the rising wage of migrant workers in industry .
- 3.
In Lewis theory, based on the trade relationship and the openness of the economy, the economic development is divided into three models. Model I is a typical closed economy, mainly used by Lewis ; Model II also maintained closed economy, however the capitalist sector depends on the trade with the non-capitalist sector, e.g., for food or raw materials, but there is no international trade , mainly used by Ranis-Fei, and Jorgenson; and Model III, which is under the open economy, including the international trade .
- 4.
Given the assumption that all agricultural output was consumed by agricultural labour force, the institutional wage rate equals to the total output (MN) divided by the total labour force (OM), which equals to the slope of ON line (as is reflected at point K on the TPP curve where the dotted tangential line at K is parallel to ON line).
- 5.
The rate of growth of the agricultural labour force, according to Jorgenson, is equal to the difference between the rate of growth of total population and the rate of technological progress in agriculture divided by the share of labour in agriculture .
- 6.
However, this process is based on another assumption that the rate of total agriculture output equals to the rate of population growth , that is to say, if there is no agricultural surplus, all labour remains on the land; if an agricultural surplus can be generated, a labour force available for employment in manufacturing grows at a rate which is equal to the rate of growth of the agricultural surplus.
- 7.
The depicted process is more or less the same as what Harris and Todaro assumed, however it is different because of attitudes towards these migrants either as a separation from urban workers or considering as urban workers. That is why the semi-urban worker is used with such a purpose.
- 8.
In the theoretical point of view, it is indeed for everyone who under this circumstance has the feature of transferability, however, as for real migration , there are other factors impacting the final decision.
- 9.
Since the net population growth in the long run is considered stable as mainly impacted by both natural fertility rate and mortality rate, which is not following Malthusian theory on population , stable proportion of the rural labour force as a whole is guaranteed.
References
BSR (Business for Social Responsibility). 2010. A Study on the Labor Shortage and Employment Guidelines for Manufactures in China. The Business for Social Responsibility. http://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/a-study-on-the-labor-shortage-and-employment-guidelines-for-manufacturers-i. Accessed 10 May 2015.
Ghatak, Subrata. 2003. Introduction to Development Economics. 4th ed. London/New York: Psychology Press.
Harris, J.R., and Todaro, M.P. 1970. Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis. The American Economic Review 60 (1): 126–142.
Jorgenson, Dale W. 1961. The Development of a Dual Economy. The Economic Journal 71 (282): 309–334.
———. 1967. Surplus Agricultural Labour and the Development of a Dual Economy. Oxford Economic Papers 19 (3): 288–312.
Lewis, W. Arthur. 1954. Economic Development with Unlimited Supply of Labour. The Manchester School 22 (2): 139–191.
———. 1958a. Unlimited Labour: Further Notes. The Manchester School 26(1): 1–32. United Kingdom.
———. 1958b. Employment Policy in an Underdeveloped Area. Social and Economic Studies 7 (3–4): 42–54.
———. 1966. Development and Distribution. In Employment, Income Distribution and Development Strategy, 26–42. London: Macmillan.
———. 1967. Unemployment in Developing Countries. The World Today 23 (1): 13–22.
———. 1972. Reflections on Unlimited Labour. In International Economics and Development, 75–96. New York: Academic.
———. 1979. The Dual Economy Revisited. The Manchester School 47 (3): 211–229.
Li, Cheng. 2017. Industrial Unrest and Role of Trade Unions in China. In Where Have All the Classes Gone? A Critical Perspectives on Struggles and Collective Action, Labor and Globalization, ed. Balashova Oksana, Goga Karatepe Ismail, and Aishah Namukasa, vol. 8, 126–145. Augsburg/München: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
Lu, Feng. 2012. 中国农民工工资走势:1979–2010. [China’s Migrant Workers’ Wage Trend: 1979–2010.] Social Sciences in China 7: 47–67.
MLSS (Ministry of Labor and Social Security). 2004. Investigatory Report on Migrant Labor Shortage. Beijing: The Ministry of Labor and Social Security of China.
Ranis, Gustav. 2004. Labor Surplus Economies. Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 900.
Ranis, Gustav and Fei, J.C.H. 1961. A Theory of Economic Development. The American Economic Review 51 (4): 533–565.
———. 1964. Development of the Labour Surplus Economy: Theory and Policy. In Publications of the Economic Growth Center. Homewood: Yale University/Richard D. Irwin.
Shao, Sijun, Nielsen Ingrid, Nyland Chris, Smyth Russell, Zhang Mingqiong, and Jiuhua Zhu Cherrie. 2007. Migrants as Homo Economicus: Explaining the Emerging Phenomenon of a Shortage of Migrant Labour in China’s Costal Provinces. China Information 21 (1): 7-41. SAGE Publications.
Todaro, M.P. 1969. A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries. The American Economic Review 59 (1): 138–148.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2013. China National Human Development Report-Sustainable and Liveable Cities: Toward Ecological Civilization. United Nations Development Programme. http://www.cn.undp.org/content/dam/china/docs/Publications/UNDP-CH_2013%20NHDR_EN.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2015.
Wharton. 2006. Does a Growing Worker Shortage Threaten China’s Low-Cost Advantage? University of Pennsylvania. http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/does-a-growing-worker-shortage-threaten-chinas-low-cost-advantage/. Accessed 23 Oct 2015.
Yang, Cong Min and Li, Yuan Yang. 2009. 当代中国农民工流动规模考察. [The Scale Investigation of Contemporary Chinese Migrant Workers.] PROBE 4: 131–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, C. (2017). A New Approach to Rural Labour Mobility in the Labour Surplus Economy: A Tripartite Labour Supply Model. In: Xaxa, V., Saha, D., Singha, R. (eds) Work, Institutions and Sustainable Livelihood. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5756-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5756-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5755-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5756-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)