Skip to main content

Agriculture Drought Management Options: Scope and Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Drought is one of the recurring features of Indian agriculture especially in the rainfed areas. Severity of its impacts depends upon its nature (chronic and contingent), its duration and frequency, and the extent of area afflicted. Drought not only impacts production at farm level vis-à-vis national food security but also causes miseries to human life and livestock. The present drought management strategies, however, are skewed toward crisis management rather than risk management. The latter needs enhanced insight into even the minute features of the agroecologies for viable solutions to mitigate drought stress. These solutions are determined by capacity to reduce soil moisture deficit, minimizing the impact of drought and accelerating the recovery. However, the key technologies for drought proofing are watershed management, in situ water conservation, and integrated farming systems that include resilient crops, contingent crop plans, etc. Drought stress management further needs shaping through modern tools for characterization of agroecosystem, stress mitigation options, and genetic modification of crops for drought tolerance. In this context, the present review attempts to look at various options being offered by advances in drought management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adlul I, Paresh BS, Soora NK, Nataraja S, Sikka AK, Aggarwal PK (2014) Modeling water management and food security in India under climate change: practical applications of agricultural system models to optimize the use of limited water. In: Ahuja LR, Ma L, Lascano RJ (eds) Advances in agricultural systems modeling 5. Practical applications of agricultural system models to optimize the use of limited water, pp 267–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1991) In: Misra DC (ed) The drought of 1987: response and management, vol I. DOAC, GOI

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2012) Crisis management plan: drought. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, GOI

    Google Scholar 

  • American Heritage Dictionary (1976) Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Aseffa S, Welch EW (2015) Ex-post use restriction and benefit- sharing provisions for access to non-plant genetic materials for public research. Appl Econ Perspect Pol 37(4):667–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asghar HN, Zahir ZA, Akram MA, Ahmad HT, Hussain MB (2015) Isolation and screening of beneficial bacteria to ameliorate drought stress in wheat. Soil Environ 34(1):100–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson RC, Beachy RN, Conway G, Cordova FA, Fox MA, Holbrook KA, Klessig DF, McCormick RL, McPherson PM, Rawlings HR III et al (2003) Intellectual property rights: public sector collaboration for agricultural IP management. Science 301:174–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe SE, Rao IM, Blair MW, Acosta-gallegos JA (2013) Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. Front Physiol 4:1–20. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhan S (2013) Land degradation and integrated watershed management in India. Intern Soil Water Cons Res 1:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential–are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Crop Pasture Sci 56:1159–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catola S, Marino G, Emiliani HT, Musayev M, Akparov Z et al (2016) Physiological and metabolomic analysis of Punica granatum (L.) under drought stress. Planta 243:441–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary VK (2016) Response of land configuration and mulches on maize–frenchbean–toria cropping system. Agron J 108(5):2147–2157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claeys H, Dirk I (2013) The agony of choice: how plants balance growth and survival under water-limiting conditions. Plant Physiol 162:1768–1779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CWC (2013) Water and related statistics. Water Resources Information System Directorate, Information System Organization, Water Planning & Project Wing, Central Water Commission, New Delhi. http://www.cwc.nic.in/main/downloads/Water%20and%20Related%20Statistics-2013.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • DOAC (2016) Agricultural statistics at a glance-2015. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation (http://eands.dacnet.nic.in/PDF/Agricultural_Statistics_At_Glance-2015.pdf

  • FAO (1996) Rome declaration on World food security and World food summit plan of action. World Food Summit 13–17 November 1996. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) Report on the state of the World's plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2011) Save and grow: a policymakers’ guide to the sustainable intensification of smallholder crop production. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2215e/i2215e.pdf

  • Fuehring HD (1975) Yield of dryland grain sorghum as affected by antitranspirant, nitrogen and contributing micro-watershed. Agron J 67:255–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuehring HD, Finkner MD (1983) Effect of folicote antitranspirant application on field grain yield of moisture−stressed corn. Agron J 75(4):579–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furbank RT, Tester M (2011) Phenomics–technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci 16:635–664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gepts P (2004) Who owns biodiversity and how should the owners be compensated. Plant Physiol 134:1295–1307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GoI (2009) National Policy on disaster management. Ministry of Home Affairs Government of India http://nidm.gov.in/PDF/policies/ndm_policy2009.pdf. Last Accessed: 20 Apr 2014

  • Hatfield JL, Boote KJ, Kimball BA, Ziska LH, Izaurralde RC, Ort D, Thomson AM, Wolfe D (2011) Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron J 103:351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL, Walthall CL (2015) Meeting global food needs: realizing the potential via genetics × environment × management interactions. Agron J 107:1215–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert B, Rosegrant M, Boekel MA, Van JS, Ortiz R (2010) The future of food: scenarios for 2050. Crop Sci 50:S-33–S-50. doi:10.2135/cropsci2009.09.0530

  • Hudson NW (1987) Soil and water conservation in semi-arid areas. Soil resources, management and conservation service. FAO Land and Water Development Division. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam A, Shirsath PB, Soora KN, Nataraja S, Lascano RJ (eds) (2014) Advances in agricultural systems modeling 5. Modeling water management and food security in India under climate change: practical applications of agricultural system models to optimize the use of limited water practical applications of agricultural system models to optimize the use of limited water, 267–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi PK, Jha AK, Wani SP, Sreedevi TK, Shaheen FA (2008) Impact of watershed program and conditions for success: a meta-analysis approach. Global theme on Agroecosystems, Report 46. International crops research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics and National Centre for agricultural economics and policy research

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham MB (2011) Water dynamics in soils. In: Hatfield JL, Sauer TJ (eds) Management: building a stable base for agriculture, pp 53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Hendrix SD, Clough Y, Scofield A, Kremen C (2015) Interacting effects of pollination, water and nutrients on fruit tree performance. Plant Biol 17:201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klukas C, Chen D, Pape JM (2014) Integrated analysis platform: an open-source information system for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Plant Physiol 165:506–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer P (1983) Water relations of plants. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Singh RD, Sharma KD (2005) Water resources of India. Curr Sci 89:794–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanaria V, Alberto P, Paolo S, Stanley HG, Oriana S (2015) Optimizing deficit irrigation strategies to manage vine performance and fruit composition of field-grown ‘Sangiovese’ (Vitis vinifera L.) grapevines. Sci Hort 179(2014):239–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesukat M (2012) Drought contingency plans and planning in the greater horn of Africa a desktop review of the effectiveness of drought contingency plans and planning in Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia. UNON, Published by United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) Regional Office for Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima RSN, García-Tejero I, Lopes TS, Costa JM, Vaz M, Durán-Zuazo VH, Campostrini E (2016) Linking thermal imaging to physiological indicators in Carica papaya L. under different watering regimes. Agric Water Manag 164:148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linsley RK, Kohler MA Jr, Paulhus JLH (1975) Hydrology for engineers, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill/Kogukusha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CB (2009) Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Ann Rev Environ Resour 34:179–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Roberts MJ, Schlenker W, Braun N, Little BB, Rejesus RM, Hammer GL (2014) Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the U.S. Midwest. Science 344:516–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Zhu Q, Chen Y, Liu Y (2016) CRISPR/Cas9 platforms for genome editing in plants: developments and applications. Mol Plant 9:961–974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahama GY, Vara Prasad PV, Kraig L et al (2016) Rice cover crops, fertilizer nitrogen rates and economic return of grain sorghum. Agron J 108(1):1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minhas PS, Bal SK, Sureshkumar P, Singh Y, Wakchaure, GC, Ghadge SV, Nangare DD, Taware PB (2015) Turning basaltic terrain into model research farm: chronicle description. NIASM technical bulletin 8, ICAR -National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, Pune, Maharashtra(India), p.64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molden D (2007) In: Molden D (ed) Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water Management in Agriculture. International Water Management Institute/Earthscan, London/Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • NAAS (2011) Drought preparedness and mitigation. Policy Paper No. 50, National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, New Delhi 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraja B, Ekambaram G (2015) A critical appraisal of integrated watershed management programme in India. IOSR-JHSS 20:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes de Limaa RS, Fábio A, Mazzei MA, Amanda OM, Bruna Corrêa SD, Tiago MF, de AG M, Elias FS, David MG, Eliemar C (2015) Partial rootzone drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) effects on stomatal conductance, growth, photosynthetic capacity, and water-use efficiency of papaya. Sci Horti 183:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantuliano S, Wekesa M (2008) Improving drought response in pastoral areas of Ethiopia Somali and afar regions and Borena zone of Oromiya region. ODI, London

    Google Scholar 

  • PAR (2010) Biodiversity for food and agriculture: contributing to food security and sustainability in a changing world; Outcomes of an Expert Workshop held by FAO and the Platform on Agrobiodiversity Research: Rome, Italy, 14–16 April; 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvizi H, Ali RS, Seyed HA (2016) Punica granatum (L.) Rabab under partial root zone drying and deficit irrigation regimes. Agric Water Manag 163:146–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlista AD (1995) Paraffin enhances yield and quality of the potato cv. Atlantic J Prod Agric 8:40–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott AR, Prescott AC (1990) How many plants feed the world? Conserv Biol 4:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Random House Dictionary (1969) Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman MM, Chen D, Gillani Z, Klukas C, Chen M (2015) Advanced phenotyping and phenotype data analysis for the study of plant growth and development. Front Plant Sci 6:619. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.0061

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rathore BMS, Sud R, Saxena V, Rathore LS, Rathore TS, Subrahmanyam VG, Roy MM (2014) Country Report prepared for the regional workshop for Asia Pacific as part of the UN water initiative. “Capacity Development to Support National Drought Management Policies” organized from 6–9th May 2014 in Hanoi, Vietnam Page 1 of 7 Drought Conditions and Management Strategies in India

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm S, Espig G (1991) The cultivated plants of the tropics. Verlag Josef Margraf and CTA, Weikersheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Jones JW, Hatfield JL, Ruane AC, Boote KJ, Thorburn P, Antle JM, Nelson GC, Porter C, Janssen S, Asseng S, Basso B, Ewert F, Wallach D, Baigorria G, Winter JM (2013) The agricultural model Intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric For Meteorol 170:166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyoum A, Welch EW (2015) Ex-post use restriction and benefit-sharing provisions for access to non-plant genetic materials for public research. Appl Econ Persp Pol 37(4):667–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekour GM, Brathwaite RAI, McDavid CR (1987) Dry season sweet corn response to mulching and antitranspirants. Agron J 79:629–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasarao CH, Ravindrachary G, Mishra PK, Subba Reddy G, Shankar GRM, Venkateshwaralu B, Sikka AK (2014) Rainfed farming: a profile of doable technologies AICRPDA-CRIDA. Tech Bull:194

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasarao NK, Shivashankara KS, Laxman RH (2016) Abiotic stress physiology of horticultural crops. Springer, New Delhi, p 368

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasarao Ch, Ravindra Chary G, Mishra PK, Nagarjuna Kumar R, Maruthi Sankar GR, Venkateswarlu B, Sikka AK (2013) Real time contingency planning: initial experiences from AICRPDA. All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), ICAR, Hyderabad 500 059, India, pp 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam P (1967) Incidence and spread of continental drought, WMO/IHD Report No. 2, Geneva, Switzerland: WMO

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger PW, Kirkham MB, Nielsen DC (2010) Water conservation for agriculture. In: Zobeck TM, Schillinger WF (eds) Soil and water conservation advances in the United States, SSSA Spec Publ, vol 60. SSSA, Madison, pp 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswarlu B, Kokate KD, Gopinath KA, Srinivasarao C, Anuradha B, Dixit S (eds) (2012) Coping with climate variability: technology demonstration on farmers’ fields in vulnerable districts. Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, p 160

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswarlu B, Ramakrishna YS, Subba Reddy G, Mayande VM, Korwar GR, Prabhakar M (2008) Rainfed farming: a profile of doable technologies. CRIDA. Technical Bulletin, pp 48

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanga H, Chenbing WB, Xiumei Z, Falin W (2015) Mulching increases water-use efficiency of peach production on the rainfed semiarid loess plateau of China. Agric Water Manag 154:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA, Glantz MH (1985) Understanding the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water Intern 10:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1992) The diversity of life. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Xianju L, Zizhong L, Qingguo B, Dongjian C, Wenxiao D, Zenghui S (2014) Sun effects of rainfall harvesting and mulching on corn yield and water use in the corn belt of Northeast China. Agron J 106(6):2175–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao-Min L, Huiming Z (2015) The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance. Front Pl Sci 6:774

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Duan L, Chen G, Xiong L, Liu Q (2013) Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:180–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagadish Rane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rane, J., Minhas, P.S. (2017). Agriculture Drought Management Options: Scope and Opportunities. In: Minhas, P., Rane, J., Pasala, R. (eds) Abiotic Stress Management for Resilient Agriculture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5744-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics